Quantum mechanical one-liners?

In summary,The "one liner" that can change your mind set is this: Classical objects usually can be visualized, quantum objects usually can't.
  • #1
sadaronjiggasha
17
14
I got a one liner for QP, Electron behave like wave when no observer is there but when we put observer ELECTRON saw this and they told themself hey they are observing us lets change our behaviour, WE are particle now. That type of strange QP is. Am I right?
 
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes Motore and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I strongly suggest you learn QM before you attempt to explain it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and phinds
  • #3
No matter how much I study QP is still mind boggling. I am not explaining QP I am telling what I am thinking. I want to understand QP better way.
 
  • #4
sadaronjiggasha said:
Like in double slit experiment when several eletron shooted and the pattern in the wall created, it hard to understand why that happen but when I saw video of water flowing into double slit and created the same pattern than it was so easy to understand. Visual representation of anything is very easy to understand.
sadaronjiggasha said:
I am looking for something even may be one liner that will dramatically change my way of thinking. Putting all clasical physics behind me only thinking quantum way. Because I always try to understand anything by real life example. Then I can understand easily. But when I can't find any real life example I can't related to that. As QP physics does not relate to general physics I always mixed up QP to classic physics. How can I change that mind set?
Perhaps a "one liner" that can change your mind set is this:
Classical objects usually can be visualized, quantum objects usually can't.

Or if you can't accept that they can't be visualized, then a useful alternative framework for thinking is the Bohmian interpretation. In this framework, quantum phenomena are explained by some kind of "ghosts", that is, classically looking objects that can be visualized in mind, but that can't be seen in actual experiments. As you may guess, since these "ghosts" can't be seen in experiments, most physicists don't believe in them. Nevertheless, they can be a useful tool for thinking if visualization is what you are looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen, Lord Jestocost and sadaronjiggasha
  • #5
@Demystifier Thank you so much. Excellent explanation. You understanding me well. Yes I am looking for this. The "Ghosts". Thanks again.
 
  • Love
Likes Demystifier
  • #6
  • Like
Likes sadaronjiggasha
  • #7
sadaronjiggasha said:
I got a one liner for QP, Electron behave like wave when no observer is there but when we put observer ELECTRON saw this and they told themself hey they are observing us lets change our behaviour, WE are particle now. That type of strange QP is. Am I right?
No.
This idea that observation makes something change from wave to particle was abandoned almost a century ago, and is it's one of the first things that you have to unlearn if you want to understand QM.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
  • #8
sadaronjiggasha said:
No matter how much I study QP is still mind boggling.
Try 6 hours a day, six days a week for six months and see whether that makes any difference.
sadaronjiggasha said:
I want to understand QP better way.
See above.
 
  • #9
My sincere apologies for writing a reply here, I should not as I am not a physicist... However, I came across this thread and... because I have been trying to follow how our understanding of the Universe progresses for more than three decades, would like to share my opinion on QP and QM.

I am an amateur. From this very small perspective I can only say, that mankind is quite far from understanding the simplicity of the Universe. There are many things which do not seem to add together, more and more theories, more resources needed to make a small progress - like the LHC for example.

There is a wonderful simplicity on the fundamental level of the Universe we are living in. Understanding this simplicity, which can potentially open a completely new door for mankind in this enormously big Universe, requires a different approach, in my opinion.

The question is - will spending more and more time on trying to solve a constantly growing puzzle will finally bring mankind to a higher level in this Universe? I think this forum is a very good example of how complex problems are in today's world. So, is this the only direction to follow?
 
  • #10
thewowsignal said:
So, is this the only direction to follow?
Only yesterday I was saying that physics is about calculations, not mysticism.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, vanhees71 and martinbn
  • #11
This thread is closed as the OP is word salad. It is being left visible because the responses are far more useful than the OP itself.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, phinds, Bystander and 2 others

1. What is a quantum mechanical one-liner?

A quantum mechanical one-liner is a short and concise statement that captures a fundamental concept or principle of quantum mechanics, a branch of physics that studies the behavior of matter and energy at a microscopic level.

2. How are quantum mechanical one-liners different from regular one-liners?

Quantum mechanical one-liners are different from regular one-liners in that they are based on the principles of quantum mechanics, which describe the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level. Regular one-liners, on the other hand, are often used as jokes or clever statements.

3. Can quantum mechanical one-liners be understood by non-scientists?

While some quantum mechanical one-liners may require a basic understanding of physics, there are many that can be understood by non-scientists. These one-liners often use analogies or everyday examples to explain complex concepts in a simple way.

4. How can quantum mechanical one-liners be useful?

Quantum mechanical one-liners can be useful for scientists to communicate complex ideas in a concise and memorable way. They can also help to spark interest and curiosity in the general public about the fascinating world of quantum mechanics.

5. Can quantum mechanical one-liners be used to solve real-world problems?

While quantum mechanical one-liners may not directly solve real-world problems, they can inspire new ways of thinking and approaching problems, especially in the field of quantum computing. These one-liners often challenge our understanding of reality and push us to think outside the box.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
986
Replies
6
Views
823
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
124
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
993
Back
Top