MHB Quadratic equations ( solving for zeros/roots) trickey

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the quadratic equation y = -2x^2 + 3x + 20 for its zeros. The initial attempt involved factoring and led to incorrect roots of x = 8 and x = -5. The correct approach involves factoring the equation as -(2x^2 - 3x - 20) and using grouping to arrive at the factors (x - 4)(2x + 5). This results in the correct zeros of x = 4 and x = -5/2. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing when to apply factoring techniques effectively.
miller1991
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
−2x^2+3x+20why is this equation so special it is in standard form, and when i solve for zeros
i factor down to

-1( 2x^2-3x-20)

factor
( 2x^2-3x-20)

factor by grouping 2(-20)=-40 what numbers multiple to equal -40 and add to equal -3

-8(5) = -40
-8+5= -3

and then just to find zeros the next step would be
(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5 BUT
thats not right apparently the answer is

x=4 x = -5/2

the answer i got here

(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5

is meant to be -1(2x+5)(x-4)

which gives
x=4 x = -5/2 but like 5+-4 =1 don't even equal -3

apparently if i use the huge equation to solve for zeros that works but
why did (2x+5)(x-4) using this work, and how to i recognize when to use it like that
and i don't even know where they pulled the 5 and -4 fromdoes anyone know why when solving for zeros
y=-2x^2 +3x+20
is a tricky question
p.s
originally the question was solve zeros for
y=3x+20 -2x^2
but putting it in standard form was easy and i don't think that messes with the final answer
thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
miller1991 said:
factor by grouping 2(-20)=-40 what numbers multiple to equal -40 and add to equal -3

-8(5) = -40
-8+5= -3

and then just to find zeros the next step would be
(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5

You have the right idea!
You are trying to factor
$-2x^2+3x+20$
Factor out the negative (like you did).
$-(2x^2-3x-20)$
Then you determined the values you are working with are 8 and -5. That tells you how to "re-write" your equation so that is set up in a way that you can factor by grouping.
$2x^2-3x-20 = 2x^2+5x-8x-20$
Now factor by grouping.
$2x^2+5x-8x-20 = x(2x+5)-4(2x+5)=(x-4)(2x+5)$
Giving,
$x=4, x=-\frac{5}{2}$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top