I am thinking about joining the Air Force

In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of joining the Air Force ROTC program at the University of Arizona and the potential benefits and drawbacks. The group offers hints, tips, ideas, and opinions about the program, advising to make sure it is the right branch of the military and to consider it as a potential career. The conversation also mentions the potential for a good education and job opportunities after serving in the military. Other branches, such as the Marines, are also suggested. The conversation concludes with discussing the flexibility and potential obligations that come with being in ROTC.
  • #1
efekwulsemmay
54
0
I am thinking about going into the Air Force ROTC program at University of Arizona if I can get accepted. Hints, tips, ideas, opinions, words of praise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just make sure you want to do the Air Force and not another branch of the military. As long as you are an officer and have good grades, I think it will open a lot of cool doors for you.
 
  • #3
If you are just starting you should have a little while before you'll have to contract. You will have time to feel it out a bit. It is not for everyone, but you may really enjoy it. Good luck.
 
  • #4
plan to be the property of the US Government until they get tired of fighting wars to occupy lands where we want to establish oil pipelines not controlled by Russia and other enemies.
 
  • #5
I told my kids to say "Air Force", when the recruiters show up at the school and tell them they have one chance to choose.:uhh:

As for "fighting wars to occupy lands where we want to establish oil pipelines not controlled by Russia", the Air Force doesn't exactly put "boots on the ground".
 
  • #6
WhoWee said:
As for "fighting wars to occupy lands where we want to establish oil pipelines not controlled by Russia", the Air Force doesn't exactly put "boots on the ground".

still, for people thinking they're just going to spend 4 years in and then get on with their life, maybe they ought to realize it may end up being a career for them.
 
  • #7
Proton Soup said:
still, for people thinking they're just going to spend 4 years in and then get on with their life, maybe they ought to realize it may end up being a career for them.
If they decide that's what they want as a career, then it's all good.

The military will give you an excellent education and graduates are very sought after in civilian jobs. I don't see any down side to this if he's willing to go the military route.

My first husband wasn't going anywhere at NASA until he went into Naval Intelligence, spent two years at a desk job in Washington DC with Naval Intelligence, then they were begging for him. You can sign up for a 4 year tour and get early out in 2.
 
  • #8
The Air Force is one of the premier schools for insurance actuaries.
http://www.beanactuary.org/parents/salary.cfm

Salaries and Benefits

Actuaries are well compensated. Experienced Fellows have the potential to earn from $150,000 to $250,000 annually. In fact, did you know that new Associate actuaries earned a higher salary than the average MBA in 2002?

Compensation may vary significantly according to years of experience, industry, geographic region, and responsibilities. For example, an actuary with a Fellowship designation working as a financial manager in the banking industry could earn a higher salary than another Fellow working in the health insurance industry.

Up-to-date salary information for actuaries working in traditional insurance and pension settings can be found on the Web site of D.W. Simpson & Company. This firm's salary information is based on their latest Actuary Salary Survey.

Additional U.S. salary information for traditional actuaries can be found at the Bureau of Labor and Statistics at http://www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
Proton Soup said:
still, for people thinking they're just going to spend 4 years in and then get on with their life, maybe they ought to realize it may end up being a career for them.

I knew an officer at the AFRL that left the AF after his term of duty wrapped up, but retained his research job at the labs as a civilian. I think that was a good gig for him... but he certainly detested his first post-undergrad location -- guarding a missile silo in either North or South Dakota.
 
  • #10
Evo said:
The military will give you an excellent education and graduates are very sought after in civilian jobs. I don't see any down side to this if he's willing to go the military route.
I had several guys in my graduating class that the Navy was paying their way through a BS in physics. But they did have to serve a couple of years in their nuclear program and spend a year on a nuclear sub afterwords. These guys were really sharp.
 
  • #11
I think it will open up many doors for me. Honestly, I don't know how I am going to get in, if it will be through U of A ROTC or if I will go through their Officer Trainning School. But reguardless, if I do end up going in I will most likely go career for the AFRL. I am thinking that if I go to have them pay for my college I might as well give them their monies worth. :smile:
 
  • #12
Go into the Marines!
 
  • #13
efekwulsemmay said:
I think it will open up many doors for me. Honestly, I don't know how I am going to get in, if it will be through U of A ROTC or if I will go through their Officer Trainning School. But reguardless, if I do end up going in I will most likely go career for the AFRL. I am thinking that if I go to have them pay for my college I might as well give them their monies worth. :smile:

ROTC has a reasonable amount of flexibility to get out if you change your mind, as long as you change your mind during your freshman year. It's a great way to get your education paid for you, but do keep in mind that it's going to add some obligations to your time during college that you will need to balance with your academic workload. I've had a couple students in ROTC, and sometimes get a bit annoyed that the program expects them to skip classes for their major to attend military science seminars or classes or training events. I don't know if that's just here or everywhere that they are so unreasonable about planning things (I've been tempted to tell the students they can't go and let the people from ROTC contact me to explain why they should have to miss my classes, but usually leave it up to my students which is more important based on their individual career goals...if I had a student struggling in my course academically, I would take a firmer stand on it.) Anyway, just be prepared that it might happen to you too.

As long as you research the matter carefully, know what you're getting into, what obligations you have once in the program, then there can be a lot of positives of getting the training that comes with ROTC.
 
  • #14
Sorry to bump an old thread...but I'm interested. I'm currently 17 and plan to do an undergrad in physics. I also have a strong interest in Astrophysics and Cosmology. I have been planning on applying to Air Force ROTC but after reading around I see Navy is also a strong option. How possible is graduate education during post-undergrad in either? If I'm looking for Astrophysicist employment after completing phD which ROTC + service would be more beneficial if I decided to leave or stay?
 
  • #15
Evo said:
You can sign up for a 4 year tour and get early out in 2.

Er... No. Perhaps in your first husband's field, not as an O in the Air Force. If you sign up for 4 years, they'll keep you for four years, unless you're clammoring for a dishonorable discharge. And any schools you go, or additional education you receive carries an active duty service committment. Fortunately, they usually run concurrently. For education and any PCS, it's 2 years. For the flying schools it varies depending on the "needs of the Air Force," but it varried from 6 to 10 years while I was in.

Invyz said:
Sorry to bump an old thread...but I'm interested. I'm currently 17 and plan to do an undergrad in physics. I also have a strong interest in Astrophysics and Cosmology. I have been planning on applying to Air Force ROTC but after reading around I see Navy is also a strong option. How possible is graduate education during post-undergrad in either? If I'm looking for Astrophysicist employment after completing phD which ROTC + service would be more beneficial if I decided to leave or stay?

Either one, and if you want to use your physics degree and go into the nuclear Navy, you'll do very well! Grades, grades, grades, though. Both also have science and research functions.

It helps to round yourself out playing sports, joining a social organization, or other endeavors, just to prove you're not only a geek, but focus on the grades. Without the grades, the star captain of the team doesn't get into the nuclear Navy (or other worthwhile endeavors).
 
  • #16
Invyz said:
If I'm looking for Astrophysicist employment after completing phD which ROTC + service would be more beneficial if I decided to leave or stay?

Neither. While there are good reasons to join the military, do not expect it to help you in a career as an astrophysicist. That's not one of them.
 
  • #17
So if I wanted to work for NASA or another space organization, being in the Air Force would not help at all?
 
  • #18
What makes you think all (or even most) astrophysicists work for NASA.
 
  • #19
If you want to work for NASA or on NASA-run projects, you can accomplish that another way. For instance, there are people at the University of Arizona who work on NASA projects, including designing probes, suggesting missions, overseeing missions, etc. Plus U of A is affiliated with a world-class observatory complex. You could find out where your aptitudes lie, and with some hard work and good grades, you could end up working on research projects under the direction of your professors and/or grad students.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Vanadium 50 said:
What makes you think all (or even most) astrophysicists work for NASA.
nothing, its just a general goal of a career I could see myself doing and enjoy. They're simply an example
 
  • #21
turbo-1 said:
If you want to work for NASA or on NASA-run projects, you get accomplish that another way. For instance, there are people at the University of Arizona who work on NASA projects, including designing probes, suggesting missions, overseeing missions, etc. Plus U of A is affiliated with a world-class observatory complex. You could find out where your aptitudes lie, and with some hard work and good grades, you could end up working on research projects under the direction of your professors and/or grad students.
Really. I thought the experience would benefit character and help me succeed and help me gain research opportunities.
So my physics ambitions would not be aided at all by the military?
This is eye-opening. I'm glad I posted here. (:
 
  • #22
Invyz said:
Really. I thought the experience would benefit character and help me succeed and help me gain research opportunities.
So my physics ambitions would not be aided at all by the military?
This is eye-opening. I'm glad I posted here. (:
I didn't say that a stint in the military would not benefit you, but you must realize that for every benefit and every bit of specialized training the military gives you, they expect commitments from you, and those commitments may take a lot of your time. You can have a much more direct path to exciting research work if you approach it from the academic side and excel in your studies. I have a young friend from Mongolia that in his freshman year at U of A was given work operating the school's telescopes, and on at least one project that year he was building electronics for a specialized sensor under the direction of a couple of grad students. Certainly, there are opportunities if you work hard.
 
  • #23
The military won't be all that helpful for getting your PhD. In fact the conflicting time requirements would make being in the military a disadvantage.

The military would be a huge advantage if you wanted to be an engineer working with, or designing satellites. I wouldn't restrict that just to NASA, because if you come out with experience and a high security clearance, there's better paying options than NASA (NASA still outshines everyone else when it comes to glamor, though).

If you're sold on being an astrophysicist, then you'd probably be better off looking at other options for funding your education than the military.
 
  • #24
The Air force is a great idea to have them pay for your college, and then you get to be on base for 4 years!

I am currently thinking about Air Force Academy in Colorado, But they don't have the program I want to get into so its a downer there, but if I ever decide to go its a phone call to my recruiter away.

Having a job in the military, and then moving into the civilian sector, especially for sciences has helped a lot of people get jobs quick.

Would you rather hire someone who has served their country, has leadership skills, are able to stay on task and get the job done right the first time.

Or someone you really don't know about, their resume may look good, but you really just don't know.

I know who I would hire.

plus you get the satisfaction of serving your country and know that you have helped protect the freedom that so many take for granted.

Pilots are a mandatory 8 years I believe (what I was going into do) because of the extra training.

My cousin did naval ROTC, and while he was in college, has completed a whole bunch of training, from jump school to helo pilot. You will work your way up quick if you set your mind to it in the ROTC, so when you are done with college, instead of cleaning the bathroom, you get to be the guy telling the people to clean the bathroom!
 
  • #25
MotoH said:
The Air force is a great idea to have them pay for your college, and then you get to be on base for 4 years!

I am currently thinking about Air Force Academy in Colorado, But they don't have the program I want to get into so its a downer there, but if I ever decide to go its a phone call to my recruiter away.

Having a job in the military, and then moving into the civilian sector, especially for sciences has helped a lot of people get jobs quick.

Would you rather hire someone who has served their country, has leadership skills, are able to stay on task and get the job done right the first time.

Or someone you really don't know about, their resume may look good, but you really just don't know.

I know who I would hire.

plus you get the satisfaction of serving your country and know that you have helped protect the freedom that so many take for granted.

Pilots are a mandatory 8 years I believe (what I was going into do) because of the extra training.

My cousin did naval ROTC, and while he was in college, has completed a whole bunch of training, from jump school to helo pilot. You will work your way up quick if you set your mind to it in the ROTC, so when you are done with college, instead of cleaning the bathroom, you get to be the guy telling the people to clean the bathroom!

I'm impressed. You have to be nominated, usually by one of your Congressmen, for the Academy, plus your SAT scores normally have to be in the top 25%.

You're also lucky to have a recruiter that can get you into the Air Force Academy. Most students have to apply through the admissions office (same as any other college).

It is one of the top engineering schools in the nation (info for the kids that grow up and realize that there are other military careers besides "fighter pilot").
 
  • #26
All I have left to do is the SAT to get in.
 
  • #27
BobG said:
I'm impressed. You have to be nominated, usually by one of your Congressmen, for the Academy, plus your SAT scores normally have to be in the top 25%.

You're also lucky to have a recruiter that can get you into the Air Force Academy. Most students have to apply through the admissions office (same as any other college).
I'm glad I wasn't the only one that saw that. I almost spit my coffee out at the "one phone call away" comment. I have this vision that I saw a lot in my days..."but...but...my recruiter told me..."
 
  • #28
It's just like anything else you do in life. It's who you know, not what you know.
 
  • #29
MotoH said:
Would you rather hire someone who has served their country, has leadership skills, are able to stay on task and get the job done right the first time.

Or someone you really don't know about, their resume may look good, but you really just don't know.

It depends. Being ex-military can certainly be an advantage if you are trying to find job in industry, but it is not at all obvious that it is an advantage if you are looking for a position in academia (which, since the OP was talking about astrophysics, is likely here).

Remember that the most important thing for a successful academic career is to publish papers in good journals (which btw means that the "really don't know" simply doesn't really happen). Having leadership skills etc is obviously not a disadvantage, but most universities would rather hire someone who has published a couple of papers in Nature...I can think of a few examples of people who at times are really unpleasant, are nearly impossible to collaborate with but are nevertheless excellent (and successful) physicists.

Also, the academic world is VERY international, so "having served your country" etc doesn't necessarily mean as much as in other parts of society.
 
  • #30
I was going towards a more open approach for various careers, not just a career in astrophysics. In this case having the aforementioned things (published papers and so on) will land you a job far faster than having just served.
Joining the military to eventually get a PHD is probably not a really good idea, since they take long enough as it is, and having a 4 year gap between undergrad and graduate school is going to be more detrimental than good.
 
  • #31
MotoH said:
...and having a 4 year gap between undergrad and graduate school is going to be more detrimental than good.
Says who?
 
  • #32
Says my opinion.

Having a 4 year gap between schooling isn't going to be as good as going straight into graduate school. Not to say that it could help someone out either, just as a whole, waiting a long period of time between classes you are bound to forget things, and with 4 years of a job that will most likely not use most of the things you learned in college major wise, won't help either.
If it was a proven fact I would have cited it, otherwise it is my opinion.
 
  • #33
Be advised, that if you are considering the service, we are at war, and you stand a fair chance of being deployed in a forward area. I've seen a number of these threads on PF now, and everyone talks about how the military will pay for college, etc, and neglects the most important thing...

When you sign up for the military, you are agreeing to give your life for your country, if necessary. It's not a commitment to take lightly. People will depend on you, potentially in life or death situations.

You may be posted at some base in the US, or you may not be. And you may not have any control over that.

I'm not saying its a bad idea. I'm saying you should know what you're getting into.
 
  • #34
From the stories I have heard from people in the AF, most of them have gotten stationed in UAE or Greece, and flown sorties over the ToO, but of course the AF does go into the sandbox and guard duty is apparently the biggest job for them. Plus I believe its only like 6 weeks for a non-pilot
 
  • #35
MotoH said:
It's just like anything else you do in life. It's who you know, not what you know.
Maybe, but your recruiter has no pull whatsoever with the academy.
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
441
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
847
Replies
9
Views
269
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
22
Views
469
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
67
  • Classical Physics
Replies
31
Views
965
Back
Top