Particle Accelerators and a 22 caliber bullet.

In summary, the Tevatron accelerator puts out a lot of energy and it is like putting the energy of the space shuttle launch into a 22 caliber bullet.
  • #1
cybernomad
18
0
I’m trying to help put the energies of particle accelerators say the Fermilab Tevatron accelerator into layman’s perspective. Now if we were to scale up the energy put into say a proton and scale that up to a 22 caliber bullet, how much more energy would it require?
Also put you answer in perspective with something like “it’s like putting the energy of the space shuttle launch into a 22 caliber bullet”
Assume the 40 grain bullet to 2000 fps (rifle).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lets take an energy of TeV (1 x 1012 ev, or 1.6022 × 10-7 J) for a proton of rest mass 1.6726 x 10-27 kg or rest mass-energy of 938.272 MeV, gives an specific energy of
9.579 x 1019J/kg (on the basis of rest mass). Remember that mass increases with speed.
Speaking of speed, a 1 TeV proton has speed about 0.9995 c, or 2.998 x 108 m/s >> 2200 ft/s (670 m/s).

The bullet moving at 2200 ft/s (670 m/s) has a specific kinetic energy of v2/2 = 224450 J/kg which <<< 9.579 x 1019J/kg.

On an energy basis though the bullet has greater kinetic energy - 584 J (based on 40 grains/2.6 g) vs. 1.6022 × 10-7 J. On the other hand, one only needs to accelerate 6.1 x 10-19 kg of protons to 1 TeV to obtain the some KE of 584 J.

As for the Shuttle - the 3 SSME's have a thrust of 5.3 MN and let's say that thrust is applied over 200 km, which gives an energy of 1.06 x 1012J (I have excluded contribution of SRB's). Putting this into a 0.0026 kg bullet gives a specific energy of 4.077 x 14 J/kg, which is still 5 orders of magnitude less than the specific energy achieved by a 1 TeV proton.

This may help to put energy in perspective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(energy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle#Technical_data

Also putting it another way using the equivalence of 11605 eV/K, a 1 TeV proton has a temperature of 11.605 x 1015 K, i.e. it is extremely hot! Compare this with about 3300 K in the SSME combustion chamber.
 
  • #3
That sounds all fine Astronuc but the average Joe on the street won't get it. How about putting it this way.

The amount of energy put into a particle in the Tevatron accelerator is like putting the energy of X Hiroshima bomb(s) into a 22 caliber bullet.

Te average Joe is familiar with both a bullet and the Hiroshima bomb but not with terms like, protons, rest mass, joules etc.
 
  • #4
The yield of "Little Boy" was about 13 kilotons of TNT equivalent in explosive force, i.e. 5.5×1013 joules = 55 TJ (terajoules).
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Putting the equivalent energy in a 0.0026 kg bullet (40 grain (2.6 g), 22 caliber) would give 9.8 x 1015 J/kg

And a 1 TeV proton has specific energy of 9.579 x 1019 J/kg,

so a 1 TeV proton has the equivalent energy of putting 9775 Little Boy's (bomb dropped on Hiroshima) in a 22 (40 grain) bullet, or one could round it about 10,000 Hiroshima bombs.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Astronuc said:
so a 1 TeV proton has the equivalent energy of putting 9775 Little Boy's (bomb dropped on Hiroshima) in a 22 (40 grain) bullet, or one could round it about 10,000 Hiroshima bombs.

thanks,


what prompted me to pose this question was a popular media news clip a few years back where they stated a extreme cosmic ray or was it a gamma ray burst:? had an estimate energy equal to an 40 mph or so "fast ball" (baseball). I felt they did an injustice in their comparison for a layman to grasp the magnitude of energy inputted into the particle. Now if my memory is correct they also stated that it was about 50 million times more energy than the Tevatron accelerator.

Now imagine trying to explain that!
 
  • #6
Astronuc said:
a 0.0026 gram bullet (40 grain, 22 caliber)

please check your calculations

1 grain = 0.065 grams
40 grains = 2.6 grams
 
  • #7
I corrected the typo. I was originally writing 2.6 grams, then intended to write 0.0026 kg, but instead wrote 0.0026 gram.
 
  • #8
cybernomad said:
what prompted me to pose this question was a popular media news clip a few years back where they stated a extreme cosmic ray or was it a gamma ray burst:? had an estimate energy equal to an 40 mph or so "fast ball" (baseball). I felt they did an injustice in their comparison for a layman to grasp the magnitude of energy inputted into the particle. Now if my memory is correct they also stated that it was about 50 million times more energy than the Tevatron accelerator.
Now imagine trying to explain that!

Yah, those are cosmic particles that are rather curious because their energies dance around this GZK limit. We aren't suppose to be observing such high energy particles unless their is a high energy source nearby (which there isn't unless we're REALLY missing something about our solar system...). I did a quick and crude calculation based on the speed those particles go and if you got a kg of material and you wanted to accelerate it to the speeds those protons come at... it would take something like 90,000,000,000 Tsar hydrogen bombs (Russian thermonuclear weapon, largest ever built with an energy equivalent to 50 megatons of tnt)
 
  • #9
cybernomad said:
I’m trying to help put the energies of particle accelerators say the Fermilab Tevatron accelerator into layman’s perspective. Now if we were to scale up the energy put into say a proton and scale that up to a 22 caliber bullet, how much more energy would it require?
I'm not sure scaling this way is meaningful or impressive. For example, the electrons in a TV picture tube travel at about a tenth the speed of light. If bullets went that fast, they would each have as much energy as a bomb.

Re the Tevatron, your average Joe or Jill understands neither how incredibly fast nor how incredibly tiny the protons are. But consider this: The tevatron can accelerate 10^13 protons to 1 TeV. That is an energy of a million joules circulating in the vacuum chamber. A million joules is the amount of energy it takes to bring a 3000 pound car to the top of a 30 story building. Think of it: If you shove this car off the building, the amount of energy it has when it hits the ground is the same as the amount of energy stored in this skinny 6km vacuum tube. Let it out all at once and this energy gets deposited in 21 millionths of a second. If it happens in an unprotected area, it's quite a catastrophe.
 
  • #10
Pengwuino said:
Yah, those are cosmic particles that are rather curious because their energies dance around this GZK limit. We aren't suppose to be observing such high energy particles unless their is a high energy source nearby (which there isn't unless we're REALLY missing something about our solar system...).

I don't read up on it much but I suspect some as of yet undetectable particles are involved, perhaps having to do with dark matter? well that's a different discussion.


I did a quick and crude calculation based on the speed those particles go and if you got a kg of material and you wanted to accelerate it to the speeds those protons come at... it would take something like 90,000,000,000 Tsar hydrogen bombs (Russian thermonuclear weapon, largest ever built with an energy equivalent to 50 megatons of tnt)

!
 
  • #11
krab said:
I'm not sure scaling this way is meaningful or impressive. For example, the electrons in a TV picture tube travel at about a tenth the speed of light. If bullets went that fast, they would each have as much energy as a bomb.

Well, how much of a bomb? I'd bet an average Joe or Jill would gain some perspective from such an comparison that may be indeed impressive into the nether world of the subatomic. What if that was your task; to try to explain it to your average Joe or Jill or a class of middle school students for that matter.


Re the Tevatron, your average Joe or Jill understands neither how incredibly fast nor how incredibly tiny the protons are.

Have you considered such scientists as Brian Greene, Michio Kaku or Carl Sagan who have to some degree able to explain to some deep scientific concepts to the common audience?


But consider this: The tevatron can accelerate 10^13 protons to 1 TeV. That is an energy of a million joules circulating in the vacuum chamber. A million joules is the amount of energy it takes to bring a 3000 pound car to the top of a 30 story building. Think of it: If you shove this car off the building, the amount of energy it has when it hits the ground is the same as the amount of energy stored in this skinny 6km vacuum tube. Let it out all at once and this energy gets deposited in 21 millionths of a second. If it happens in an unprotected area, it's quite a catastrophe.

Indeed.
 

1. What is a particle accelerator?

A particle accelerator is a scientific instrument used to accelerate charged particles, such as protons or electrons, to high speeds and energies. These particles are then collided with other particles or targets to study their properties and interactions.

2. How do particle accelerators work?

Particle accelerators use electromagnetic fields to accelerate particles and powerful magnets to steer them into a circular path. The particles are then accelerated further in stages until they reach the desired energy level.

3. Why are particle accelerators important?

Particle accelerators are important tools for scientists to study the fundamental building blocks of matter and the forces that govern them. They also have practical applications in fields such as medicine, industry, and energy production.

4. Can particle accelerators be dangerous?

Particle accelerators are designed and operated with strict safety protocols in place to prevent any harmful effects. However, there is always a small risk of accidents, so safety measures are continuously monitored and improved.

5. What does a 22 caliber bullet have to do with particle accelerators?

The 22 caliber bullet is often used as an analogy to help explain the concept of particle acceleration. Just as a bullet is propelled by the force of gunpowder, particles in a particle accelerator are accelerated by electromagnetic forces.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top