How Can You Calculate t1 and t2 for a Rocket-Powered Sled on Ice?

In summary, the ice shed that is powered by a rocket engine accelerates from rest and moves with constant velocity for a time of 90 seconds.
  • #1
cy19861126
69
0
An ice shed powered by a rocket engine starts from rest on a large frozen lake and accelerates at 40 ft/s2. After some time t1, the rocket engine is shut down adn the sled moves with constant velocity v for a time t2. If the total distance traveled by the sled is 17500 ft and the total time is 90 s, find t1 and t2

My work so far... I divided the work into two parts: shed that accelerated and the shed that moves in constant motion. Since I know the equation is d = vi + 0.5at2. I plugged in 0 for vi, since the rocket starts from rest. I plugged in a for 40 ft/s2. Since I don't know what t and d are, I just left them there. I got d1 = 20ti2 Next, since I know d1 + d2 = 17500 ft and t1 + t2 is 90s, I plugged 20ti2 into d1 and got 20ti2 + t2 = 90s. What should I do next? I tried 3 hours on this hk problem, using different equations. But since I don't know the final velocity, I can't use any other equations for acceleration. I tried to use the value of the total distance, 17500 and total time 90s on equation d = 0.5 (vi + vf)t, but the velocity isn't constant so I can't do anything about it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I suggest you write down the equations of displacement (i.e. the distance travelled) for every part of the motion first. In the first period, t1, you have constant acceleration, in the second one, t2, you have constant velocity.
 
  • #3
radou said:
I suggest you write down the equations of displacement (i.e. the distance travelled) for every part of the motion first. In the first period, t1, you have constant acceleration, in the second one, t2, you have constant velocity.
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I used the equation d = vt and d = at2. For the first part, I plugged in d = at2 and got d1 = 40 * t2. For the second part, I plugged in d = vt, and I got d2 = v(90 - t1) since I don't know the velocity yet, I just put v there. Then I used d1 + d2 = 17500, and plugged in the numbers, and I got (40ft/s2)t1^2 + 90v - t1v = 17500. How can I solve for t1 in this equation? I have two variables in one equation
 
Last edited:
  • #4
cy19861126 said:
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. I used the equation d = vt and d = at2. For the first part, I plugged in d = at2 and got d1 = 40 * t2. For the second part, I plugged in d = vt, and I got d2 = v(90 - t1) since I don't know the velocity yet, I just put v there. Then I used d1 + d2 = 17500, and plugged in the numbers, and I got (40ft/s2)t1^2 + 90v - t1v = 17500. How can I solve for t1 in this equation? I have two variables in one equation

The equation of displacement for the first part is [tex]d_{1}=\frac{1}{2}at_{1}^2[/tex], and for the second part [tex]d_{2}=vt_{2}[/tex]. Now, the velocity v equals a*t1, so, after plugging that in, you get [tex]d_{2}=at_{1}t_{2}[/tex]. Further on, as you said, you use the condition that d1 + d2 = 17500, which implies [tex]\frac{1}{2}at_{1}^2+at_{1}t_{2}=17500[/tex] (*). Now, since you know that t1+t2 =90, just express t2 from this equation, i.e. t2 = 90-t1, and plug it into the equation marked with (*). Now you can calculate t1 from that equation, and t2 from t2 = 90-t1. I suggest that you convert ft to meters, depending on how your final solution must look like, regarding the units.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the "Hard acceleration problem"?

The "Hard acceleration problem" refers to the difficulty of achieving high acceleration rates in certain vehicles or systems without experiencing mechanical failures or other negative consequences.

2. What causes the "Hard acceleration problem"?

The "Hard acceleration problem" can be caused by a variety of factors, including inadequate engine power, improper gear ratios, or insufficient traction between the tires and the road surface.

3. How can the "Hard acceleration problem" be solved?

There are several ways to address the "Hard acceleration problem," such as increasing engine power, optimizing gear ratios, and improving traction through the use of specialized tires or other modifications.

4. Are there any risks associated with attempting to solve the "Hard acceleration problem"?

Yes, attempting to solve the "Hard acceleration problem" can come with certain risks, such as damaging the engine or other components if modifications are not properly implemented or pushing the vehicle beyond its capabilities.

5. Can the "Hard acceleration problem" be completely eliminated?

It is unlikely that the "Hard acceleration problem" can be completely eliminated, as there will always be limitations and trade-offs in terms of vehicle design and performance. However, it can be significantly improved through careful engineering and modifications.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
345
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
241
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
965
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top