Question regarding radius of circular paths (chapter the nucleus)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a question about calculating the radius of circular paths for electrons in a magnetic field after they gain kinetic energy from an electric potential. The key formula presented is eV = 1/2 mv², which allows for the calculation of the electrons' velocity. It is explained that when electrons enter a magnetic field perpendicularly, they move in circular paths due to the magnetic force acting as the centripetal force. The relationship between the magnetic force and centripetal force is expressed as F = -e(VxB) = m(v²/R), leading to the calculation of the beam's radius. The participants express appreciation for the clarification provided in the explanation.
Sanosuke Sagara
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I have my doubt,solution and question in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
OK the problem with your solution is that You have made it a bit too complicated.
First of all ,
After accelerating through a potential , the electrons gain certain amount of K.E , which can be calculate din the following way:

eV= \frac{1}{2}mv^2

From The KE , calculate velocity gained by the electron beam.

Now if you have studied how charged particles behave in magnetic fields, you should know that electrons when enter prependicular to a magnetic field, start moving in a circle.

Force due to a Magnetic field on an electron provides the centripedal force necessary for moving in circle. therefore,

<br /> F= -e(VxB) = m \frac{v^2}{R}<br />

From here calculate the radius of the beam...easy ..isnt it?
 
Yes,Dr Brain.Thanks for your help and I really appreciate it.Thanks again for your explanation in detail.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top