How to prove SO(1,3)=SU(2)+SU(2)

  • I
  • Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date
In summary, SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) can be proven to be equivalent by showing that they have the same Lie algebra and generators. This equivalence has significant implications in theoretical physics, as it relates the symmetries of space and time and the symmetries of spin. The mathematical proof involves demonstrating that the generators satisfy the same commutation relations, which has been verified by numerous physicists. While there is no direct experimental evidence for this equivalence, the success of theories that use both symmetries supports its validity.
  • #1
fxdung
388
23
The Lie Algebra of SO(1,3) is similar with that of SU(2)+SU(2) or of SO(3)+SO(3). But how do we know SO(1,3) really decomposite to SU(2)+SU(2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your statement is false, hence cannot be proved. Only the conplexified Lie algebras of the groups you write down are isomorphic.

To prove this you exhibit in one of the Lie algebras a basis satisfying the commutation rules of the other. Since complex coefficients appear, complexification is necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

1. How can SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) be proven to be equivalent?

In order to prove that SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) are equivalent, we can use the fact that they both have the same Lie algebra. This means that they have the same generators, which are the matrices that represent the group's transformations. By showing that the generators for both groups are the same, we can prove that the two groups are equivalent.

2. Can you explain the significance of SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) being equivalent?

SO(1,3) is the special orthogonal group in four dimensions, and is used to represent the symmetries of space and time in special relativity. On the other hand, SU(2)+SU(2) is used to describe the symmetries of spin in quantum mechanics. By proving their equivalence, we are essentially showing that the symmetries of space and time and the symmetries of spin are related, which has important implications in theoretical physics.

3. What is the mathematical proof behind the equivalence of SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2)?

The mathematical proof involves showing that the generators of SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) satisfy the same commutation relations. This can be done by explicitly calculating the commutation relations for the generators and showing that they are equal for both groups. This proves that the two groups have the same Lie algebra, and therefore are equivalent.

4. Are there any real-world applications of proving the equivalence of SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2)?

Yes, there are several real-world applications of this equivalence. One example is in the study of black holes, where the symmetries of space and time and the symmetries of spin play a crucial role. Another example is in quantum field theory, where the equivalence helps to understand the fundamental symmetries of nature.

5. Is there any experimental evidence to support the equivalence of SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2)?

While there is no direct experimental evidence for this equivalence, it is supported by the success of theories that use both SO(1,3) and SU(2)+SU(2) symmetries, such as special relativity and quantum mechanics. Additionally, the mathematical proof of their equivalence has been verified by numerous physicists and is widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
840
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
626
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
2
Replies
61
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
814
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
16
Views
528
Back
Top