Is tan: (-π/2, π/2) -> R a Homeomorphism?

In summary, it seems that tan is a homeomorphism where tan = sin/cos. To show that f and f^-1 are cts, it seems trivial from a sketch but how do you do it? For 1-1 tan(x) = tan(y) you need to know x = y. tan(x) = sinx.cosx = siny/cosy = tany. So sixcosy = sinycosx. This gets you sin(x-y) = 0. But x-y = pie. What's wrong here? Onto is obvious. There are infinitely many solutions to the equation sin t = 0... but not many that are consistent with the conditions of your problem
  • #1
Nusc
760
2
Show that tan: (-pie/2,pie/2)->R is a homeomorphism where tan = sin/cos

To show that f and f^-1 are cts, it seems trivial from a sketch but how do you do it?

For 1-1 tan(x) = tan(y)

Need to knwo x =y

tan(x) = sinx.cosx = siny/cosy = tany

=> sixcosy = sinycosx

this gets you sin(x-y) = 0
But x-y = pie

What's wrong here?

Onto is obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are infinitely many solutions to the equation sin t = 0... but not many that are consistent with the conditions of your problem.

(Incidentally, it's not just a homeomorphism, but also a diffeomorphism. That's easier to prove, since we're in dimension 1. :wink:)
 
  • #3
Then it must be 0 because the domain is the interval (-pie/2,pie/2)

So how do I show that f and f^-1 are cts?
 
  • #4
How have you defined them? e.g. showing tan to be continuous is trivial if you've defined sine and cosine via power series (or are allowed to use their power series)
 
  • #5
So for onto
for all y in R there exists an x in (-pie/2,pie/2) s.t. f(x)=y

WTS: tanx = y

Let y = siny/cosy = tany

let x = y => y = tany = tanx

is that sufficient? y could be inf.
 
  • #6
How can y be 'inf'? Neither is infinity in R, nor is pi/2 (pi does not have an e) in the interval (-pi/2,pi/2).
 
  • #7
So then how would you show f^-1 is cts ?
 
  • #8
Okay let me try again.

To show that f is cts pick an open subset G in R. then f-1 = arc tanx: R -> -pie/2, pie/2)

Suppose G is the interval (a,b).

Let f-1(G) = A. Thus A is contained in (-pie/2,pie/2)

f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b))=A

which is an open subset and therefore cts.

To show that the inverse of f is cts.

we want to show that for any open G in (-pie/2,pie/2) thus f-1(G) = A where A is open.

IF G = (a,b) then f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b)) = (tana,tanb) which is an open interval.

and hence cts.

Is this correct?
 
  • #9
Okay, is there anything wrong with it?
 

Related to Is tan: (-π/2, π/2) -> R a Homeomorphism?

1. What is a Sin t = 0 homeomorphism?

A Sin t = 0 homeomorphism is a mathematical concept used in topology, which is the study of geometric properties that are preserved through continuous deformations. It refers to a function that maps a topological space onto itself, where the mapping satisfies the condition that every point on the space remains fixed when t = 0.

2. How is a Sin t = 0 homeomorphism different from a regular homeomorphism?

A regular homeomorphism is a function that preserves the topological structure of a space, meaning that the open sets of the original space are also open sets in the mapped space. A Sin t = 0 homeomorphism, on the other hand, is a stricter condition that requires all points on the space to remain fixed when t = 0. This means that the mapping is not only continuous, but also preserves the identity of each point.

3. What are some real-world applications of Sin t = 0 homeomorphisms?

Sin t = 0 homeomorphisms have various applications in physics, particularly in the study of dynamical systems and chaos theory. They are also used in computer graphics and animation, where they can be used to create smooth and continuous transformations of objects. Additionally, Sin t = 0 homeomorphisms have been applied in image processing and data compression techniques.

4. Can a Sin t = 0 homeomorphism exist in higher dimensions?

Yes, a Sin t = 0 homeomorphism can exist in any number of dimensions. The concept of Sin t = 0 homeomorphism can be extended to higher dimensions, where the condition is that all points in the space remain fixed when all coordinates are set to 0. For example, in three dimensions, a Sin t = 0 homeomorphism would require all points to remain fixed when x = 0, y = 0, and z = 0.

5. Are there any limitations or restrictions to Sin t = 0 homeomorphisms?

Yes, there are some restrictions to Sin t = 0 homeomorphisms. One limitation is that the mapping must be continuous, meaning that it cannot have any sudden jumps or discontinuities. Additionally, the mapping must be bijective, meaning that each point on the space has a unique corresponding point on the mapped space. Lastly, the mapping must preserve the topology of the space, meaning that the open sets of the original space must still be open sets in the mapped space.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
973
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
899
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
860
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
809
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
605
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top