How does a non-linear Schrodinger equation implies non-unitary evolution?

IRobot
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I several times heard that one way to describe the collapse of the wave-function is to add non linearities in the Schrodinger equation (I know that this approaches are not convincing but that's not my point), however, I don't see why a non linear SE would imply loss of unitarity? As long as the Hamiltonian is hermitean, or real if you see it as a function of \psi and \psi^*, we can derive an equation of probability conservation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you call, loss of unitarity, to the breakdown of the superposition ?
------
and apart there are non hermitian hamiltonians that are unitary.
Mostafazadeh, Bender.
 
Well, I would call loss of unitarity any loss of unitarity, but as I heard of using non-linearities to describe wave-function collapse, and the breakdown of a superposition is non unitary evolution, I'd say maybe =)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top