You did divide by the time. Are you just asking whether that was the right thing to do? Yes, it is, and I agree with your answer.dawningparadox said:
haruspex said:
The mg is constant over the time period, so it must equal its own average. If you divide it by time it will no longer be a force, but something rather strange... mass times jerk, I guess.dawningparadox said:
haruspex said:
The average force is directly proportional to the exertion time of force. This means that as the exertion time increases, the average force also increases. Similarly, as the exertion time decreases, the average force decreases.
Yes, there is a limit to this relationship. The limit is determined by the physical capabilities of the object exerting the force. Once the exertion time reaches a certain point, the object may not be able to maintain the same level of force, resulting in a decrease in average force.
Yes, the type of force can have an impact on this relationship. For example, if the force being exerted is a constant force, the average force will be directly proportional to the exertion time. However, if the force is a variable force, the relationship may not be as straightforward.
Yes, the average force and exertion time can be manipulated to achieve a desired outcome. This can be done by adjusting the intensity and duration of the exertion, which can impact the average force exerted.
Yes, there are other factors that can influence this relationship, such as the angle of force, the mass of the object exerting the force, and the surface on which the force is being exerted. These factors can alter the amount of force needed to achieve a certain outcome and therefore impact the relationship between average force and exertion time.