How Do We See The Background Radiation?

  • Thread starter bitznbitez
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Radiation
In summary: The universe was transparent enough for all these photons to have a chance to reach us.The photons were "freed" from the plasma "trap". It's not like at a single moment you got a sudden photon emission, rather than all the photons that were trapped (their mean free paths were very small) stopped interacting with the rest of the plasma soup (because of the creation of neutral atoms and the cooling -could not ionize the atoms). What happened was that their mean-free-path became very large, enough for the Universe to be transparent.
  • #1
bitznbitez
Gold Member
16
1
We see objects either because they emit light [particle or energy] toward us or because light bounces off them in our direction. This is true for all energy not just visible spectrum. We see stars because they emit light towards us and nebula because it is, generally, illuminated by some stellar light source. These emit light in all directions and we see the light heading our way.

The CMB was released very early and, as I have heard it explained, has red shifted so far it is in the microwave spectrum as it moves "away" in all directions.

If its moving "away" how do we actually see it ?
If by way of answer its explained that in some sense part is heading toward us allowing us to see it why is it still shifted to the microwave end of things.

I'm sure this is answered somewhere I simply have not run across it yet.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
The CMB is not moving away from us. It is a radiation that is present everywhere in the Universe and it is composed of light that is moving in all possible directions. The CMB photons that we see are those which were emitted on a sphere around us at such a time that it has taken roughly 13 billion years for the light to reach us.
 
  • #3
As I understand it, your description is fine up to the point "it moves away": the radiation emitted fills space uniformly and isotropically and is not moving away.

What is getting farther is the surface of emission we see at a given time - the spatial location we are sampling, which is a sphere in the universe as it was 300k years old or so, is getting larger.
Not that this is fast of course or detectable in itself - nor is it "motion" really: we look farther, that's all.

Edit - added "as it was"
 
Last edited:
  • #4
wabbit said:
which is a sphere in the universe 300k years old or so
Just to clarify here: The CMB was emitted everywhere in the Universe when it was ca 300k years old. It has since taken the CMB light that we receive now roughly 13 billion years to reach us and due to the travel time, the CMB light that will reach us tomorrow will have been emitted further away from us than the CMB light we receive today.
 
  • #5
Ah yes thanks for the clarification - rereading my post I see one could take it to mean as 300k years ago - oops :)
 
  • #6
So as the plasma cooled and the universe became transparent the photos were emitted, essentially simultaneously, in all directions from essentially all points in the universe. The coolness / redshift is not because of the photons all moving away in the sense of motion rather the coolness redshift is a function of space stretching.

Is that what is being said essentially ?
 
  • #7
I think you got it.
 
  • #8
In a nutshell, yes. Our best theories suggest the universe has expanded continuously since the moment it came into existence. The CMB photons we currently observe were emitted when the surface of last scattering was at a proper distance of about 42 million light years. Due to expansion, those photons needed ~13.7 billion years to catch up with us.
 
  • #9
bitznbitez said:
The coolness / redshift is not because of the photons all moving away in the sense of motion rather the coolness redshift is a function of space stretching

Yup. It's a different "Doppler effect" that doesn't come from relativity, but from cosmology...

bitznbitez said:
So as the plasma cooled and the universe became transparent the photos were emitted, essentially simultaneously, in all directions from essentially all points in the universe

You could as well say that the photons were "freed" from the plasma "trap". It's not like at a single moment you got a sudden photon emission, rather than all the photons that were trapped (their mean free paths were very small) stopped interacting with the rest of the plasma soup (because of the creation of neutral atoms and the cooling -could not ionize the atoms). What happened was that their mean-free-path became very large, enough for the Universe to be transparent. That's true because photons before the time of last scattering were not absorbed by the atoms but rather underwent Compton (or later Thomson) scatterings. CMB photons that originated a little before the time of the last scattering, are a reason for the CMB-spectrum anisotropies (eg. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
CMB photons were not instantaneously unleashed in a blaze of glory at t=380,000 years. Some photons leaked out earlier, others later. We measure the average.
 

1. What is background radiation and where does it come from?

Background radiation refers to the constant presence of low levels of radiation in our environment. It comes from a variety of sources, including natural processes such as radioactive elements in the earth's crust, cosmic rays from outer space, and even our own bodies.

2. How do we detect background radiation?

We can detect background radiation using specialized equipment, such as Geiger counters or scintillation detectors. These devices measure the amount of radiation present in a given area and can provide information about its source and intensity.

3. What is the significance of background radiation?

Background radiation is important for scientists to study because it can provide valuable information about the history and evolution of our universe. It can also help us understand the effects of radiation on living organisms and the environment.

4. How do we see background radiation?

We cannot see background radiation with our naked eyes, as it is a form of invisible energy. However, scientists can use specialized instruments, such as telescopes or satellite sensors, to detect and measure background radiation.

5. Is background radiation harmful to humans?

The low levels of background radiation that we are exposed to on a daily basis are not harmful to humans. However, long-term exposure to high levels of radiation can have negative health effects, so precautions are taken to limit exposure in areas with higher levels of background radiation.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top