Prove A < B without Calculation Tools

In summary: Re: prove A<BIn summary, we can prove that $1001^{999}<1000^{1000}$ without the use of any calculation tools or the log function by recognizing that each term in the binomial expansion of $1001^{999}$ is less than $1000^{999}$, and therefore the entire summation is less than $1000^{1000}$. This ultimately proves that $A<B$.
  • #1
Albert1
1,221
0
A=$1001^{999}$

B=$1000^{1000}$

Prove :A<B

(note :any calculation tools are not allowed ,also no use of log function)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: prove A<B

I would use the binomial theorem to write:

\(\displaystyle 1001^{999}=(1000+1)^{999}=\sum_{k=0}^{999}{999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}\)

Since we have 1000 terms, and each term would have to be equal to $1000^{999}$ in order for the summation to be equal to $1000^{1000}$, yet for $0<k$ we find:

\(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}<1000^k\)

we may therefore conclude that:

\(\displaystyle 1001^{999}<1000^{1000}\)
 
  • #3
Re: prove A<B

Albert said:
A=$1001^{999}$

B=$1000^{1000}$

Prove :A<B

(note :any calculation tools are not allowed ,also no use of log function)
Are we allowed to use the fact that $\bigl(1+\frac1n\bigr)^n$ increases to $e$ as $n\to\infty$? If so, then $\bigl(1+\frac1n\bigr)^n < n+1$ whenever $n\geqslant2$. It follows that $(n+1)^n < (n+1)n^n$ and therefore $(n+1)^{n-1} < n^n.$
 
  • #4
Re: prove A&lt;B

MarkFL said:
I would use the binomial theorem to write:

\(\displaystyle 1001^{999}=(1000+1)^{999}=\sum_{k=0}^{999}{999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}\)

Since we have 1000 terms, and each term would have to be equal to $1000^{999}$ in order for the summation to be equal to $1000^{1000}$, yet for $0<k$ we find:

\(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}<1000^k\)

we may therefore conclude that:

\(\displaystyle 1001^{999}<1000^{1000}\)
as you are using \(\displaystyle 1000^k\)under sigma i think you can't compare \(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}\) with
\(\displaystyle 1000^k\)...:confused:

- - - Updated - - -

is it correct to use \(\displaystyle 1000^K\) under sigma
 
  • #5
Re: prove A<B

I like Opalg 's method (my solution is similar to his)
 
  • #6
Re: prove A&lt;B

mathworker said:
as you are using \(\displaystyle 1000^k\)under sigma i think you can't compare \(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}\) with
\(\displaystyle 1000^k\)...:confused:

- - - Updated - - -

is it correct to use \(\displaystyle 1000^K\) under sigma

My intended purpose was to recognize that for $0<k$, we have:

\(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}<1000^{999}\)

and since:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{999}1000^{999}=1000\cdot1000^{999}=1000^{1000}\)

we must therefore have:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{999}{999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}=1001^{999}<1000^{1000}\)
 
  • #7
Re: prove A&lt;B

MarkFL said:
My intended purpose was to recognize that for $0<k$, we have:

\(\displaystyle {999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}<1000^{999}\)

and since:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{999}1000^{999}=1000\cdot1000^{999}=1000^{1000}\)

we must therefore have:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{999}{999 \choose k}1000^{999-k}=1001^{999}<1000^{1000}\)

okay i got it, you are comparing each term to \(\displaystyle 1000^999\)...THANK YOU
 

1. What does "prove A < B without calculation tools" mean?

Proving A < B without calculation tools means using logical reasoning and mathematical principles to show that A is less than B without relying on any external tools or technology.

2. Why is it important to prove A < B without calculation tools?

Proving A < B without calculation tools is important because it allows for a deeper understanding and appreciation of the underlying mathematical concepts and principles. It also demonstrates a strong grasp of mathematical reasoning and critical thinking skills.

3. What are some techniques for proving A < B without calculation tools?

Some techniques for proving A < B without calculation tools include using geometric or algebraic properties, using inequalities and logical reasoning, and applying mathematical induction.

4. Can you provide an example of proving A < B without calculation tools?

Yes, for example, we can prove that 2 < 5 without using any calculation tools by showing that 2 is less than 5 on a number line, or by using the fact that 5 is equal to 2+3 and 2 is equal to 2+0, thus showing that 2 is less than 5 by the transitive property.

5. What are some benefits of being able to prove A < B without calculation tools?

Being able to prove A < B without calculation tools can improve one's logical reasoning and critical thinking skills, as well as deepen their understanding of mathematical concepts. It can also make problem-solving more efficient and effective, as it allows for alternative approaches and methods to be used.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
820
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
900
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
259
Back
Top