Going to the best ranked uni no longer makes sense?

  • Thread starter annoyinggirl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Uni
In summary, the conversation discusses the idea that attending a prestigious school may not always be the best option for academic success. Factors such as competition, individual learning styles, and personal circumstances should also be considered when choosing a college. It is important to accurately represent oneself in the admissions process and find a school that is compatible with one's own abilities and goals. While schools like MIT and Stanford are highly selective, there are still exceptions and some students may be better suited for a less renowned school. Ultimately, it is important to find a school that allows for personal growth and success.
  • #1
annoyinggirl
218
10
In high school, everyone and I tried to get admission into the best college we could. But then I realized that this doesn't make much sense. For example, if someone got into a reach school, and did so by luck (their GPA and SAT is lower than the average admitted student there), then when they get there, they would likely get a lower GPA than the average kid at that school, because they would be lower than average IQ and preparation and motivation. That kid who got in by luck would probably get a sub 3.0 gpa. The same amount of effort and intelligence at a safe school could get you a high 3.0 or maybe make you top of the class, because you would be more intelligent and motivated at that school.

This is especially of importance if someone wants to do a program that is designed to weed kids out like engineering, or want to go to grad or med school.

thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You might consider starting out at a smaller school and then moving on to a more prestigious one. If you go to a school that is well-known for its teaching (and lots of smaller ones are), that can help prepare you for the big university.
 
  • #3
annoyinggirl said:
In high school, everyone and I tried to get admission into the best college we could. But then I realized that this doesn't make much sense. For example, if someone got into a reach school, and did so by luck (their GPA and SAT is lower than the average admitted student there), then when they get there, they would likely get a lower GPA than the average kid at that school, because they would be lower than average IQ and preparation and motivation. That kid who got in by luck would probably get a sub 3.0 gpa. The same amount of effort and intelligence at a safe school could get you a high 3.0 or maybe make you top of the class, because you would be more intelligent and motivated at that school.

This is especially of importance if someone wants to do a program that is designed to weed kids out like engineering, or want to go to grad or med school.

thoughts?

It is very rare that people get into schools where they don't belong. Admission staff are very experienced.
I say just represent yourself accurately and you should end up somewhere compatible with yourself.
 
  • #4
While there is a point here, there's also a tremendous oversimplification.

The general point that one can expect to be in a more competetive environment when attending a school that had a higher admittance threshold in terms of GPA is a reasonable one. But there are a lot of assumtions to make if you are going to use this as a predictor of future academic success. Consider:
  1. While reasonable to assume a more competative environment, this isn't alwasy going to be the case. Some schools will specifically put in place policies or teaching methods so as to make the environment less competitive. I know of one program specifically where at the beginning of the year the professor simply asked the students what grade they wanted. As a class they all decided on an A+ and lo and behold they call came out with an A+. (Which was extremely frustrating for people like me who took a more challenging version of the class and ended up with a A-... but I'm not bitter). Alternatively the school could promote group work, teach classes as pass/fail, etc.
  2. Some students perform better or worse in a more competative environment. If everyone around you is studying hard, if you have intense and productive study groups, if you have access to professors who are really good at teaching... some people will really draw on these factors and perform better. Conversely, others who are used to being one of the top 5 students in the school, might struggle when they find that all of a sudden, they are a lot closer to the mean than they thought.
  3. Some people thrive in a university environment where they have a lot more control over the courses they take and the activities they're involved in and the friends they make.
  4. Some people really struggle when they have to live on their own for the first time, or when they get stuck in residence with a party-animal room mate, or when they are away from their closest friends.
The point is that as a student considering potential schools you can let the competition factor into your decision, but it's only one factor of many. You should look for a program that's going to jive well with how you learn, that's going to give you the opportunities that you want, and that's going to make economic sense to you.
 
  • #5
HomogenousCow said:
It is very rare that people get into schools where they don't belong. Admission staff are very experienced.
I say just represent yourself accurately and you should end up somewhere compatible with yourself.
In the UC system, this happens a lot, because unlike at other top schools, UC admits by school rank. Some kids that come from very small schools get into UCB or UCLA with SAT scores of under 1600, whereas kids with SATs of over 1900 wouldn't get into UCB or UCLA or even the mid tier UCs because they attended large schools.
 
  • #6
This is all very true. Obviously schools like MIT, Stanford, and the like are very selective, so most of the people there are well qualified to be there. But there are obviously still exceptions to this. Some people squeeze through the cracks, so to speak. For a student that's kind of on the border of being 'qualified' for MIT, it may make more sense to go to a school of less renown. If one goes to MIT, they're going to assume a certain level of knowledge. If one does not have this level of knowledge, they're going to struggle to keep up. This is a problem. If one is in a physics course and has to go back and learn the material for which knowledge was already assumed, they're going to spend a lot of time simply trying to catch up, which is in turn going to prevent their progress in learning the actual new material in the class.
 

1. Is going to the best ranked university still important?

It depends on your individual goals and priorities. While a higher ranking may provide certain advantages, it is not the only factor to consider when choosing a university.

2. What are the disadvantages of attending a highly ranked university?

Attending a highly ranked university often comes with a higher cost and may lead to increased competition and pressure. Additionally, the focus on rankings may overshadow the importance of finding the right fit for your individual needs and interests.

3. Are there other factors besides rankings that should be considered when choosing a university?

Yes, there are many other important factors to consider such as program offerings, location, campus culture, affordability, and personal preferences. It is important to research and weigh all of these factors before making a decision.

4. How important is the reputation of a university in the job market?

While a university's reputation may play a role in the job market, it is not the sole determining factor. Employers also consider factors such as your skills, experience, and personal qualities. It is important to develop a well-rounded profile rather than solely relying on the reputation of your university.

5. Are there any benefits to attending a lower ranked university?

Yes, attending a lower ranked university may provide unique opportunities for hands-on experience, mentorship, and personalized attention from professors. It may also offer a more diverse and inclusive community and a more affordable education. Ultimately, the value of a university education goes beyond its ranking and depends on the individual's experiences and achievements.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
447
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
941
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
942
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
3
Replies
92
Views
4K
Back
Top