Quick question on calculating time constant RC?

In summary, when calculating the time constant for an RC circuit with a 100 ohm resistor and a parallel equivalent resistance of 66.7 ohms, the resistors are treated as being in parallel because that is the equivalent resistance the "source network" presents to the capacitor. To find this value, you can use the Thevenin equivalent or imagine the circuit settling over time and replacing the battery with a wire. This method is necessary to solve the problem.
  • #1
letsgo
20
0

Homework Statement



If you have this RC Circuit (ignore the yellow path of current):

http://i.imgur.com/Mi2bj.png

When you are calculating time constant=RC, what would you use for R?
R1=100 ohms, or Req=300 ohms


Homework Equations



time constant = RC

The Attempt at a Solution



I would think its just the 100 ohms, because initially, the current is only flowing through that resistor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The 200 Ω resistor is in parallel with the capacitor, so you can swap their positions without changing the circuit in any way. If you do that, consider the equivalent resistance that the capacitor "sees" from the network feeding it (Think Thevenin equivalent).

attachment.php?attachmentid=52498&stc=1&d=1351652265.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 1,086
  • #3
gneill said:
The 200 Ω resistor is in parallel with the capacitor, so you can swap their positions without changing the circuit in any way. If you do that, consider the equivalent resistance that the capacitor "sees" from the network feeding it (Think Thevenin equivalent).

attachment.php?attachmentid=52498&stc=1&d=1351652265.gif
Can you PLEASE just answer the question... Is it 100 ohms or 300 ohms...? PLEASE.
 
  • #4
letsgo said:
Can you PLEASE just answer the question... Is it 100 ohms or 300 ohms...? PLEASE.

Sorry, that's not how it works here. We can't just provide answers to homework questions, we can only help you to work them out yourself via hints, corrections, or suggestions.

I can tell you that it's neither 100 nor 300 ohms...
 
  • #5
gneill said:
Sorry, that's not how it works here. We can't just provide answers to homework questions, we can only help you to work them out yourself via hints, corrections, or suggestions.

I can tell you that it's neither 100 nor 300 ohms...
Okay, so its 75 ohms, because you treated them as parallel. But why did you treat them as parallel?
 
  • #6
letsgo said:
Okay, so its 75 ohms, because you treated them as parallel. But why did you treat them as parallel?

Check your math: 100||200 is not 75.

They are treated as being in parallel because that is the equivalent resistance that the "source network" presents to the capacitor.

The usual approach to finding this value is to find the Thevenin equivalent of the network that the capacitor is connected to. However, in this case a thought experiment might suffice. Imagine that the circuit is allowed to settle over time and that the capacitor has reached its full charge. Now, at some time we'll call t = 0, the battery is replaced by a short circuit (effectively, the voltage source becomes 0V). Nothing else in the circuit involving capacitors or resistors has changed so the time constant should be the same as before. What's the time constant for this case? Can you now tell that the resistors are in parallel?
 
  • #7
gneill said:
Check your math: 100||200 is not 75.

They are treated as being in parallel because that is the equivalent resistance that the "source network" presents to the capacitor.

The usual approach to finding this value is to find the Thevenin equivalent of the network that the capacitor is connected to. However, in this case a thought experiment might suffice. Imagine that the circuit is allowed to settle over time and that the capacitor has reached its full charge. Now, at some time we'll call t = 0, the battery is replaced by a short circuit (effectively, the voltage source becomes 0V). Nothing else in the circuit involving capacitors or resistors has changed so the time constant should be the same as before. What's the time constant for this case? Can you now tell that the resistors are in parallel?
Okay, 66.7 ohms, my bad.

But no, I still don't see it. Because the way I see it, is if you're not considering the capacitor, then the resistors ARE in series. Because the current goes from the source to 200 to 100. There is no junction. See but this is when the circuit is in a steady state. Otherwise, immediately after, the capacitor would work as a wire and the current would bypass the 200 resistor, making only the 100 resistor count. So what I want to know, is when you're finding the time constant, do you take the resistance immediately after or when its in a steady state? I'm confused. :cry:
 
  • #8
letsgo said:
Okay, 66.7 ohms, my bad.

But no, I still don't see it. Because the way I see it, is if you're not considering the capacitor, then the resistors ARE in series. Because the current goes from the source to 200 to 100. There is no junction. See but this is when the circuit is in a steady state. Otherwise, immediately after, the capacitor would work as a wire and the current would bypass the 200 resistor, making only the 100 resistor count. So what I want to know, is when you're finding the time constant, do you take the resistance immediately after or when its in a steady state? I'm confused. :cry:

No, the capacitor is still there, it's the battery that you replace with a short (wire). The capacitor then "sees" two resistors in parallel.

Also, the 200 Ω resistor always "counts" because immediately after current begins to flow (no matter how small the time interval), any charge on the capacitor will place a potential across the 200 Ω resistor, which must then carry some current.
 
  • #9
gneill said:
No, the capacitor is still there, it's the battery that you replace with a short (wire). The capacitor then "sees" two resistors in parallel.

Also, the 200 Ω resistor always "counts" because immediately after current begins to flow (no matter how small the time interval), any charge on the capacitor will place a potential across the 200 Ω resistor, which must then carry some current.
I finally get it. :eek:

Thank you! So this method of replacing the battery with a wire and remaking the circuit (the image you supplied me with), is this what finding the Thevinin equivalent is (I haven't learned this yet), and is this something that you have to do to solve this problem?
 
  • #10
letsgo said:
I finally get it. :eek:

Thank you! So this method of replacing the battery with a wire and remaking the circuit (the image you supplied me with), is this what finding the Thevinin equivalent is (I haven't learned this yet), and is this something that you have to do to solve this problem?

Any network of resistors and power supplies (voltages and/or currents) that provides some output at a pair of terminals can be replaced with an equivalent circuit model consisting of a voltage source in series with a single resistance. This is called its Thevenin Equivalent. In this case the "pair of terminals" happens to be where the capacitor connects, and we're concerned with the equivalent resistance of the network (Thevenin Resistance) so we can use it to determine the RC time constant.

The procedure for finding the Thevenin model for a network consists of two parts. The first is to find the open-circuit voltage at the output terminals (remove and load -- in this case remove the capacitor and find the voltage at the open terminals). This is called the Thevenin Voltage. The second step is to "suppress" any sources by replacing any voltage supplies with shorts and removing any current supplies, then finding the equivalent resistance at the output terminals. This gives the Thevenin Resistance.

The isn't the only possible approach to the problem. An alternative would be to write Kirchhoff's Laws equations and solve the resulting differential equations for the capacitor current or voltage. The time constant would pop out of that. Your choice :smile:
 

Related to Quick question on calculating time constant RC?

1. What is the formula for calculating time constant RC?

The formula for calculating time constant RC is RC = R x C, where R is the resistance in ohms and C is the capacitance in farads.

2. How do I know what values to use for R and C?

The values for R and C can vary depending on the specific circuit you are working with. In general, R and C should be chosen so that the product RC is in the range of 0.1 to 1 second for a reasonable time constant.

3. How is time constant RC related to the behavior of a circuit?

The time constant RC determines how quickly a capacitor charges or discharges in a circuit. A larger time constant means a slower charging or discharging process, while a smaller time constant results in a faster process.

4. Can time constant RC be used to calculate the voltage across a capacitor?

Yes, the voltage across a capacitor can be calculated using the formula V = V0 (1 - e^(-t/RC)), where V0 is the initial voltage and t is the time elapsed.

5. Are there any limitations to using time constant RC in circuit analysis?

While time constant RC can be a useful tool in circuit analysis, it is important to note that it assumes ideal conditions and may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios. Additionally, it may not be applicable in circuits with non-linear elements or complex components.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top