- #1
peace
- 44
- 4
- Homework Statement
- Calculate the mutual inductance between a very long, straight wire and a semicircular loop
- Relevant Equations
- B = µI/2πr
Φ = ∫B.dA
Last edited by a moderator:
I think your expression for Φ is correct. (I added parentheses in the denominator.) But the integration looks hard to me. I would avoid using polar coordinates r and θ. Can you think of another way to set up the integration over the semicircular area that takes advantage of the fact that B is independent of the vertical position inside the area?peace said:So the magnetic flux:
Φ = ∫B.dA= µI/2π ∫∫ rdrdθ /( R+rcosθ) .
Is this the correct solution?
I don't know exactly. There must be another way.TSny said:I think your expression for Φ is correct. (I added parentheses in the denominator.) But the integration looks hard to me. I would avoid using polar coordinates r and θ. Can you think of another way to set up the integration over the semicircular area that takes advantage of the fact that B is independent of the vertical position inside the area?
Vertical stripspeace said:I don't know exactly. There must be another way.
I don't think that can be done. I think the vertical strips are suitable for all shapes such as the square. But I try it now.TSny said:Vertical strips
What is the height of this vertical strip? The height is variable.TSny said:Vertical strips
is my steps correct?BvU said:There is an expression for lower bound and upper bound, as a function of distance from the wire. After that
you just ##\int B\cdot dA##...
peace said:What is the height of this vertical strip? The height is variable.
I turned your idea into the following shot:TSny said:View attachment 251804
Yes, the strip's height 2y depends on x. Can you find the functional dependence of y on x?
yes, i noticed my mistake in that equation right now. You are right.TSny said:Yes, looks good so far. You had a sign error in your first equation of post #10, but post #11 looks OK.
TSny said:Yes, looks good so far. You had a sign error in your first equation of post #10, but post #11 looks OK.
Yes. Good. Your x here is the same as the x in my figure of post #9. Try letting x = Rcos(2θ) and recall some trig identities. Note that we're very lucky that the distance from the wire to the loop is the same as the radius of the loop! Otherwise, the integrand would not have simplified to your expression above.peace said:The integral should be similar to the following integral:
Φ = µI/π ∫ (√R-x / √R+x) dx
Is there a way to achieve this integral?
Ok. but the problem is how x = Rcos(2θ) ...TSny said:Yes. Good. Your x here is the same as the x in my figure of post #9. Try letting x = Rcos(2θ) and recall some trig identities. Note that we're very lucky that the distance from the wire to the loop is the same as the radius of the loop! Otherwise, the integrand would not have simplified to your expression above.
Here, θ is not the polar coordinate angle. It's just a new variable of integration. I should have used a different symbol, say x = Rcos(2∅). So, you're switching the integration variable from x to ∅ by using this substitution.peace said:Ok. but the problem is how x = Rcos(2θ) ...
Should I put this x in the integral of Post #11?TSny said:Here, θ is not the polar coordinate angle. It's just a new variable of integration. I should have used a different symbol, say x = Rcos(2∅). So, you're switching the integration variable from x to ∅ by using this substitution.
No, use it the integral of post #14.peace said:Should I put this x in the integral of Post #11?
But I want to get integral of post #14 through integral of post #11.TSny said:No, use it the integral of post #14.
Yes, exactly. Because my professor said you have to reach integral of post #14.TSny said:Are you asking how the integral in #11 can be converted to the integral in #14?
How did you find that x is the same as x in post #9 ?TSny said:The symbol x has a different meaning in the two integrals. In post #11, you were letting x represent the distance shown here:
View attachment 251815But, in post #14, x represents the distance shown here:
View attachment 251816
Suppose we use a capital X for your distance in post 11 and a lower case x for the distance shown for post 14. Then your integral in post 11 would look the same except for using X instead of x. To get the integral for post 14, you need to change the variable of integration from X to x. What is the relation between X and x? Use this as a substitution to get from the integral in 11 to the integral in 14. Also, be sure to include the limits for the integrals.
This can be simplified to what you want. Factor the expression in the square root.peace said:X=R+x , dX=dx
so:
Φ = µI/π ∫ (√R^2 - x^2 / R+x ) dx .
But it's still different from the integral we want. But this seems to be the utmost similarity to the integral we want.
Φ = µI/π ∫ (√R^2 - x^2 / R+x ) dxTSny said:This can be simplified to what you want. Factor the expression in the square root.
could I use x from the beginning?TSny said:Good
You mean the x of post #9? Yes. Try it.peace said:could I use x from the beginning?
OK. Thank you very much for your great help.TSny said:You mean the x of post #9? Yes. Try it.
Mutual inductance is a measure of the ability of two conductors to induce a voltage in each other due to changes in current flow. It is a fundamental concept in electromagnetism and is often used in the design of electrical circuits and devices.
The mutual inductance between a very long, straight wire and a semicircular loop can be calculated using the formula M = μ0 * N1 * N2 * (π/2), where μ0 is the permeability of free space, N1 is the number of turns in the wire, and N2 is the number of turns in the loop.
Yes, the distance between the wire and loop does affect mutual inductance. The closer the wire and loop are to each other, the stronger the mutual inductance will be. This is because the magnetic field from the wire will have a greater impact on the loop when they are closer together.
The shape of the loop does not significantly affect mutual inductance. As long as the loop is symmetrical and the wire is very long and straight, the mutual inductance will be the same regardless of the shape of the loop.
Mutual inductance has many practical applications, including in transformers, motors, and generators. It is also used in wireless charging technology, where mutual inductance is used to transfer energy between two devices without the need for physical contact.