Photon producing Electron-Positron pair's effect on c.

In summary, there is a misconception that photons can split into an Electron-Positron pair, but this is not true according to the Dyson Series in relativistic QFT. These ideas are drawn from heuristics and do not accurately represent the behavior of photons. It is important to study relativistic QFT to properly understand photons as they are far from everyday experience and cannot be adequately explained without mathematics.
  • #1
abilolado
23
7
Hello all, disclaimer here, I haven't taken quantum mechanics yet, all I know of it comes form books and PBS Space Time Series.

Since a photon can, at any given instant, "split" into an Electron-Positron pair, does it mean that if this occurs between point a and b, the measured speed o that photon would be lower than c? Because Electrons and Positrons cannot travel at c.
Thus, this effect would be magnified over large distances, as the photon would have many chances to split and recombine.
I still know little about the process, maybe because they are virtual particles this doesn't apply or something...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
abilolado said:
Since a photon can, at any given instant, "split" into an Electron-Positron pair

its a common misconception bought about by reading lay textbooks on QFT. Its not really true - so don't draw and conclusions from it.

It comes from interpreting in a heuristic way Feynman diagrams, But Feynman diagrams are pictorial representations of a so called Dyson Series:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_series

These ideas of splitting, positrons are electrons traveling back in time (that one is really a bit silly, it would also mean electrons are positrons traveling back in time - but its a heuristic picture we are stuck with), etc, are simply heuristics drawn from the diagrams - they sometimes help in solving and understanding problems- but are in fact wrong.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes abilolado
  • #3
You cannot understand photons without studying relativistic QFT. Photons are so far from anything we are used to in everyday experience that it is impossible to adequately speak about them in a non-mathematical way! Without math a lot of quantum physics is not communicable in an adequate way, and photons are among these topics.
 

1. How does the production of electron-positron pairs affect the speed of light (c)?

The production of electron-positron pairs does not directly affect the speed of light (c). The speed of light is a constant in a vacuum and is not affected by the presence of particles. However, the production of electron-positron pairs can indirectly impact the speed of light through interactions with other particles, such as photons.

2. Can the production of electron-positron pairs change the value of Planck's constant (h)?

No, the production of electron-positron pairs does not change the value of Planck's constant. Planck's constant is a fundamental constant in quantum mechanics and is not affected by the production of particles.

3. How does the production of electron-positron pairs affect the energy of a system?

The production of electron-positron pairs can increase the energy of a system. When a high-energy photon interacts with a nucleus or another high-energy particle, it can produce an electron-positron pair. This process transfers some of the energy from the photon to the newly created particles.

4. Is the production of electron-positron pairs a reversible process?

Yes, the production of electron-positron pairs is a reversible process. When an electron and a positron collide, they can annihilate each other and produce high-energy photons. This process is known as pair annihilation and is the reverse of the production of electron-positron pairs.

5. Can the production of electron-positron pairs occur spontaneously in a vacuum?

Yes, the production of electron-positron pairs can occur spontaneously in a vacuum through a process called vacuum polarization. This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon where a virtual electron-positron pair is created and then quickly annihilated, leaving behind a temporary electric field.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
896
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
643
Replies
46
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top