Interatomic distance in diatomic molecules

  • A
  • Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Molecules
In summary, the conversation discusses the potential for new physics models or standard model observables to be constrained by measuring the electron density at the massive nucleus of a diatomic molecule with one large and one small nucleus. However, it is noted that at the distances and energies involved in these molecules, quantum electrodynamics is extremely accurate and any discrepancies would be too small to measure. It is suggested that for insight into new physics beyond the standard model, higher energies may be necessary. However, it is also mentioned that atomic physics experiments have made significant contributions to understanding fundamental physics, such as confirming the values of the electron g-2 and fine structure constant. It is noted that while atomic physics systems may lack in energy scale, they make up for it
  • #1
Malamala
299
27
Hello! I know this question is quite random, but I wasn't sure how else to search for this. Assume we have a diatomic molecule with one large and one small nucleus, for example BaF, such that the electron (assume there is just one electron outside the open shell) is localized around the massive nucleus. Is there anything we can learn from the electron density at the massive nucleus as a function of the internuclear distance i.e. ##\rho_e^{Ba}(R)##? Are there any new physics models (or even SM observables) that can be constrained by measuring this dependence? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Atomic physics is well understood. At the distances and energies involved in diatomic molecules, quantum electrodynamics is extremely accurate, and any discrepancies between theory and experiment would be unmeasurably small. If you are looking to get insight on new physics beyond the standard model, you need to go to (much) higher energies.
 
  • #3
phyzguy said:
If you are looking to get insight on new physics beyond the standard model, you need to go to (much)
This is not entirely true. Atomic physics experiments confirmed the values of the electron g-2 and fine structure constant that put QED on a pedestal to begin with. In recent decades, tabletop atomic physics experiments have surpassed accelerators in niche experiments, like the search for the electron's electric dipole moment. And the traditional measurements of electron g-2 or fine structure constant continue to make accelerators drool. What atomic physics systems lack in energy scale, they make up for in sensitivity.

@Malamala Need some time to think it over. It feels like it'd have to be a three-body interaction since it depends on both the internuclear distance AND the electron density at the massive nucleus.
 
  • Like
Likes Malamala

1. What is interatomic distance?

Interatomic distance is the distance between two atoms in a molecule. It is typically measured in nanometers (nm) or angstroms (Å).

2. How is interatomic distance determined?

Interatomic distance is determined by measuring the distance between the nuclei of two atoms in a molecule. This can be done using techniques such as X-ray crystallography or spectroscopy.

3. What factors affect interatomic distance?

The main factors that affect interatomic distance in diatomic molecules are the types of atoms involved and the strength of the bond between them. Other factors such as temperature and pressure can also have an impact.

4. How does interatomic distance relate to bond length?

Bond length is the average distance between the nuclei of two bonded atoms. In diatomic molecules, the bond length is equal to the interatomic distance since there are only two atoms present.

5. Can interatomic distance change?

Yes, interatomic distance can change depending on the conditions of the molecule. For example, when a molecule is heated, the atoms vibrate more and the interatomic distance increases. This can also occur when a molecule is subjected to external forces or undergoes a chemical reaction.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
5
Replies
156
Views
7K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
960
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
7K
Back
Top