Repeated often, but wrong.friend said:It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life.
Define complexity.friend said:Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
friend said:It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life. Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
No. Finetuning is often a hint that the underlying theory is missing a key assumption. Take for instance the epicykel theory in geocentric theories of the solar system. Those are highly finetuned, but this doesn't say anything about the complexity of our solar system; it says something about the completity of the epicykel theory.friend said:It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life. Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
I think things are more complex when there are more ways of combining things. I suppose this allows more possible states than otherwise. So does this mean that complexity allows there to be more entropy than otherwise? More possible states mean more entropy, right?mfb said:Define complexity.
What they usually omit to say is that it would disallow life as we know it. Nobody ever presented evidence that it would disallow any kind of life.friend said:It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life.
Entropy is related to (the lack of) order. Complexity is related to organization. Order and organization are not the same. Life is an organized disorder. See the Appendix in https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08341 .friend said:I think things are more complex when there are more ways of combining things. I suppose this allows more possible states than otherwise. So does this mean that complexity allows there to be more entropy than otherwise? More possible states mean more entropy, right?
Fine tuning maximized complexity refers to the concept that the universe and the laws of nature appear to be perfectly calibrated to allow for the existence of life and the development of complex systems. This suggests that the fundamental physical constants and parameters of the universe have been "fine-tuned" to an incredibly precise degree.
The measurement of fine tuning maximized complexity is a highly debated topic in physics and cosmology. Some scientists use the anthropic principle, which states that the universe must be compatible with the existence of observers (such as humans), as a way to measure the level of fine tuning. Others use mathematical models and simulations to analyze the probability of the universe having the precise conditions necessary for life to exist.
There are many examples of fine-tuning in the universe, including the strength of gravity, the energy density of the universe, and the balance between matter and antimatter. These parameters are incredibly precise and any slight deviation would result in a vastly different universe that would not be able to support life.
There are several theories that attempt to explain the fine tuning of the universe. One is the multiverse theory, which suggests that there are multiple universes with different physical laws and constants, and we happen to live in the one that is finely tuned for life. Another theory is the idea of a designer or creator who intentionally set the conditions for life to exist.
The concept of fine tuning maximized complexity is a highly debated topic in the scientific community. Some scientists argue that it is evidence of a higher power or intelligent designer, while others believe that it can be explained through natural processes. There is currently no consensus on the origins of fine tuning, and further research and evidence is needed to fully understand this phenomenon.