- #1
entanglement witness
- 2
- 0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing.
Hi!
I'm struggling with the following question:
Show that if n quantum states ρ1, ..., ρn are pairwise perfectly distinguishable, they are also jointly perfectly distinguishable.
Perfect distinguishability means that there is a set of psd matrices [tex]\{E_{1}, ..., E_{n}\},\, \sum_{i} E_{i} = \mathbb{1}[/tex] s.t. [tex] tr\left( E_{i} \rho_{j} \right) = \delta_{ij} [/tex]
I don't understand what exactly I have to show here. My assumption is that if for example [tex](E_{1}^{(2)}, \mathbb{1} - E_{1}^{(2)})[/tex] distinguishes ρ1 and ρ2, [tex](E_{1}^{(3)}, \mathbb{1} - E_1^{(3)})[/tex] ρ1 and ρ3 and so on, that [tex] E_{1}^{(2)} = ... = E_{1}^{(n)} =: E_{1}[/tex] (and likewise for all others), which would give the set I was looking for?
Now two states are perf. distinguishable if and only if [tex] \rho_{i} \rho_{j} = 0\, \forall i \neq j [/tex] i.e. the density matrices have orthogonal ranges. Since for psd matrices A, B [tex]tr(AB) = 0 \iff AB = 0[/tex] it follows that [tex]E_{1}^{(2)} \rho_{2} = ... = E_{1}^{(2)} \rho_{n} = 0 [/tex] the same for [tex] E_{1}^{(3)} ... E_{1}^{(n)}[/tex] thus [tex] E_{1}^{(2)} = ... = E_{1}^{(n)}[/tex]
But those are just my ideas. I hope somebody can explain how to tackle this correctly.
I'm struggling with the following question:
Show that if n quantum states ρ1, ..., ρn are pairwise perfectly distinguishable, they are also jointly perfectly distinguishable.
Perfect distinguishability means that there is a set of psd matrices [tex]\{E_{1}, ..., E_{n}\},\, \sum_{i} E_{i} = \mathbb{1}[/tex] s.t. [tex] tr\left( E_{i} \rho_{j} \right) = \delta_{ij} [/tex]
I don't understand what exactly I have to show here. My assumption is that if for example [tex](E_{1}^{(2)}, \mathbb{1} - E_{1}^{(2)})[/tex] distinguishes ρ1 and ρ2, [tex](E_{1}^{(3)}, \mathbb{1} - E_1^{(3)})[/tex] ρ1 and ρ3 and so on, that [tex] E_{1}^{(2)} = ... = E_{1}^{(n)} =: E_{1}[/tex] (and likewise for all others), which would give the set I was looking for?
Now two states are perf. distinguishable if and only if [tex] \rho_{i} \rho_{j} = 0\, \forall i \neq j [/tex] i.e. the density matrices have orthogonal ranges. Since for psd matrices A, B [tex]tr(AB) = 0 \iff AB = 0[/tex] it follows that [tex]E_{1}^{(2)} \rho_{2} = ... = E_{1}^{(2)} \rho_{n} = 0 [/tex] the same for [tex] E_{1}^{(3)} ... E_{1}^{(n)}[/tex] thus [tex] E_{1}^{(2)} = ... = E_{1}^{(n)}[/tex]
But those are just my ideas. I hope somebody can explain how to tackle this correctly.