How to decide between Perimeter Institute’s PSI and Cambridge’s MAST/Part 3?

In summary, the conversation discusses the decision to apply to either the Part 3 program at Cambridge or the PSI program at Perimeter Institute. The pros and cons of each program are discussed, such as the reputation and class size of Cambridge, and the smaller class size and guaranteed PhD position at PSI. The question is also posed about any additional information or insight on the programs and the types of professors one might encounter.
  • #1
clvsbr
1
0
Hey guys,
I’m gathering information in order to decide which master program to apply to (or, better, which one to go for in case I get admitted to both).

I have read quite a lot online but it seems people who talked about PSI took it many years ago, while it was bright new and yet adjusting. Now that it’s a renown program it might have improved...

On the one hand Cambridge’s Part 3 is an old program famous to be a great bridge from undergrad to graduate level physics. The downside seems to be a relative big and competitive class, and no security whatsoever in terms of a PhD position afterwards (apart from hard-to-get scholarships).

Perimeter Institute’s PSI, on the other hand, has a small class, similar high level courses, smoothly “guarantees” a PhD position afterwards, and provides funding to all students, but is less known than Cambridge, apart from the fact that the degrees themselves are awarded by University of Waterloo (which is great, don’t get me wrong, specially in Quantum Information, but it’s not Cambridge).

Is anyone familiar with both programs and/or schools and could give some extra info to help me decide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What profs are you likely to meet at these institutes?

Sometimes the proximity to greatness is better than the hallowed halls although Cambridge sounds just fantastic.
 
Last edited:

1. How do the curricula of Perimeter Institute's PSI and Cambridge's MAST/Part 3 differ?

The curricula of Perimeter Institute's PSI (Perimeter Scholars International) and Cambridge's MAST (Master of Advanced Study in Theoretical Physics)/Part 3 programs differ in terms of focus and structure. PSI is a one-year program that focuses on foundational theoretical physics courses and research, while MAST/Part 3 is a two-year program that offers a wider range of courses in both theoretical and experimental physics. Additionally, MAST/Part 3 includes a research project component.

2. Which program offers better opportunities for research and collaboration?

Both PSI and MAST/Part 3 offer excellent opportunities for research and collaboration. PSI is affiliated with the renowned Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, providing students with access to cutting-edge research and collaborations with top physicists. MAST/Part 3 is affiliated with the University of Cambridge, which has a strong reputation for research in both theoretical and experimental physics. Ultimately, the choice between the two programs may depend on your specific research interests.

3. What are the admission requirements for PSI and MAST/Part 3?

The admission requirements for PSI and MAST/Part 3 vary, but both programs typically require a bachelor's degree in physics or a related field, strong academic performance, and letters of recommendation. PSI also requires applicants to submit a research statement and participate in an online interview, while MAST/Part 3 may require applicants to take the Physics GRE exam.

4. Can I apply to both PSI and MAST/Part 3?

Yes, you can apply to both PSI and MAST/Part 3. However, keep in mind that these programs have different application deadlines and requirements, so it may be challenging to apply to both at the same time. Additionally, both programs are highly competitive, so it may be more beneficial to focus on one program and submit a strong application.

5. What are the career prospects for graduates of PSI and MAST/Part 3?

Both PSI and MAST/Part 3 provide excellent preparation for a career in theoretical physics. Graduates of these programs often go on to pursue PhDs in physics or related fields, work in research positions at top institutions, or enter industry careers in fields such as data science or finance. Ultimately, the career prospects for graduates of PSI and MAST/Part 3 depend on their individual interests and goals.

Similar threads

Courses Edinburgh, Imperial, Oxford, Cambridge....?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
Schools MSc in theoretical physics: Imperial College or Perimeter Institute?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
7K
DAMTP MASt at Cambridge: A Student's Perspective
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
3K
Programs Cambridge Part III vs Perimeter Institute master program
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Admissions US undergrad applying for Cambridge Math Part III
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
3K
Schools College choice: UCSB or Cambridge?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
17
Views
3K
Cambridge Part III Maths/Imperial QFFF
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
7K
Admissions Climbing my way to a Physics PhD 10 years after a Philosophy BA
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
2K
Admissions Safety School Programs for a Physics PhD
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Programs Navigating Cambridge Programs & Scholarships as an American Physics Student
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top