Gauss-Bonnet term extrinsic curvature

sourena
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Gauss-Bonnet term extrinsic curvature calculations?

In General Relativity if one wants to calculate the field equation with surface term, must use this equation:
S=\frac{1}{16\pi G}\int\sqrt{-g} R d^{4} x+\frac{1}{8\pi G}\int\sqrt{-h} K d^{3} x
The second term is so-called Gibbons-Hawking boundary term and K is extrinsic curvature.
If one is about to use another Lagrangian, for instance Gauss-Bonnet term, must calculate the new extrinsic curvature, K, associated with this new Lagrangian.
I want to know is there a standard method for calculating K?
I would be grateful if anybody can help me in learning this procedure. Please introduce references if you know some.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Wikipedia, what Gibbons-Hawking-York call "extrinsic curvature K" is the trace of the second fundmental form. Nonstandard terminology! But if this is correct, I can answer your question.

To describe a surface embedded in a larger manifold you need two sets of coordinates, hence two types of indices. Let xi be the coordinates in the outer manifold and uα coordinates in the submanifold, the surface. A basic quantity that transforms between them is

xiα = ∂xi/∂uα

This is a hybrid quantity, sometimes called a bitensor, with both kinds of indices present. The covariant derivative of such an object requires both kinds of Christoffel symbols,

xiα;β = ∂2xi/∂uα∂uβ + (outer)Γijkxjxk - (inner)Γδαβxiδ

It's easy to convince oneself that xiα;β represents a set of vectors orthonormal to the surface. Hence there must exist a surface tensor bαβ such that

xiα;β = bαβni

where ni is the normal vector. bαβ is called the second fundamental form.

The curvature you are after is the trace of bαβ.
 
The second fundamental form was defined to me as the vector-valued one-form (on the tangent bundle to the hypersurface) \nabla n where n is the normal vector field to the hypersurface in question, and the nabla operator is the covariant derivative operator on your manifold (restricted to directions in the hypersurface obviously). In this way, the second fundamental form (which is also sometimes called the extrinsic curvature!) measures the amount by which the normal field varies from point to point on the hypersurface.

Alternatively, the second fundamental form can be found, after some calculation, to be:
K=\frac{1}{2} L_n g'

Where L is the Lie derivative, and g' is the induced 3-metric on the hypersurface.

This equation is the one found in Wald.
 
Sorry sourena, I think I misunderstood your question! You're not asking, "How do I calculate the extrinsic curvature", you're asking, "What if the Lagrangian is something else besides R, then what will K be?".

I don't have an immediate answer, but here are some thoughts. For a general Lagrangian L which is a function of fields φ and their derivatives φμ,

δL = (∂L/∂φ)δφ + (∂L/φμ)δφμ

When we vary the action W = ∫L d4x,

δW = ∫δL d4x = ∫((∂L/∂φ)δφ + (∂L/φμ)δφμ)d4x

we need to integrate the second term by parts:

δW = ∫((∂L/∂φ - ∂μ(∂L/φμ) )δφ d4x + ∫∂μ((∂L/φμ)δφ)d4x

and write the total divergence as a surface term:

∫((∂L/φμ)δφ) d∑μ

What you want then is to find a K that produces this, i.e. such that

δK/δφ = (∂L/φμ)δφ nμ

where nμ is the normal to the surface.

Is this getting warm, do you think?

(For relativity, L = R and φ = gμν)
 
Last edited:
Dear Bill_K and Matterwave

First of all, thank you so much for your time and attention. I value it a great deal.

Yes Bill_k, this is what I want to do. To be more precise I'm going to explain what exactly I want:

Consider the action

SM=(1/2k2)\int d^{D}x\sqrt{-g}{R-2\Lambda+\alpha LGB}

where LGB=R2-4 RabRab+RabcdRabcd

Varying the action with respect to metric gives

\deltaSM=(1/2k2)\int d^{D}x\sqrt{-g}\deltagab(Gab+\Lambdagab+2\alphaHab)-(1/k2)\int d^{D-1}x\sqrt{-h}na(ga[cgd]b+2\alphaPabcd)\nablad\deltagbc,

where hab=gab-nanb is induced metric,

Pabcd=Rabcd+2Rb[cgd]a-2Ra[cgd]b+Rga[cgd]b,

and Hab=RRab-2RacRcb-2RcdRabcd+RacdeRbcde-(1/4)(R2-4RcdRcd+RcdesRcdes) the Lovelock tensor.

From the second term in \deltaSM one is able to calculate the following action

S\Sigma=\int d^{D-1}x\sqrt{-h}(K+2\alpha{J-2\hat{G}abKab})

Please look at the following paper, page 2

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208205

I want to learn the procedure by which I can calculate the extrinsic curvature, J and so forth from the boundary term.

I hope I could explain what exactly I want.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top