- #1
fisher garry
- 63
- 1
In the green box in the attachment I have calculated the integral of the pdf of 24xy in the same manner as in the theory that leads up to 3.1 in the attachment. But I can't see any difference in that calculation that would explain that if 24xy is dependent why is not also the theory that leads up to 3.1 dependent. In the green box I would believe that ##\frac{1}{2}(1-y)^2## is ##F_X(a-y)## for a=1. I don't see any distinctions. Why is 24xy dependent while the theory up until 3.1 is independent?
The theory is taken from Ross, A first course in probability.