Physicist who Questioned Black Holes

In summary, the article discusses the views of Indian physicist Abhas Mitra on black holes and the loss of information, which he questioned long before Stephen Hawking agreed to the absence of Hawking radiation, an exact event boundary, and a black hole information paradox. Mitra argued that there was no evidence for Hawking radiation and that it would not be possible to detect it in the future. He also challenged the concept of an exact horizon and black hole. Mitra's views were further supported by Bekenstein's challenge to the information paradox in the 1980s.
  • #1
14,788
9,124
This is an article about the Indian physicist, Abhas Mitra, who questioned the theory of black holes and the loss of information long before Prof Hawking agreed that there is no Hawking radiation, no exact event boundary and no black hole information paradox.

“In my 2000 paper, I pointed out the fact that experimental physicists had failed to find any evidence for Hawking Radiation, and I predicted neither will be there any such evidence in [the] future because there could not be any exact horizon, any exact black hole in the first place,” the 62-year-old told Quartz in an email. “Accordingly, I exerted that there is really no Black Hole Information Paradox.”

https://qz.com/1229007/abhas-mitra-...ed-stephen-hawkings-theory-about-black-holes/
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #3
And his bio on Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhas_Mitra
 
  • #4
Black holes have been found, especially at galactic centers were they are huge - millions or billions of solar masses. As for detecting Hawking radiation, that would be extremely difficult since the amount is extremely small.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

[tex] estimate\ 9\times 10^{-29} \ W[/tex] for a black hole of 1 solar mass. It gets smaller for larger black holes.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I seem to recall that Bekenstein challenged the information paradox (that is, a seeming contradiction) as well, in the 1980s, and eventually persuaded Hawking what the answer to the paradox was.
 

1. What is a black hole?

A black hole is a region of space with a gravitational pull so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. This is due to the extreme curvature of space caused by a massive amount of matter being squeezed into a small space.

2. Who is the physicist who questioned black holes?

The physicist who questioned black holes is Stephen Hawking. He was a renowned theoretical physicist and cosmologist who made significant contributions to our understanding of black holes, gravity, and the origins of the universe.

3. What did Stephen Hawking's research on black holes reveal?

Hawking's research on black holes revealed that they emit radiation, now known as Hawking radiation, and eventually evaporate over time. This challenged the widely accepted belief that nothing could escape from a black hole.

4. Did Stephen Hawking's questioning of black holes change our understanding of them?

Yes, Hawking's questioning and subsequent research on black holes significantly changed our understanding of them. His work showed that black holes are not completely black and that they can emit radiation, which has implications for the theory of general relativity and the nature of the universe.

5. Why was there controversy surrounding Stephen Hawking's questioning of black holes?

Hawking's questioning of black holes was controversial because it challenged long-held beliefs about these astronomical objects and raised new questions and theories that were not yet fully understood. His ideas sparked debates and further research in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
585
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
193
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
833
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
759
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
832
Back
Top