Trollfaz said:Do you think it is a good website for this?
RationalWiki is not considered a reliable source for academic or formal research. It is a wiki-based website that relies on user-generated content, which may not always be accurate or unbiased. However, it can be a useful starting point for exploring different perspectives and gathering general information on a topic.
RationalWiki promotes itself as a skeptical and rational website, but it has been accused of having a left-leaning bias. Its articles and editors tend to criticize conservative and right-wing ideologies, while promoting progressive and liberal ones. However, it also includes articles that critique and debunk left-wing beliefs and claims.
Yes, RationalWiki follows the same open editing model as Wikipedia, where anyone can create an account and start editing or contributing to articles. However, there are certain guidelines and rules in place to maintain the quality and accuracy of content.
No, the articles on RationalWiki are not peer-reviewed. They are written and edited by volunteers without any formal review process. However, users can suggest edits and provide sources to improve the accuracy and reliability of the content.
RationalWiki's main goal is to promote critical thinking, skepticism, and rationality. It aims to debunk pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, and other unfounded claims. It also provides a platform for discussing and analyzing current events, politics, and popular culture from a rational and evidence-based perspective.