- #1
Ingrid Eldevj
- 5
- 0
You can burn a hole in paper using a magnifying glass and light. What would happen if you applied this large-scale on a solar panel?
If you can afford to use a tracking mechanism, any concentrating system can give you a useful return but tracking is complicated,, expensive and definitely not 'passive'. Probably not worth while considering for large PV farms. Sometimes it's best just to go for a bigger area - depending. . . . . .Ingrid Eldevj said:thankyou for those resources, I'm currently investigating increasing efficiency of renewable power, but I am new to the subject.
Concentration doesn't increase efficiency in PV, it reduces efficiency...and for solar thermal it isn't really a function of concentration amount. Are you sure that is really what you are after? Maybe you are really just looking for increased output? Or cost effectiveness?Ingrid Eldevj said:thankyou for those resources, I'm currently investigating increasing efficiency of renewable power, but I am new to the subject.
Actually, a lenticular lens can put more of the incident light onto the active parts of each PV element. It's producing concentration on the 'pixel' level. (But only over a limited angle range, of course.)russ_watters said:Concentration doesn't increase efficiency
That is just a redistribution. It means you can make a smaller active area, and you can afford more efficient solar cells (as they don't have to cover the whole area). This alone (the use of small, more expensive but more efficient solar cells) leads to an effective increase in the efficiency.sophiecentaur said:Actually, a lenticular lens can put more of the incident light onto the active parts of each PV element. It's producing concentration on the 'pixel' level.
I don't suggest reducing the active area; that has its own cost in efficiency reduction due to higher running temperature. The pictures I have seen of PV cells show a border of substrate without PV. That border represents wasted incident light and suitable optics can eliminate it. That, in a reasonable definition of efficiency, implies an improvement. Incidentally, that 'redistribution' wouldn't affect the running temperature so there wouldn't be a diminution of efficiency.mfb said:It means you can make a smaller active area,
That is literally the only point of concentrator photovoltaics.sophiecentaur said:I don't suggest reducing the active area
Not if you are dealing with the ones that are available at present. If there is 'wasted' area then you can get more Power from the array. I was not suggesting that they should be deliberately manufactured with a large border of non-PV material. It has already been pointed out that reduced area can increase the operating temperature which reduces efficiency. What would be the point of doing that deliberately?mfb said:That is literally the only point of concentrator photovoltaics.
That assumes a technology that allows very high operating temperatures for your PV element. Do you know of any such thing that's available at the moment?mfb said:you make a cheap 1 m2 mirror/lens system focusing the light onto a single, expensive, high-quality 1 cm2 cell
"testbook" maybe, but we don't live on a textbook world.russ_watters said:Concentration doesn't increase efficiency in PV, it reduces efficiency...
Agreed....
When the energy source is free, the normal physics concept of efficiency isn't what is most important.
From what I could gather from that link, the market penetration is around 0.1% and they say that "the near term outlook for CPV industry growth has faded with closure of all of the largest CPV manufacturing facilities".mfb said:Those cells are installed and producing electricity. See the article linked in post 2.
The necessary steering is certainly one of them. You cannot do rooftop solar with CPV, installation costs will always be higher, and the modules are more complex.sophiecentaur said:That doesn't seem to suggest that it's a particularly good system . . . .yet. There must be some problems still to solve and I can't see them being on any of my neighbours' roofs in the foreseeable future.
Steering is a snag. You need to leave space between panels or, when they're steered, they can shadow each other. So they have to be spaced out more than you'd want. Steering a small array can be done on a single panel but you can't tilt a field.mfb said:The necessary steering is certainly one of them. You cannot do rooftop solar with CPV, installation costs will always be higher, and the modules are more complex.
Solar energy conversion efficiency refers to the percentage of sunlight that is converted into usable energy, such as electricity or heat.
Increasing solar energy conversion efficiency allows us to generate more energy from the same amount of sunlight, making solar power more cost-effective and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
There are several ways to increase solar energy conversion efficiency, such as using more efficient solar panels, optimizing the angle and direction of the panels, and incorporating reflective surfaces to capture and redirect more sunlight.
Some challenges in increasing solar energy conversion efficiency include the high costs associated with developing and implementing new technologies, as well as the variability of sunlight and weather conditions.
In addition to reducing our reliance on non-renewable energy sources, increasing solar energy conversion efficiency can also lead to job creation, improved air quality, and a more sustainable future for our planet.