Plane being tracked by radar

In summary: So the radial velocity is then just a function of the angle and the distance between the airplane and the radar?That works. So the radial velocity is then just a function of the angle and the distance between the airplane and the radar?
  • #1
Santilopez10
81
8
Homework Statement
A plane flies along a flat trajectory with constant velocity ##v##, at height h= 8km. It is followed by a radar placed exactly under the trajectory at an origin O.
Find:
a) Velocity at which the plane flies away from the radar as a function of time. What would be the equation as a function of the angle?
b) The cross component of the velocity vector (with O as fixed pole) as a function of time. What would be the equation as a function of the angle?
c) The time variation of the radial component of the velocity vector as a function of time. Find the equation as a function of angle aswell.
d) The angular acceleration as a function of time, and angle.
Relevant Equations
Kinematics equations in Polar and cartesian coordinates
I tried to workout the problem but I find motion in different coordinates systems a bit weird at the moment, so only thing I could do is realize that the x component of ##\vec r(t)## is: $$vt +x_0$$ but for simplicity we will use the initial condition ##x_0=0## so that ##t_0## is the moment the plane is 90 degrees with the radar. so: $$x=vt$$ and $$y= 8000 meters$$ so $$\vec r(t)=\begin{pmatrix} vt \\ 8000 \end{pmatrix} $$
It is obvious that the velocity at which the plane flies away from the radar is then ##v##. That is all I could do, any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the straight-line distance between the airplane and O? The rate of change of that distance would be the velocity they are looking for.
 
  • #3
FactChecker said:
What is the straight-line distance between the airplane and O? The rate of change of that distance would be the velocity they are looking for.
So I should use the fact that ##\vec r = |\vec r(t)|e_r## then ##\theta = \arctan{\frac {y(t)}{x(t)}}e_{\theta}## and use the equation ##\vec v = \dot r e_r + r \dot \theta e_{\theta}##?
 
  • #4
The question uses the term velocity to mean speed and the term velocity vector to indicate the vector ##\vec v##. This makes figuring out what is actually being asked for a bit difficult. I think the way to approach it is to think of parts a) and b) as hints for how to do parts c) and d). If you can solve parts c) and d), then you can go back and fill in something for a) and b). So how do you solve c) and d)?

As @FactChecker pointed out, you can find the radial velocity component by first writing an equation for ##|\vec r|## and then differentiating with respect to ##t##. You could use that result and the chain rule to get an expression for the radial velocity as a function of ##\theta##.
 
  • #5
So I used the fact that $$\dot r= \frac{{v_0}^2t}{r}$$ and $$\dot{\theta}= \frac{-8000v_0}{r^2}$$ so then $$\vec v= \frac{{v_0}^2t}{r}e_r -\frac{8000v_0}{r} e_{\theta}$$ (these would be my velocity components as a function of time right?) but ##t=\frac{x}{v_o}=\frac{r \cos{\theta}}{v_0}## and ##8000=r\sin{\theta}##. Plugging these in the velocity formula I get: $$\vec v=v_0 \cos{\theta}e_r - v_0 \sin{\theta}e_{\theta}$$
Which I guess is the velocity as a function of the angle.
Then I use the fact that the angular acceleration ##\ddot{\theta} = \frac {d\dot{\theta(t)}}{dt} = \frac{16000{v_0}^3 t}{r^4}## then I used same relations as before but I get that $$\ddot{\theta}=\frac{{v_0}^2 \sin{2\theta}}{r^2}$$ and I sense there is a mistake somewhere because I can not express the angular acceleration as a function of the angle because of that r^2. What do you think? thanks!
 
  • #6
Santilopez10 said:
Then I use the fact that the angular acceleration ##\ddot{\theta} = \frac {d\dot{\theta(t)}}{dt} = \frac{16000{v_0}^3 t}{r^4}## then I used same relations as before but I get that $$\ddot{\theta}=\frac{{v_0}^2 \sin{2\theta}}{r^2}$$ and I sense there is a mistake somewhere because I can not express the angular acceleration as a function of the angle because of that r^2. What do you think? thanks!
You have done well to this point.

You know ##r(x)## and ##x(\theta)##. What prevents you from expressing ##r^2## as a function of ##\theta##?

Once you get that, I think you still need to figure out ##\dot r(\theta)##.
 
  • #7
tnich said:
You have done well to this point.

You know ##r(x)## and ##x(\theta)##. What prevents you from expressing ##r^2## as a function of ##\theta##?

Once you get that, I think you still need to figure out ##\dot r(\theta)##.
What I did was ##r=\frac{8000}{\sin{\theta}}## then I plugged it in in the angular acceleration formula to get $$\ddot{\theta}(\theta)=\frac{{v_0}^2 \sin^{2}{\theta} \sin{2\theta}}{8000^2}$$
Is it correct? For the ##\dot r## part I know already that it is equal to ##v_0 \cos{\theta}##
 
  • Like
Likes tnich
  • #8
Santilopez10 said:
What I did was ##r=\frac{8000}{\sin{\theta}}## then I plugged it in in the angular acceleration formula to get $$\ddot{\theta}(\theta)=\frac{{v_0}^2 \sin^{2}{\theta} \sin{2\theta}}{8000^2}$$
Is it correct? For the ##\dot r## part I know already that it is equal to ##v_0 \cos{\theta}##
That works.
 
  • Like
Likes Santilopez10

1. How does radar track planes?

Radar uses radio waves to detect and track objects, including planes. When a radar signal hits a plane, some of the signal bounces back to the radar station, allowing it to determine the location, speed, and direction of the plane.

2. Can radar track planes in bad weather?

Yes, radar is able to track planes in bad weather conditions such as rain, fog, and snow. However, severe weather like thunderstorms can interfere with the radar signal and make tracking more difficult.

3. How accurate is radar tracking for planes?

The accuracy of radar tracking depends on several factors, including the type and quality of the radar system, the distance between the radar station and the plane, and external factors like weather conditions. Generally, radar can track planes with an accuracy of a few hundred meters.

4. Can radar track multiple planes at once?

Yes, modern radar systems are designed to track multiple planes simultaneously. They use advanced algorithms and techniques to differentiate and track each individual plane within their range.

5. Is radar the only way to track planes?

No, there are other methods for tracking planes, such as GPS and ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast). These methods use satellite and radio signals to determine the location of planes and can provide more accurate and real-time tracking compared to radar.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
285
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
182
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
237
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
270
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top