How metals set up electrode potential in water or solution verification.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the explanation of how metals establish electrode potential in water or solution, particularly focusing on the role of ionization. The primary cause of ionization is identified as the negative charge of the oxygen atom in water molecules, which attracts positively charged metal ions. This attraction is influenced by metallic bonding, allowing electrons to flow freely within metals, facilitating the release of positive ions into the solution. If a metal loses too many positive ions, it becomes electron-rich, leading to a repulsion of electrons from its surface, which may cause recombination with metal ions in solution. Conversely, if a metal is electron-deficient, the weak holding force allows for easier removal of metal ions. The discussion also touches on the concept of hydration spheres and their role in the dissolution of positive ions in water, highlighting the complex interactions at play in the ionization process.
tasnim rahman
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I found this article on the web, describing how metals set up electrode potential in water or solution. How I see it the whole explanation makes sense to me, but I am not sure if its the right explanation. Could someone verify this? :confused:
 

Attachments

Chemistry news on Phys.org
The explanation, I must say, is very good. If you need any clarification at any particular point just reply.
 
I was wondering whether the WATER AND IONIZATION(page 9):...forces of ionization... part could be considered as correct. Thanks Ali, Ahmed.
 
It is correct.

- The main cause of ionization is the first force:
The oxygen atom within the water molecule is more negatively charged than the rest of the molecule (there is a permanent dipole in the molecule). This causes the molecule to attract positively charged ions on the oxygen part of the molecule. The bonding in metals is neither ionic nor covalent (it has its own name, namely metallic bonding); the type of bonding encourages electrons to flow freely within the metal and these freely flowing electrons also act as a type of holding force for the positive ions in the metal (there is much more to it than what I'm explaining, but I'm just giving you the essentials). With this, it is more favorable for the positive metal ions to leave the surface (and attract to the oxygen part of the water molecule) rather than electrons.

- If the metal loses too many positive ions (the metal will have an excess of electrons), the overall effect would be to repel electrons from the surface which in turn may recombine with the metal ions in solution.
- If the metal is electron deficient, then the "holding force" is weak and metal ions are more easily removed from the surface by the oxygen side of the molecule.

- Please let me know if I answered your question (I am known to babble).
 
I thought similar, but wasn't sure, and needed someone to verify it. Probably the positive ions also dissolve with hydration spheres, similar to those found when ionic solids dissolve in water, with hydration energies, etc. involved. Thanks a lot for the verification, Ali, Ahmed. :smile: :cool:
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top