Photon energy argument against cell phones causing cancer

[Pengwuino]

I remember reading on this forum (probably) about how it was physically impossible for cell phones to cause damage to DNA. A microwave photon has energy in the meV range. My biology and chemistry aren't all that great, and what little I could properly google gave me the idea that molecular bonds are on the order of a few eV. If these numbers are right, it seems to make sense that microwave emissions from cell phones can't do damage in the sense that they directly screw with DNA to cause cancer (as is the typical public perception). Is this about right?

 

[aroc91]

Indeed. Microwave radiation is non-ionizing. It doesn't contain near enough energy to break bonds. The most a cell phone will do is heat up the water and in turn, the tissue in its general vicinity by a fraction of a degree.

 

[Pengwuino]

The thing I'm wondering is what the argument for cancer being caused by cell phones is? I want actual numbers and ... you know, science.

 

[Evo]

The thing I'm wondering is what the argument for cancer being caused by cell phones is? I want actual numbers and ... you know, science.

People love to scare themselves. Why do you think horor movies are so popular?

 

[LudusRex]

I can provide a response to the content regarding the photon energy argument against cell phones causing cancer. It is true that the energy of a microwave photon is in the meV range, while molecular bonds are on the order of a few eV. This means that the energy of a microwave photon is not high enough to directly break molecular bonds and cause damage to DNA.

However, it is important to note that the potential harm of cell phone use on human health is a complex issue and cannot be reduced to a simple comparison of photon energy and molecular bond energy. There are other factors at play, such as the duration and frequency of cell phone use, the proximity of the phone to the body, and the type of radiation emitted by cell phones.

While it may be true that microwave emissions from cell phones cannot directly damage DNA, there is still ongoing research and debate about the potential long-term effects of cell phone use on human health. Some studies have suggested a possible link between cell phone use and certain types of cancer, but more research is needed to fully understand the impact of cell phone radiation on human cells and tissues.

In conclusion, while the photon energy argument may provide some reassurance about the safety of cell phone use, it is important to continue studying and monitoring the potential health effects of this technology. As scientists, it is our responsibility to continue investigating and educating the public about the potential risks and benefits of emerging technologies.