Force on 2 cables with weight attatched using Theta....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the forces on two cables supporting a weight, with angles θ_1 = 55° and θ_2 = 35°. The user initially applied the equilibrium equation F_1 + F_2 + F_g = 0 but encountered confusion regarding the weight's unit conversion, mistakenly using gravitational acceleration in calculations. After resolving the unit issue, the user confirmed the correct forces for cables 1 and 2 as approximately 502.46 lb and 351.82 lb, respectively. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent unit usage in physics problems. Ultimately, the user learned from the error and clarified their understanding of the problem.
Unicow
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


https://ibb.co/g6iKDQ
upload_2017-6-28_7-46-21.png


Calculate the magnitude of the force on cables 1 and 2 in the figure below if θ_1 = 55° and θ_2 = 35°.
(Round your answers to two decimal places.)

Homework Equations



Is my method incorrect or did I go wrong somewhere in my calculations??

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was I used the equation for F_1 + F_2 + F_g = 0.

F_1 = f_1 * <cos(125˚), sin(125˚)>
F_2 = f_2 * <cos(35˚), sin(35˚)>
F_g = 9.8 * (50) = 490<0, -1>

Then set F_1 + F_2 + F_g = <0, 0>

Moving to the system of equations
f_1*cos(125˚) + f_2*cos(35˚) = 0
f_1*sin(125˚) + f_2*sin(35˚) - 490 = 0

Solved for f_2 on first equation
f_2 = -f_1(cos(125˚)/cos(35˚))

plugged it into the 2nd equation
f_1*sin(125˚) + (-f_1(cos(125˚)/cos(35˚))sin(35˚) - 490 = 0

Solved for f_1 and got 502.46 rounded
and for f_2 I got 351.82.

After that, I plugged it into the F_1 and F_2 equations by
F_1 = 502.46<cos(125˚), sin(125˚)>
F_2 = 351.82<cos(35˚), sin(35˚)>

F_1 = <-288.2, 411.59>
F_2 = <288.2, 201.8>

Then got the magnitude with
Sqrt(288.2^2 + 411.59^2) = 502.46
Sqrt(288.2^2 + 201.8^2) = 351.83
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unicow said:

Homework Statement


https://ibb.co/g6iKDQ
I don't know how to make the pictures work...
Calculate the magnitude of the force on cables 1 and 2 in the figure below if θ_1 = 55° and θ_2 = 35°.
(Round your answers to two decimal places.)
Hello Unicow, :welcome:

Pictures go with copy/paste in windows. Don't know how to do it on a phone.
upload_2017-6-28_12-37-41.png

The problem statement is somewhat unfortunate: at each end of a cable equal but opposite forces are acting on the cable.
IMHO asking for the tensions in the cable is much clearer. Never mind.

I used the equation for F_1 + F_2 + F_g = 0
May be correct, but you don't tell us what they are...
F_1 = f_1 * <cos(125˚), sin(125˚)>
F_2 = f_2 * <cos(35˚), sin(35˚)>
F_g = 9.8 * (50) = 490<0, -1>
Again, you don't tell. I can guess, but that's not the idea!
Solved for f_1 and got 502.46 rounded
and for f_2 I got 351.82.
Did you check your answer to see if
f_1*sin(125˚) + f_2*sin(35˚) - 490 = 0
You do bother to continue finding ##\vec F_1, \vec F_2## (even though the exercise doesn't ask that) but fail to notice that ##411.59+201.8-490\ne 0##

And then you go on and calculate the magnitudes you had already !
 
Unicow said:

Homework Statement


https://ibb.co/g6iKDQ
View attachment 206199

Calculate the magnitude of the force on cables 1 and 2 in the figure below if θ_1 = 55° and θ_2 = 35°.
(Round your answers to two decimal places.)

Homework Equations



Is my method incorrect or did I go wrong somewhere in my calculations??

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was I used the equation for F_1 + F_2 + F_g = 0.

F_1 = f_1 * <cos(125˚), sin(125˚)>
F_2 = f_2 * <cos(35˚), sin(35˚)>
F_g = 9.8 * (50) = 490<0, -1>

Whoa! The question said the block weighs 50 lb, so is using the old English system of units That means that your ##g## is wrong; you need to use the value in English units also, or else convert the block's mass to kg.

There is also the issue of whether you should multiply by ##g## at all. In the USA at least, a 50 lb block exerts a force of 50 lb in Earth's sea-level gravity, so the ##g## is already incorporated in the 50 lb figure. (Basically, it is describing a mass by its force and mixing up the two concepts, but in a standard and understood way.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Unicow, SammyS and BvU
Ray Vickson said:
Whoa! The question said the block weighs 50 lb, so is using the old English system of units That means that your ##g## is wrong; you need to use the value in English units also, or else convert the block's mass to kg.

There is also the issue of whether you should multiply by ##g## at all. In the USA at least, a 50 lb block exerts a force of 50 lb in Earth's sea-level gravity, so the ##g## is already incorporated in the 50 lb figure. (Basically, it is describing a mass by its force and mixing up the two concepts, but in a standard and understood way.)

Yeah, I ended up figuring that out sooner or later haha. Stupid mistake leading to almost an hour of checking over my work mostly. The answer was so simple. Thank you though haha. I tried to incorporate what we used in class but failed to recognize that we used kg in class vs lb.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top