- #1
Lynch101
Gold Member
- 766
- 83
- TL;DR Summary
- What are the things in the plus column for the Copenhagen Interpretation and what are the things in the minus colum?
Given the various different interpretations of quantum mechanics, I am interested in getting a general overview of most/all of them. I think it would be interesting to hear what people list as the positives of each interpretation as well as issues they perceive with each. I was thinking that, if people so choose, they could reply with what they would say both for and against a particular interpretation.
I'm thinking it might be best to go one theory at a time, so that it's easier to keep track of the information. The Copenhagen Interpretation is probably as good a place to start as any. To give an idea of the format I had in mind, I will outline what little I know in the for and against format. My own post will likely not be completely accurate, which is one of the reasons for starting this thread. I'm hoping to learn more from what other members think of the different interpretations, and then have some topics for further learning.
I understand that some of the positives and negatives will apply equally to the different interpretaions.
For
- The success of QM predictions (although this probably applies to all interpretations).
- It doesn't postulate any unobserved physical variables.
- It attempts to take the mathematical formalism at face value
Against
- the "measurement problem" (it doesn't specify the boundary between the quantum and macro worlds - is that accurate?)
- It doesn't tell us what happens in individual experiments (applies equally to all interpreations?)
- It gives rise to "Schroedinger's cat" type scenarios, which are not easily explained
I'm thinking it might be best to go one theory at a time, so that it's easier to keep track of the information. The Copenhagen Interpretation is probably as good a place to start as any. To give an idea of the format I had in mind, I will outline what little I know in the for and against format. My own post will likely not be completely accurate, which is one of the reasons for starting this thread. I'm hoping to learn more from what other members think of the different interpretations, and then have some topics for further learning.
I understand that some of the positives and negatives will apply equally to the different interpretaions.
For
- The success of QM predictions (although this probably applies to all interpretations).
- It doesn't postulate any unobserved physical variables.
- It attempts to take the mathematical formalism at face value
Against
- the "measurement problem" (it doesn't specify the boundary between the quantum and macro worlds - is that accurate?)
- It doesn't tell us what happens in individual experiments (applies equally to all interpreations?)
- It gives rise to "Schroedinger's cat" type scenarios, which are not easily explained