Loophole-free demonstration of nonlocality?

[zonde]

This is an interesting paper that came out today that sort of relates to this thread:

Bell violation with entangled photons, free of the fair-sampling assumption
http://lanl.arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.0533.pdf

Interesting indeed.

From paper:
"Eberhard’s inequality, which was proposed almost two decades ago (14), is a CH-type
Bell-inequality (18) that explicitly includes also undetected (inconclusive) events."

Both papers are behind paywall .
But from the paper it seems like this Eberhard’s inequality is the same CH74 inequality. So does it add that stuff about QM predictions for non-maximally entangled state so that this η≈66.7% limit should be enough?

From paper:
"Quantum-mechanically, the maximal violation is given by J/N = (1–√2)/2≈–0.207 (22)"
So for η≈66.7% it should be J/N=0. And for ηA=73.77% and ηB=78.59% reported in the paper it should be somewhere in between. They report J/N=–0.00524 (but with very low deviation).

 

[DrChinese]

This is an interesting paper that came out today that sort of relates to this thread:

Bell violation with entangled photons, free of the fair-sampling assumption
http://lanl.arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.0533.pdf

I missed that you had posted this, and started a separate thread on the paper today.