A Is Chern number exactly an integer of half-integer?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohammad-gl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Berry phase
Mohammad-gl
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
I'm trying to calculate the Chern number for a specific system. When I calculate the Chern number, it's not an integer, for example, I have 0.9 for it. Is it the wrong result or can I consider it as 1?
I'm trying to calculate the Chern number for a specific system. When I calculate the Chern number, it's not an integer, for example, I have 0.9 for it. Is it the wrong result or can I consider it as 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is a "Chem number"? Google just gives me the phone number of a company called "Chem Care".
 
What is the system you are considering? In general, yes, it should be an integer.

You could have non-integer Chern numbers, for example, in a metallic system, because you do not have a gapped band structure at the Fermi level (Chern number non well defined in the conventional sense). But there are workarounds to still define an integer Chern number.

What methods are you using to calculate it? If it's just numerics you might adjust your code to get better results.
 
I'm usi
dRic2 said:
What is the system you are considering? In general, yes, it should be an integer.

You could have non-integer Chern numbers, for example, in a metallic system, because you do not have a gapped band structure at the Fermi level (Chern number non well defined in the conventional sense). But there are workarounds to still define an integer Chern number.

What methods are you using to calculate it? If it's just numerics you might adjust your code to get better results.
I'm using tight-binding Hamiltonian, Kubo formula and MATLAB programming language. Is it ok if I calculate Chern number 1.93 or 0.7?
 
Mohammad-gl said:
I'm usi

I'm using tight-binding Hamiltonian, Kubo formula and MATLAB programming language. Is it ok if I calculate Chern number 1.93 or 0.7?
Are you following a specific reference?
 
I'm using this paper.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.205416

Can you help me with Matlab codes? If you can I will send you the code maybe I made a mistake in coding.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top