- #1
khurramc
- 1
- 0
The Hubble's Law is based on empirical evidence that those objects further from us are moving away from us proportionate to their distance from us.
My question is that the further we look back the further we look back in time. And so, why is that when we see further, and notice objects moving away faster, do we state that the universe is expanding?
I mean even in a universe that was not expanding, wouldn't objects back in time (and therefore further from us) be moving faster than objects nearer to us just because of the speed of light and the fact that our view further into the universe is but a picture of how the universe was in the past?
I understand that objects further away from us are moving away faster. I am just concerned with the fact, that would that not be natural if you were looking back in time to an explosion slowing down and a universe not expanding? Since even if expansion was slowing down, we would notice that objects further way would depict speeds of expansion in the past, while objects closer would reflect speeds closer to the present. Therefore, if the the expansion was slowing down, wouldn't objects further depict a faster speed than objects closer?
Any explanations to my query would be much appreciated.
Regards
Khurram Chaudhry
My question is that the further we look back the further we look back in time. And so, why is that when we see further, and notice objects moving away faster, do we state that the universe is expanding?
I mean even in a universe that was not expanding, wouldn't objects back in time (and therefore further from us) be moving faster than objects nearer to us just because of the speed of light and the fact that our view further into the universe is but a picture of how the universe was in the past?
I understand that objects further away from us are moving away faster. I am just concerned with the fact, that would that not be natural if you were looking back in time to an explosion slowing down and a universe not expanding? Since even if expansion was slowing down, we would notice that objects further way would depict speeds of expansion in the past, while objects closer would reflect speeds closer to the present. Therefore, if the the expansion was slowing down, wouldn't objects further depict a faster speed than objects closer?
Any explanations to my query would be much appreciated.
Regards
Khurram Chaudhry