Launching into space without fuel -- Please bare with me....

  • B
  • Thread starter Ryan davis
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fuel Space
In summary: It would be possible to build a space elevator, but it's not feasible at the moment because the cable would need to be much thinner at the surface.
  • #1
Ryan davis
1
0
So carbon nanotubes are incredible. Is a macrtube a possibility? If we stretched one out for centuries, and landed it on another planet, would it transfer gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can build a space elevator in principle, which is a very strong rope to an asteroid in orbit. Then you can build a capsule that crawls up and down the rope carrying whatever. I gather that there is debate over whether carbon nanotubes could be strong enough to do this or not.

You can't really extend the idea to travel to other planets, though, because they move relative to one another and occasionally the Sun is between us and them.

I don't know what you mean by "transfer gravity", but connecting two bodies by a thread has no effect on their gravitational fields - so whatever you mean, the answer is no.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes sysprog, berkeman, Dale and 2 others
  • #3
Ibix said:
You can build a space elevator in principle,
It's such an attractive idea but it would demand a lot from our technology and is probably just not feasible. The orbit of any object on the end of the elevator would beed to have a 24hour period or the 'rope' would wrap itself around the Earth. The end would have to be at the same altitude as Geosynchronous (TV etc. ) satellites. It's well worth Googling "Space Elevator" to find a lot of enthusiastic links which are usually not based too firmly on Engineering principles. Good fun tho'.

No good for connecting planet to planet, I'm afraid, for the reasons already given but it could save a lot of fuel if spacecraft started their interplanetary flight from geosynchronous altitude; it's the first few thousand km that uses up most rocket fuel.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #4
Only object pairs with a double tidal lock can be connected with a fixed space elevator: Both objects need to always face each other with the same side. The largest example in our Solar System is the Pluto/Charon system. We could connect them with existing materials without too much difficulty, apart from the effort of getting the cable there. We don't have an application for carrying large masses between them, however.

A space elevator for Earth would go to a counterweight some distance above geostationary orbit (36,000 km above the surface). Carbon nanotubes should be strong enough if we find a way to make them on a large scale. They'll still require significant tapering - at the surface the cable will be much thinner than at geostationary orbit where the tension is maximal.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

1. How is it possible to launch into space without fuel?

Launching into space without fuel is not possible with our current technology. Fuel is necessary to create the thrust needed to propel a spacecraft into orbit and beyond. However, there are ongoing research and development efforts to find alternative methods of propulsion that may require less or no fuel.

2. What are some potential alternative methods of propulsion for space travel?

Some potential alternative methods of propulsion for space travel include solar sails, nuclear propulsion, and ion propulsion. These methods use different forms of energy, such as solar radiation or nuclear reactions, to create thrust and propel a spacecraft through space.

3. Why is it important to find alternative methods of propulsion for space travel?

Finding alternative methods of propulsion for space travel is important for several reasons. First, it can reduce the cost of space missions by using less expensive or more abundant resources for propulsion. Second, it can reduce the environmental impact of space travel by using cleaner and more sustainable sources of energy. Finally, it can potentially increase the speed and efficiency of space travel, allowing us to explore deeper into space.

4. Are there any risks or challenges associated with launching into space without fuel?

Yes, there are significant risks and challenges associated with launching into space without fuel. One of the main challenges is finding a reliable and efficient alternative method of propulsion that can generate enough thrust to overcome Earth's gravity and reach the desired destination. There are also safety concerns and potential technical difficulties that need to be addressed before any alternative method of propulsion can be used for space travel.

5. When do scientists predict that we will be able to launch into space without fuel?

It is difficult to predict when we will be able to launch into space without fuel, as it depends on the progress of research and development in this field. However, some experts believe that we may see the first successful test of an alternative method of propulsion for space travel within the next decade, and it may become a viable option for space missions in the next 20-30 years.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
941
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
905
Replies
5
Views
432
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
850
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
6
Replies
191
Views
5K
Back
Top