Lumpiness & Disorder: A Physics Comparison

  • Thread starter andresordonez
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Disorder
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of lumpiness and entropy in the universe, as mentioned in "A Brief History of Time" by S. Hawking. While the book suggests that a lumpy universe corresponds to a disordered state, and a smooth universe corresponds to an ordered state, the conversation points out that this may not always be the case, as it depends on the type of force involved. The conversation also mentions the uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of entropy in general relativity.
  • #1
andresordonez
68
0
Hi, first of all I have to say that I know practically nothing about cosmology, though I know some basic physics.

The reason for this post is that while reading "A brief history of time" by S. Hawking, he mentions in some parts of the book that a lumpy universe corresponds to a disordered state, and a smooth universe correspond to an ordered state.

"But it could equally well have started out in a very lumpy and disordered state. In that case, the universe would already be in a state of complete disorder, so disorder could not increase with time."

"The universe would have started in a smooth and ordered state, and would become lumpy and disordered as time went on."

I think this is wrong, using the same analogy of the cup of water in a table that is used in the book

"Imagine a cup of water falling off a table and breaking into pieces on the floor. If you take a film of this, you can easily tell whether it is being run forward or backward. If you run it backward you will see the pieces suddenly gather themselves together off the floor and jump back to form a whole cup on the table."

it's easy to see that the cup of water on the table corresponds to an ordered state and the broken cup corresponds to a disordered state. Now, as I see it, the cup on the table is lumpier than the the broken cup, so the ordered state corresponds to the lumpy state, and the disordered state corresponds to the not so lumpy (smooth) state, and not vice-versa.

I think this would be a significant conceptual error, and it seems to me that he draws some conclusions about this. I just want to know if my reasoning is correct, and if I'm right, how much does this affect the ideas developed in the book.

PS: I know a lot has changed since this book was written and I should not consider this book as a very serious reference in cosmology.
If you see anything wrong with my English, please let me know.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
The correlation between lumpiness and entropy depends on the type of force. For a box full of gas molecules, which interact with one another repulsively, the maximum-entropy state is smooth. For an attractive interaction like Newtonian gravity, the maximum-entropy state is one in which all the mass is clumped at one point.

The correct definition and interpretation of entropy in general relativity is not completely well understood. A maximum-entropy cosmological state would probably be dominated by gravitational waves, not by matter.
 
  • #3
"The correlation between lumpiness and entropy depends on the type of force"

Thanks for your answer. That pretty much changes everything. Very interesting fact by the way.
 

1. What is the concept of lumpiness and disorder in physics?

Lumpiness and disorder are two fundamental concepts in physics that describe the arrangement of particles or objects in a system. Lumpiness refers to the uneven distribution or clustering of particles, while disorder refers to the randomness or lack of organization in the system.

2. How do lumpiness and disorder affect physical systems?

Lumpiness and disorder play a crucial role in determining the behavior and properties of physical systems. They can affect the flow of energy, the formation of structures, and the overall stability of the system.

3. How are lumpiness and disorder measured in physics?

Lumpiness and disorder can be quantified using various mathematical and statistical methods. For example, the degree of lumpiness can be measured using the concept of fractal dimensions, while the degree of disorder can be measured using the entropy of the system.

4. Can lumpiness and disorder be controlled or manipulated?

Yes, lumpiness and disorder can be controlled or manipulated in some physical systems. For example, in materials science, the arrangement of atoms can be controlled to create specific properties, such as strength or conductivity. In biological systems, organisms can also manipulate their environment to regulate the degree of lumpiness and disorder.

5. How are lumpiness and disorder related to other physical concepts?

Lumpiness and disorder are closely related to other physical concepts such as symmetry, phase transitions, and critical phenomena. They also have connections to other fields of science, such as chemistry, biology, and economics.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
731
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
973
  • Cosmology
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top