Question about Penning Trap

  • I
  • Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date
  • #1
kelly0303
561
33
Hello! My question is related to a cylindrical Penning trap, with 5 electrodes (eventually each one can be divided in several parts, usually 2 or 4). I want to apply a sinusoidal electric field at the center of the trap, such that a particle inside the trap (we can assume we care only about the axial direction) feels this sinusoidal field anywhere inside a ##\sim \pm 1## mm axial amplitude (the frequency of the field will be different, much smaller, than the axial field of the trap). I ran some simulations and applying voltages to some of the electrodes in a sinusoidal fashion doesn't do what I want, as the amplitude felt by the ion in the trap is different at different axial positions, basically the ion feels something of the form:

$$A(z)sin(\omega t)$$
while I need the amplitude of the external field to not change with position. Is there a way to achieve this?

Just to clarify a bit, if I were to have a laser, with the frequency I need (the frequency I need is in RF, so no laser would do this, but let's assume we would have such a laser) and send it inside the trap, the field felt by the ion would have the same amplitude in a volume much smaller than the laser wavelength (this is the idea behind the approximations made when using lasers in the optical regime applied to atoms, where the size of the atom is much smaller than the wavelength of the laser). I would like to achieve something similar in my case if possible. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

It sounds like you are trying to create a homogeneous electric field within the trap, where the amplitude of the field does not change with position. This can be achieved by properly adjusting the voltages applied to the electrodes in the trap.

One way to achieve this is by using a technique called "electrostatic modulation." This involves applying a high-frequency (RF) voltage to one of the electrodes, while simultaneously applying a lower-frequency voltage to the other electrodes. This creates a time-varying electric field that can be adjusted to have a constant amplitude at any point within the trap.

Another option is to use a combination of DC and RF voltages on the electrodes to create a quadrupole electric field, which is homogeneous in the center of the trap. This field can then be modulated with a sinusoidal RF voltage to achieve the desired effect.

In either case, it is important to carefully design and adjust the voltages applied to the electrodes to achieve the desired field within the trap. It may also be helpful to consult with a physicist or expert in Penning traps for further guidance and assistance with your specific setup.
 

1. What is a Penning Trap?

A Penning trap is a type of electromagnetic device used in physics research to trap and study charged particles. It was invented by physicist Frans Michel Penning in the 1930s.

2. How does a Penning Trap work?

A Penning trap uses a combination of electric and magnetic fields to trap charged particles in a circular motion. The electric field keeps the particles confined in the center, while the magnetic field causes them to move in a circular path.

3. What are the applications of Penning Traps?

Penning traps are used in a variety of research fields, including nuclear and atomic physics, quantum computing, and precision measurements. They are also used in mass spectrometry to determine the mass of particles.

4. What are the advantages of using a Penning Trap?

One of the main advantages of using a Penning trap is its ability to trap and study individual particles, making it useful for precision measurements and studying fundamental particles. It also allows for long trapping times, giving researchers more time to study the particles.

5. Are there any limitations to using a Penning Trap?

One limitation of Penning traps is that they can only trap charged particles, so they cannot be used for neutral particles. They also require a high level of technical expertise to operate and maintain, making them more expensive to use compared to other particle traps.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
940
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
975
Replies
6
Views
799
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
931
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
886
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
871
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
559
Back
Top