Is a bachelor in Physics a good idea for Engineering?

In summary, the conversation discusses the dilemma of a high school student from Spain who is interested in both physics and engineering. The student is unsure which field to pursue in university and is seeking advice on which degree would best prepare them for their desired career in research and development. While the student is fascinated by physics and wants to learn about the world and its workings, they also see the practical applications of engineering and are drawn to that field. The conversation also mentions the option of a dual degree in math and physics, as well as the potential challenges of switching from a physics degree to an engineering degree. Ultimately, the experts advise the student to choose the field that aligns with their career goals and to take advantage of elective courses to gain a broader knowledge
  • #1
lh9713
3
0
Hello!
I am a senior High School student from Spain.
The next year I'll start university, and I am full of doubts.
Personally, I am absolutely fascinated about Physics. I want to study it to learn about the world, why it is like it is and so on... I have seen the subjects and I think they are all interesting.
However, when I think about the job I would like to have, the first thing that comes to my mind is engineering. Like, ideally, I would like to work in research and development of some scientific project. Yet, I´ve look upon the subjects and engineering and they are more focused on the applications rather than on "why".
I had planned to get into a Physics degree (4 years) or into a Math-Physics degree (5 years) here in Spain, do my best to get the best GPA I can and then apply to a good Engineering program somewhere in the USA.
I would appreciate if you could give me your insight!
Regards :oldeyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the default answer for "is a degree in X good for doing Y" is that having a degree in Y in the first place is better. Considering your particular case: Research in physics starts at the PhD level. So doing a pre-PhD physics degree to then switch to engineering is somewhat pointless (from the perspective of wanting to do research).

Dealing with the "how" ("... to get things done") instead of the "why" ("... things work the way they do") is also research and development being done in research project (arguably more that the "why"-part, at least budget-wise). So from what you have said (wanting to work on research projects) that should not scare you away from engineering.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd
  • #3
If you're concerned about not learning "enough" physics in an engineering degree, don't be. You will learn loads of physics in an engineering degree. You could also easily take an elective course in some higher area of physics if you want as well, like an introductory quantum mechanics course or a physics-oriented EM course that could whet your appetite.

If you want to design and refine things, go for engineering. If you want to work on foundations research, go for physics PhD.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and symbolipoint
  • #4
No! Engineering has it's own accrediting body in the US that is separate from the schools. You will need to take licensure exams that require an ABET accredited degree. While you can get around that, it often requires work experience. This can be incredibly difficult to get without having a degree from an ABET accredited school. If you're interested in engineering, and want to do it as a profession, get the engineering degree. Just load up on physics electives.
 
  • #5
The above post is very true, but also keep in mind that many engineering jobs simply do not require a P.Eng designation, however in some domains it is basically mandatory.
 
  • #6
Many schools offer an Engineering Physics degree, which may be of interest to you. One of my friends is doing Engineering Physics (at UIUC) and he's going to be taking at least some of the upper level classical mechanics, E&M, and quantum mechanics. However, it differs in that about half of the upper level physics classes that would be taken by a physics major are instead occupied by various engineering courses.

And to reiterate a previous point, if one wants to do engineering, one should major in engineering. It's certainly possible to go from physics in undergrad to grad school for engineering, but one would have a disadvantage in comparison to their peers because there will be a lot catching up to do with the basic engineering course material.
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule
  • #7
Hello! Thank you for your replies.
Unfortunately where I live there isn´t the Engineering Physics degree. I was very attracted the dual degree in math and physics because I see it very generalist.
I thought that doing that would allow me to choose between a lot of fields to specialize when going to grad school. When I look into admissions webpages of grad programs I see that plenty of them accept physics undergraduates. However, I am just speculating...
One more question: you´ve said that if I would need to do a lot of catch-up if I decided to switch from physics to engineering and I´ve read somewhere that it could take a full year or so... is it true? it seems to much...
 
  • #8
lh9713 said:
Hello! Thank you for your replies.
Unfortunately where I live there isn´t the Engineering Physics degree. I was very attracted the dual degree in math and physics because I see it very generalist.
I thought that doing that would allow me to choose between a lot of fields to specialize when going to grad school. When I look into admissions webpages of grad programs I see that plenty of them accept physics undergraduates. However, I am just speculating...
One more question: you´ve said that if I would need to do a lot of catch-up if I decided to switch from physics to engineering and I´ve read somewhere that it could take a full year or so... is it true? it seems to much...

While there is some overlap in the courses required for a physics degree and an engineering degree, in order to get an engineering degree you will have to take the engineering courses.

You haven't stated what particular engineering field interests you, so the number and difficulty of the engineering courses will vary. For instance, a civil engineer will probably only be required to take a couple of courses in basic electricity, which might also be taken by a physics major, but an electrical engineer will have more take more required courses, everything from electronics to power engineering to whatever elective courses which are the student's desired focus in that discipline.
 
  • #9
Many engineering students aren't required to take anything beyond basic introductory physics. A lot of them don't even have to take the whole sequence. Many engineering students only take the first couple of semesters of the introductory sequence. This varies quite a bit from school to school, and between various fields of engineering. The majority of the courses in most engineering majors are engineering courses though.

Here are some various degree programs and their courses. This is all based on requirements at UIUC, as it's what I'm most familiar with.

Electrical Engineering -

General Chemistry
Calculus I, II, and III
Intro to Differential Equations
University Physics I, II, and III

That's a total of 31 hours. Then there are approximately 50 more hours of engineering and electrical engineering courses.

Mechanical Engineering -

General Chemistry
Calculus I, II, and III
Intro to Differential Equations
Linear Algebra
University Physics I, II, and III
Statics (intermediate classical mechanics)
Dynamics (intermediate classical mechanics)

That's about 29 hours. Then there are an additional 60 hours or so of mechanical engineering courses.

Specialized Curriculum in Physics

General Chemistry I and II
Calculus I, II, and III
Differential Equations
Linear Algebra

University Physics I, II, and III

Upper level physics
Classical Mechanics (2 semesters)
Electricity and Magnetism (2 semesters)
Statistical and Thermal Physics (1 semester)
Quantum Mechanics (2 semesters)
Upper level physics labs (2 semesters)
Plus physics electives. There's a great deal of difference here. A physics major prepares one to go to graduate school in physics. The things that you'd have to catch up on to go into engineering are on the order of the 50-60 credit hours of engineering courses required for those two fields of engineering. With the heavier physics knowledge, a lot of the engineering courses would be made much easier, but it's still a lot of material to catch up on.
 
  • #10
QuantumCurt said:
Many engineering students aren't required to take anything beyond basic introductory physics. A lot of them don't even have to take the whole sequence. Many engineering students only take the first couple of semesters of the introductory sequence. This varies quite a bit from school to school, and between various fields of engineering. The majority of the courses in most engineering majors are engineering courses though.

Here are some various degree programs and their courses. This is all based on requirements at UIUC, as it's what I'm most familiar with.

Electrical Engineering -

General Chemistry
Calculus I, II, and III
Intro to Differential Equations
University Physics I, II, and III

That's a total of 31 hours. Then there are approximately 50 more hours of engineering and electrical engineering courses.

Mechanical Engineering -

General Chemistry
Calculus I, II, and III
Intro to Differential Equations
Linear Algebra
University Physics I, II, and III
Statics (intermediate classical mechanics)
Dynamics (intermediate classical mechanics)

That's about 29 hours. Then there are an additional 60 hours or so of mechanical engineering courses.

Specialized Curriculum in Physics

General Chemistry I and II
Calculus I, II, and III
Differential Equations
Linear Algebra

University Physics I, II, and III

Upper level physics
Classical Mechanics (2 semesters)
Electricity and Magnetism (2 semesters)
Statistical and Thermal Physics (1 semester)
Quantum Mechanics (2 semesters)
Upper level physics labs (2 semesters)
Plus physics electives.There's a great deal of difference here. A physics major prepares one to go to graduate school in physics. The things that you'd have to catch up on to go into engineering are on the order of the 50-60 credit hours of engineering courses required for those two fields of engineering. With the heavier physics knowledge, a lot of the engineering courses would be made much easier, but it's still a lot of material to catch up on.

There's no need to do 50-60 credit hours to catch up to do graduate engineering work when coming from another stem discipline like math or physics. If one were doing electrical engineering for instance one should take signals&systems, circuit analysis, analog and digital electronics and some courses related to the specialization of their choice like power, communications, or whatnot but that's about it for undergraduate catch up, hardly 50-60 credits worth since you take specialized coursework in your masters degree. Back at my alma mater I knew math majors who only had to do the bit of EE course work that I suggested and they did masters in EE specializing in nano-technology and are working in the semiconductor industry. This is pretty common policy.
 
  • #11
Physics and Engineering are two different fields of study. Physicists do not study methods of design or the economics and ethics that engineers use. Conversely, engineers do not study the sorts of esoteric things that a physicist would be concerned with. Scales of the astronomical and subatomic are usually of little concern to an engineer.

Yes, you could eventually become an engineer if you studied physics, but you'd need years of additional, documented experience mentored by professional engineers. And because you would not have a formal degree in engineer, you'd probably do well to sit for the same exams that registered professional engineers take (The Fundamentals of Engineering and then later the Principles and Practices exam).

Thus I concur with all the comments above regarding the differences between these fields. If you think you would like to get into engineering, study engineering. If you are truly fascinated with Physics, then study Physics. These fields may look similar, but the actual practice and daily work is quite different.
 
  • #12
lh9713 said:
Hello!
I am a senior High School student from Spain.
The next year I'll start university, and I am full of doubts.
Personally, I am absolutely fascinated about Physics. I want to study it to learn about the world, why it is like it is and so on... I have seen the subjects and I think they are all interesting.
However, when I think about the job I would like to have, the first thing that comes to my mind is engineering. Like, ideally, I would like to work in research and development of some scientific project. Yet, I´ve look upon the subjects and engineering and they are more focused on the applications rather than on "why".
I had planned to get into a Physics degree (4 years) or into a Math-Physics degree (5 years) here in Spain, do my best to get the best GPA I can and then apply to a good Engineering program somewhere in the USA.
I would appreciate if you could give me your insight!
Regards :oldeyes:

This is a VERY odd question. If you wish to eventually do Engineering, why won't you simply do your undergraduate degree in engineering? Or is this not obvious enough?

Here's a simple lesson: If you wish to either do A in graduate school, or work in the field of A, it is EASIEST and most direct to major in A! If you majored in B, C, D, E, etc. and eventually intend to work in the field of A, it is more difficult, and more challenging. It is difficult enough as it is already to go the direct way. Why are you putting more challenges in front of you to go the long way?

Zz.
 
  • #13
Your simple lesson there is good, because in my experience the opposite can be tossed around the physics department. The myth that a physics grad is more qualified to be an engineer than an engineering grad is often perpetuated by both physics students and professors.

When I went back to school for engineering after physics the only physics classes that counted toward engineering were the lower division university physics classes and one intro circuits class.
 
  • #14
ModusPwnd said:
The myth that a physics grad is more qualified to be an engineer than an engineering grad is often perpetuated by both physics students and professors.

You and I must revolve around very, very different circles. In all my years being involved with Academia and Academic staff, I had never heard of that argument! I have heard of argument being presented on why physics major CAN and possibly get into engineering (and similarly, the reverse), but NEVER heard that a physics grad is "more qualified" to be an engineer than an engineering grad.

I don't even know if this even require any kind of explanation. The fact that engineering and physics are two separate programs, even if they overlap a little, is ample evidence already.

Zz.
 
  • #15
I don't know... You work at Argonne right? I spent some time there. ;)
 
  • #16
ModusPwnd said:
I don't know... You work at Argonne right? I spent some time there. ;)

Then I'd like to know who at Argonne has that type of opinion, because I certainly haven't met any. And I've been here, on and off, since 1995.

Zz.
 
  • #17
lh9713 said:
when I think about the job I would like to have, the first thing that comes to my mind is engineering
Then study engineering.

When you travel, you first pick a destination and then you choose the best route to get there, you do not first pick a road and then hope that it leads to the destination you want.
 
  • #18
ZapperZ said:
but NEVER heard that a physics grad is "more qualified" to be an engineer than an engineering grad.

The only place I have heard that is here.
 
  • #19
If you only get a BS in physics future employers may think you had to stop your physics education because you were a very poor physics major and weren't allowed to go on for higher degrees. In that case the best you can do is get a job as a technician for real engineers!
 
  • #20
I got a dual BA degree in Physics and Math then went on to get an MS in EECS. This path has served me well in my lifetime career since it made it easy for me to adapt to several sub-career paths including computer programming and modeling, logic design, logic simulation and emulation, VLSI design and verification and engineering management. The only negative was having to take 12 undergrad units of EE before being admitted to an EECS program in grad school.
 
  • Like
Likes clope023
  • #21
I advise you to choose math and physics degree. Because most students don't have a very clear thought about what they are really interested in. And you may change your interests during college. If you choose math and physics as your major, you will have the chance to learn about much math and physics. Then if you find you really like math, you can apply for a math graduate program. If you like physics, you can continue to learn physics. If you find you like electromagnetic, maybe you can learn EE in graduate school. Or perhaps you like classical mechanics, you will be able to learn solid mechanics or fluid mechanics in graduate school.
But you are completely sure that you will try to become an engineer in the future and know what fields you really like, then you should choose it as your major in college. Otherwise, it's best to choose math and physics major.
Ps: I am a senior now. And I chose an engineering major. But I find I like physics more. However, it's very difficult for engineering students to apply for graduate program in physics, especially for a good university.
 
  • #22
It is hard to say which is the better choice. In fact, physics and engineering have different goals. A good physicist maybe not a good engineer and a good engineer maybe not a good physicist. The key is what you pursue.
 
  • #23
Hello, thank you all for your replies.
Sorry for replying this late, I have to choose soon a major soon and I still don't know what to do.
On one hand I am very drawn to research (the aerospace field is not my only interest) yet I feel like the engineering option is safer and I could still do research in grad school.
On the other hand, physics is more generic and I could work in various fields depending on my interests, as well as still do research in aerospace engineering or in physics if I manage to keep a perfect GPA.
Also, being realistic, I fear falling short for grad school. Having the engineering degree would have better job prospects than the physics one.
What do you think is the best fit?
 
  • #24
You sound like someone who doesn't know him/her self well enough to make a decision.

Here's a piece of advice: Don't worry about the job market. It is difficult everywhere. Don't worry about what your family thinks. This is YOUR decision. You make your own career. You can have a degree in Engineering and still not be employable or you can have a degree in Physics and then go off and make ridiculous money on Wall Street, if that's your thing.

This is your life and your career. Show some independence and... flip a coin if you can't make up your mind.
 

1. Is a bachelor in Physics sufficient for a career in Engineering?

No, a bachelor's degree in Physics is not enough for a career in Engineering. While both fields involve the study of natural phenomena, they have different focuses and skill sets. A degree in Engineering would provide a more direct path to a career in the field.

2. Will a degree in Physics help me in my Engineering studies?

Yes, a degree in Physics can provide a strong foundation for Engineering studies. Both fields involve a strong understanding of mathematics and problem-solving skills. Additionally, many engineering principles and concepts are based on the laws of physics.

3. Are there any advantages to having a degree in Physics before pursuing Engineering?

Yes, there are several advantages to having a degree in Physics before pursuing Engineering. Physics courses cover a wide range of topics, including mechanics, electricity, and thermodynamics, which are all relevant to engineering. Additionally, a degree in Physics can help develop critical thinking and analytical skills, which are essential for success in Engineering.

4. Can I switch from a Physics degree to an Engineering degree?

Yes, it is possible to switch from a Physics degree to an Engineering degree, but it may require additional coursework and time. Many universities offer transfer programs or dual degree options for students who want to switch from Physics to Engineering. Additionally, the strong foundation in mathematics and science from a Physics degree can make the transition to Engineering smoother.

5. Is a bachelor's degree in Physics a more challenging option compared to Engineering?

Both degrees require a significant amount of hard work and dedication, so it is subjective to say which is more challenging. However, Physics courses tend to be more theoretical and abstract, while Engineering courses are more practical and hands-on. It ultimately depends on the individual's strengths and interests.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
538
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
20
Views
512
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
29
Views
23K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
2K
Back
Top