Imaginary parts of amplitues (Schwartz QFT text)

In summary, the integral in (24.24) goes imaginary when M > 2m due to the logarithms not being able to take negative real numbers, requiring the use of complex numbers. (24.25) is the principal value equation and (24.26) follows from the theta step function. The integral of the theta function yields the square root term in (24.27), taking into account the use of the imaginary unit in the propagator. Above threshold, the integral for the imaginary part can be simplified to (x1-x2), leading to the result in (24.27).
  • #1
Lapidus
344
11
From Schwartz http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic521209.files/QFT-Schwartz.pdf p. 257 or his qft book p. 455

imaginary parts of amplitudes.PNG


1. Why and how does the integral in (24.24) go imaginary, when M > 2m? Is it because the logarithms can not take negative real numbers, thus we have to switch to complex numbers?

2. (24.25) is the principal value equation, right?

3. How does (24.26) follow from what?! Is the little theta the theta step function?

4. How does (24.27) follow from (24.26)?! Taking the integral of the theta function gives us this square root term?

thanks for any hints and help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lapidus said:
1. Why and how does the integral in (24.24) go imaginary, when M > 2m? Is it because the logarithms can not take negative real numbers, thus we have to switch to complex numbers?

2. (24.25) is the principal value equation, right?

3. How does (24.26) follow from what?! Is the little theta the theta step function?
Right.
Lapidus said:
4. How does (24.27) follow from (24.26)?! Taking the integral of the theta function gives us this square root term?
Integrating a step function just means you have to figure out where the steps are, in this case the integral starts at 0, then the function goes to 1 for a while and then goes to 0 again. The steps are at M2x(1-x) = m2, solving that for x should give this expression for the difference between the x-values.
 
  • Like
Likes Lapidus
  • #3
Note that the correct sign has to be negative. That's because you have to take the ##\mathrm{i} \epsilon## in the propagator (which gives the correct time-ordered operator which must be used in vacuum QFT). So the ##m^2## in the Feynman integral (2.24) should be taken as ##m^2-\mathrm{i} \epsilon##, and then you have for the usual principle value of the logarithm ##\ln (-x-\mathrm{i} \epsilon)=\ln(|x|)-\mathrm{i} \pi##, and you have to use the usual principle value, because the integral must be real for space-like four-momentum, i.e., for ##p^2=M^2<0##.

Now to the integral for the imaginary part. Above threshold, ##M^2>4 m^2## the parabola ##f(x)=M^2 x(1-x)-m^2## is positive between its zeroes,
$$x_{1,2}=\frac{1}{2} (1 \pm \sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{M^2}}).$$
Since the square root is a monotonously growing frunction with ##M \geq 2m##, it's easy to see that both roots are in the interval ##[0,1]##, and thus you simply have
$$\int_0^1 \mathrm{d} x \Theta[M^2x(1-x)-m^2]=(x_1-x_2)=\sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{M^2}}.$$
This leads to the result (24.27) (which should be corrected for the subtle sign mistake mentioned above; note that it is in fact correct in the book on p. 455 Eq. (24.19)).
 
  • Like
Likes Lapidus and mfb

1. What are imaginary parts of amplitudes in Schwartz QFT?

In quantum field theory, amplitudes are mathematical quantities used to calculate the probability of a particle interaction. Imaginary parts of amplitudes refer to the imaginary components of these quantities, which represent the non-real or complex part of the calculation.

2. Why are imaginary parts important in Schwartz QFT?

Imaginary parts play a crucial role in quantum field theory calculations because they represent the quantum mechanical interference between different possible outcomes of a particle interaction. They are necessary for accurate predictions of particle behavior.

3. How are imaginary parts calculated in Schwartz QFT?

Imaginary parts of amplitudes are typically calculated using Feynman diagrams, which represent the possible paths of particles in an interaction. These diagrams are then translated into mathematical equations, with the imaginary parts being determined by the complex numbers in the equations.

4. Can imaginary parts be observed in experiments?

No, imaginary parts cannot be directly observed in experiments. They are purely mathematical constructs used to calculate the probability of a particle interaction. However, their effects can be observed in the overall behavior of particles.

5. Are imaginary parts unique to Schwartz QFT?

No, imaginary parts are a common concept in many areas of physics and mathematics. They are used in various calculations, such as in quantum mechanics and complex analysis, to represent non-real or complex quantities. However, their specific role may differ depending on the context.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
666
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top