Finding Number of Stars that have Died

  • Thread starter Thread starter astrofunk21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of stars that have died within a specific timeframe using the Salpeter Initial Mass Function (IMF). The approach involves integrating mass distribution to determine star lifetimes based on their mass. A key point raised is the need to define what "died" means in the context of stellar evolution, particularly regarding stars that have transitioned off the Main Sequence. Clarification was made that the focus is on stars that have turned off the Main Sequence rather than those that have completely ceased to exist. The consensus is that once this definition is established, calculating the main-sequence lifetime as a function of mass should be manageable.
astrofunk21
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am currently looking to calculate the amount of stars that die within a certain time-frame. I am trying to go about this using the Salpeter IMF to figure the distribution of star masses...

∫M⋅Φ(M)dM

From here I would need to use star mass to calculate the lifetime of stars as a function of mass...t(M). Then using this I would apply it somehow to the distribution to find out how many of those stars die for a given time (t +Δt).

Is this the right train of thought?

Thanks in advance!

Edit:

Thinking about this more, I could also find the mass turnoff point at that time. From this can't I calculate how many stars are above that mass? That would give me how many stars have died up to that time? If this is all true, it must be difficult to make this a generalized formula...thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The first thing you will have to do is define "died". If a sun-like star has become a white dwarf, has it "died"? Or is it only dead when the white dwarf has cooled to the point where it no longer emits visible light? Or is it even dead then? It is still emitting longer wavelength radiation. How about a massive star that has gone supernova and left a neutron star behind. Has it "died"? The neutron start is still there. Once you have done this, you should be able to write down the star's lifetime as a function of mass. then your plan should work.
 
phyzguy said:
The first thing you will have to do is define "died". If a sun-like star has become a white dwarf, has it "died"? Or is it only dead when the white dwarf has cooled to the point where it no longer emits visible light? Or is it even dead then? It is still emitting longer wavelength radiation. How about a massive star that has gone supernova and left a neutron star behind. Has it "died"? The neutron start is still there. Once you have done this, you should be able to write down the star's lifetime as a function of mass. then your plan should work.
Thanks for the response. I should've clarified! Rather than "died" I should've said turned off the Main Sequence!
 
astrofunk21 said:
Thanks for the response. I should've clarified! Rather than "died" I should've said turned off the Main Sequence!

Then that should be fairly straightforward. You should be able to find the main-sequence lifetime as a function of mass.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top