I Quantum field in curved space-time

Gary Venter
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Quick question about relationship between QM and general relativity
The wave function includes coordinates for position in space. For two distant but correlated particles, do their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function follow the curved space-time of general relativity, or is Euclidean distance assumed in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I support neither of your idea : Eucledian distance does not fit with GR and classical curved space-time doe s not seem fit with QM. If you could get an answer, you would be honerd as a pioneer of quamtum gravity.
 
Gary Venter said:
The wave function includes coordinates for position in space.
Here you are using non-relativistic QM.

Gary Venter said:
For two distant but correlated particles, do their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function follow the curved space-time of general relativity
Here you are trying to use relativity, which means you can't use non-relativistic QM. You have to use quantum field theory, and in curved spacetime to boot, in which there is no such thing as a "wave function". That's not how QFT models things.
 
Gary Venter said:
their distances and paths of movement used in the wave function
There are no such things even in non-relativistic QM. The wave function does not describe "distances and paths of movement".
 
  • Like
Likes gentlevandal
Gary Venter said:
TL;DR Summary: Quick question about relationship between QM and general relativity

or is Euclidean distance assumed in QM?
No. In quantum theory on curved spacetime, a curved geometry is used.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and pines-demon
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Back
Top