Lens selection for close proximity surface photos

In summary, Sophie centaur and Andy Resnick suggest that a fisheye lens design could be used to take photos of a surface that is 5 mm away from a CMOS camera sensor. They advise that a scanner could be used to help with the optical design, and that performance requirements may vary depending on the application.
  • #1
Danmo
4
0
Good day all,

I am searching for some advice on how I could successfully take photos of a surface that is 5mm away from a CMOS camera sensor.

My ideas so far are;
1.) Find a lens with sub millimeter focal length (0.2mm by my calculations)
2.) Utilize mirrors to increase object distance
3.) Pin hole camera design

I have attached a sketch to illustrate.
 

Attachments

  • object distance.png
    object distance.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 137
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why not increase the object distance and use a longer lens?
And welcome to PF, by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes Danmo
  • #3
The vertical space allowed for the camera is approx. 15mm.

Oh, and thanks!
 
  • #4
Danmo said:
The vertical space allowed for the camera is approx. 15mm.

Oh, and thanks!
If you have a space to one side then you could use a 45 degree mirror and a long lens on your sensor. But then, I'm not sure about the usable field there would be. I guess the mirror would need to be curved (convex) and placed at the far side of the subject.

Only you know the actual geometry but I wonder what sort of distortion the arrangement in the diagram will produce - and what masking of the surface there could be, if it's not flat all over. Could there also be a question of available light and depth of focus, whatever system you choose?

A few more sketches are required.

A
 
  • Like
Likes Danmo
  • #5
Danmo said:
Summary:: Lens selection for short object distance

Good day all,

I am searching for some advice on how I could successfully take photos of a surface that is 5mm away from a CMOS camera sensor.

I have attached a sketch to illustrate.

This is going to be a very difficult design challenge, if your diagram is reasonably accurate- a 100mm diameter object placed 5 mm away subtends nearly 86 degrees (170 degree total field of view), so you are likely looking at a fisheye design with all the distortion that implies.

What about a 'door peeper' lens like this:

https://www.grainger.com/product/1H...ucid=N:N:PS:Paid:GGL:CSM-2295:4P7A1P:20501231

Not sure it will fit your space.

That said, you haven't specified some basic performance aspects: I assume this is visible light imaging, for example. Are there any optical performance requirements regarding throughput or resolution? What about the object illumination- is this a transmission or a reflected light situation?
 
  • Like
Likes Danmo
  • #6
Thank you both sophiecentaur and Andy Resnick for your input.

Great idea with the door peeper Andy, I will look into this!
And yes, the object will be illuminated by led lighting therefore is a reflected light situation.
 
  • #7
I wonder if the fisheye distortion can be (effectively) removed in software.,
 
  • #8
I believe you need to use a macro lens and a macro flash, it is best to use a tripod at the same time.
 
  • #9
I think your idea #2 is the best bet. Use a mirror to relay the image to where-ever the camera fits.

If you have never looked at the workings of a flatbed scanner, find a cheap or junked one and do so. Closest to the object surface there is a flat mirror. From there the path is a series of curved mirrors in a folded light path (3 or 4 mirrors if I recall correctly). The advantage of reflective optics is they don't have to be massive for short focal lengths, also no chromatic aberrations.

Of course a scanner uses a line sensor which is much shorter than the paper width, so the mirrors are curved in only one dimension. It sounds like you need area sensing though, so two-dimensional optics are needed. Anyhow, the optical path is light weight and compact -- just not as compact as you are after.

Is this for a production item or can one (a few) be sacrificed for one-off data collection?

Please keep us updated on you progress.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • #10
Mobile phone cameras are extremely thin and have increased in there ability to produce good results - May be a way forward
 
  • Informative
Likes Tom.G
  • #11
Perfidium said:
Mobile phone cameras are extremely thin and have increased in there ability to produce good results - May be a way forward
It would make a lot of sense if it were possible. I wonder if the lens may be too integrated for a one-off modification, tho’. The spec details would be important. It might be interesting.
 
  • Like
Likes Perfidium
  • #12
Or this type of thing for ideas
lots of this sort of thing about in various configs
eBay item number:
353209858759
 

1. What is the best lens for taking close-up photos of surfaces?

The best lens for taking close-up photos of surfaces is a macro lens. These lenses are specifically designed for close-up photography and have a high magnification power, allowing you to capture fine details and textures on surfaces.

2. How do I choose the right focal length for close-up surface photos?

The focal length of a lens determines how much of the scene you can capture in the frame. For close-up surface photos, a focal length of 50mm or higher is recommended. This will allow you to get close enough to the surface without distortion or blur.

3. Can I use a zoom lens for close-up surface photos?

While zoom lenses can be used for close-up surface photos, they are not as effective as macro lenses. Zoom lenses have a lower magnification power and may not be able to capture the fine details and textures of a surface as well as a macro lens.

4. Do I need a tripod for close-up surface photos?

Using a tripod is highly recommended for close-up surface photos. This will help keep your camera steady and prevent blurry images, especially when using a high magnification lens. A tripod also allows you to make precise adjustments to your composition.

5. Are there any specific camera settings I should use for close-up surface photos?

For close-up surface photos, it is important to use a small aperture (high f-stop number) to increase the depth of field and ensure that the entire surface is in focus. You may also need to use a slower shutter speed to compensate for the smaller aperture, so using a tripod is essential. Experiment with different ISO settings to find the best balance between image quality and noise.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
152
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top