Is 200my enough for galaxies to form

In summary: Yes, in summary, the paper discusses a z=8.38 galaxy that was found to have significant dust content. It is likely that more high-z galaxies will be found with JWST, and the presence of dark matter during reionization may allow for the formation of massive galaxies.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
I thought that z= 7.5 was the maximum for galaxies to form after re ionization but this paper puts it at z=8.38,
can galaxies have formed this early?

arXiv:1703.02039 [pdf, other]
Dust in the reionization era: ALMA observations of a z=8.38 Galaxy
Nicolas Laporte, Richard S. Ellis, Frederic Boone, Franz E. Bauer, David Quénard, Guido W. Roberts-Borsani, Roser Pelló, Ismael Pérez-Fournon, Alina Streblyanska
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJL
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)

We report on the detailed analysis of a gravitationally-lensed Y-band dropout, A2744_YD4, selected from deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging in the Frontier Field cluster Abell 2744. Band 7 observations with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) indicate the proximate detection of a significant 1mm continuum flux suggesting the presence of dust for a star-forming galaxy with a photometric redshift of z≃8. Deep X-SHOOTER spectra confirms the high redshift identity of A2744_YD4 via the detection of Lyman α emission at a redshift z=8.38. The association with the ALMA detection is confirmed by the presence of [OIII] 88μm emission at the same redshift. Although both emission features are only significant at the 4 σ level, we argue their joint detection and the positional coincidence with a high redshift dropout in the HST images confirms the physical association. Analysis of the available photometric data and the modest gravitational magnification (μ≃2) indicates A2744_YD4 has a stellar mass of ∼ 2×109 M⊙, a star formation rate of ∼20 M⊙/yr and a dust mass of ∼6×106 M⊙. We discuss the implications of the formation of such a dust mass only ≃200 Myr after the onset of cosmic reionisation.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Look at this time-line diagram. Galaxies started to form quite soon after reionization started (T~400 Myr). Redshift z=8.38 translates to T~600 Myr, which looks reasonable. I think the question may rather be if such a massive galaxy could have formed in that time.
 
  • Like
Likes wolram
  • #3
Jorrie said:
Look at this time-line diagram. Galaxies started to form quite soon after reionization started (T~400 Myr). Redshift z=8.38 translates to T~600 Myr, which looks reasonable. I think the question may rather be if such a massive galaxy could have formed in that time.

Thanks for the reply jorrie.
I have been looking for a cited paper that will give me the earliest possible time after re ionization for a massive galaxy to form with no luck,I think it is reasonable to suspect that the galaxy in the paper is not the last most distant galaxy we will detect.
 
  • #4
The current king of confirmed high z galaxies appears to be GN-z11 at z = 11.09; https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00461, A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy, This corresponds to 400 million years after the big event and reaches back to the fringe of the so-called 'dark ages'. An unconfirmed candidate at z~11.8, UDFj-39546284, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L16/pdf, has also been reported. It is reasonable to expect JWST will find additional contenders after it launches [currently scheduled for 2018].
 
  • Like
Likes wolram
  • #5
Chronos said:
The current king of confirmed high z galaxies appears to be GN-z11 at z = 11.09; https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00461, A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy, This corresponds to 400 million years after the big event and reaches back to the fringe of the so-called 'dark ages'. An unconfirmed candidate at z~11.8, UDFj-39546284, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L16/pdf, has also been reported. It is reasonable to expect JWST will find additional contenders after it launches [currently scheduled for 2018].

Thank you for your reply Cronos.
Am i right in saying that a massive galaxy would need several mergers of smaller galaxies, and these smaller galaxies would have to have formed earlier than the massive one, also would dark matter have time to clump during the re ionization period?
 
  • #6
The consensus view is the progenitors of massive galaxies were what is called protogalaxies, which are basically huge unstructured star clusters believed to consist of of pop IIi stars. The stars are expected to be extraordinarily bright which gives us hope they will be visible to JWST.
 
  • #7
Thank you Cronos..
 

1. How long does it take for a galaxy to form with 200 million years?

The time it takes for a galaxy to form with 200 million years varies depending on various factors such as the amount of gas and dark matter in the region, the initial conditions, and the rate of star formation. However, on average, it is estimated to take around 100-200 million years for a galaxy to form.

2. Is 200 million years enough for galaxies to form in the early universe?

Yes, 200 million years is considered enough time for galaxies to form in the early universe. This is because the early universe was much denser and had a higher rate of star formation, resulting in galaxies forming at a faster rate compared to the present universe.

3. What evidence supports the idea that 200 million years is enough for galaxies to form?

Scientists have observed distant galaxies, known as "primordial galaxies," that formed within the first 200 million years after the Big Bang. These galaxies have very little heavy elements, suggesting they formed relatively quickly without much time for chemical enrichment.

4. Can galaxies form in less than 200 million years?

While 200 million years is the estimated average time for galaxies to form, it is possible for them to form in less time. This depends on the specific conditions and processes happening in that region of the universe. Some studies have suggested that galaxies can form in as little as 50 million years.

5. How does the size of the galaxy affect the time it takes to form?

The size of a galaxy does not necessarily affect the time it takes to form. Galaxies of different sizes can form within the same time frame, as it depends on the conditions and processes within the region. However, larger galaxies may have more complex and longer formation processes, resulting in them taking longer to form compared to smaller galaxies.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top