Iterative methods to solve linear system of equations

In summary, this shows that if ρ(M) ≥ 1, then there are x0 and c such that the iteration xk+1 = Mxk + c fails to converge.
  • #1
Sam80
1
0
Show that if (Spectral radius) ρ(M)≥1 then there are x0 and c such that the iteration xk+1 = Mxk+c fails to converge

I am very lost on how to solve this problem. All the literature I have been able to read up proves the converse of the statement. I am unable to crack this.

Show that if A is symmetric & positive definite then BSGS (Symmetric Gauss Seidel) is also symmetric and positive definite

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
uel's Answer:Let M be a matrix with spectral radius ρ(M) ≥ 1. We then have the iteration xk+1 = Mxk + c for some c in R.If this iteration fails to converge, then it must diverge to infinity.Assume, to reach a contradiction, that this iteration does converge.Then there exists constants K and N such that for all n > N, |xn+1 - xn| <= K.However, since ρ(M) >= 1, we have that |Mxn + c| >= |Mxn| - |c| > |Mxn| - K for all n > N.But this contradicts the assumption that |xn+1 - xn| <= K for all n > N.Therefore, if ρ(M) ≥ 1, then there exists x0 and c such that the iteration xk+1 = Mxk + c fails to converge.
 

1. What are iterative methods?

Iterative methods are mathematical algorithms used to approximate the solution to a problem by repeatedly improving an initial guess until it reaches a desired level of accuracy. In the context of solving linear systems of equations, iterative methods involve repeatedly updating a solution vector until it converges to the true solution.

2. How do iterative methods differ from direct methods?

Iterative methods differ from direct methods in that they do not require the entire system of equations to be solved at once. Instead, they work by repeatedly improving an initial guess for the solution. This makes them more suitable for large and sparse systems, where direct methods may be computationally expensive.

3. What are the advantages of using iterative methods?

One advantage of using iterative methods is that they can be more computationally efficient for large and sparse systems, as they only require a portion of the system to be solved at each iteration. Additionally, they can handle ill-conditioned systems better than direct methods, which may suffer from numerical instability.

4. What are some common iterative methods used to solve linear systems of equations?

Some common iterative methods used to solve linear systems of equations include the Jacobi method, Gauss-Seidel method, and successive over-relaxation (SOR) method. These methods differ in their approach to updating the solution vector at each iteration, but all aim to converge to the true solution.

5. How do you determine when an iterative method has converged?

An iterative method is considered to have converged when the difference between the current and previous approximation of the solution falls below a predefined tolerance level. This tolerance level is typically determined based on the desired accuracy of the solution. If the difference falls below the tolerance level, the method is considered to have converged and the current approximation is accepted as the solution.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
923
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
484
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top