- #1
Xira
- 4
- 0
Hi. I am just a biologist with an interest in theoretical physics. Please, jump up and down on my wrongness:) This is the gist of a conversation on the subject of a holo stealth field that was never replied to in a games forum for a game I played at one point.
Essentially the question is "Is a solidstate quantum detector in a nearly closed system capable of detecting?" Thats not technically correct, but yes, a quantum computer would fix the delay problem.
Quantum computers can in this case calculate the probability of photon intensity, giving the probable image the minute it is detected. The only delay in the system would be how fast the sensors can detect photons and how fast the holographic emiters can generate them.
Dam was hopeing nobody would catch that I just pulled that out of thin air:)
Am a geneticist, not a quantum physicist!
If you actually understand this stuff, I have some more questions for you. Essentially as I (Actually not made up) understand it such a system would calculate the photon's probale location at area X if it has come in through photon detector Y because it could have passed through the object with whatever irrelivantly small probability.
Which is to say that by observeing the diffrence in the result matrix of what is actually and what could have been had the photon from detector Y passed through the entire object it can in zero time generate the result...
Subject to non quantum systems lag:)
Which brings up an interesting phenonomom...
You could in theory place the photon detector inside the object, and still recive the same result as you could detect the diffrence between the result of what the system would have generated had the photon tunneled through the object to the point of the detector and then triggered the detector, and the result had the photon tunneled entirly through the object.
Which leads me to believe that the whole system could be simplified by haveing 2 layers of photon detectors and 2 quantum calculations then compareing the probailistic results matrix between them via a 3rd quantum calculation. Reciveing the vector of the photons enableing a true holographic simulation to be put into place around the vehicle.
Thus entirly negateing the photon detector lag, as you would only need the detectors to be able to detect the image with whatever infinitly small probalitity, NOT to actually detect anything. your new system would only be susceptiable to holographic generator lag.
Which leads me to wonder why they don't use quantum detectors in this manner to detect for the existence of superrare or superneutral particles in high energy particle physics.
All that would be nessicary is for the system to be ABLE to detect such a particle, not to actually detect it. And for such a particle to EXIST. If it could not exist(I.E. a make believe particle), and your detector was actually capable of detecting it, then you would be able to tell. If it did exist and your detector was able to detect it then it would by definition detect it due to the laws of quantum dynamics...
Could entirly take the whole high energy generator expensivness of the current experimentation out of it...
Essentially the question is "Is a solidstate quantum detector in a nearly closed system capable of detecting?" Thats not technically correct, but yes, a quantum computer would fix the delay problem.
Quantum computers can in this case calculate the probability of photon intensity, giving the probable image the minute it is detected. The only delay in the system would be how fast the sensors can detect photons and how fast the holographic emiters can generate them.
Dam was hopeing nobody would catch that I just pulled that out of thin air:)
Am a geneticist, not a quantum physicist!
If you actually understand this stuff, I have some more questions for you. Essentially as I (Actually not made up) understand it such a system would calculate the photon's probale location at area X if it has come in through photon detector Y because it could have passed through the object with whatever irrelivantly small probability.
Which is to say that by observeing the diffrence in the result matrix of what is actually and what could have been had the photon from detector Y passed through the entire object it can in zero time generate the result...
Subject to non quantum systems lag:)
Which brings up an interesting phenonomom...
You could in theory place the photon detector inside the object, and still recive the same result as you could detect the diffrence between the result of what the system would have generated had the photon tunneled through the object to the point of the detector and then triggered the detector, and the result had the photon tunneled entirly through the object.
Which leads me to believe that the whole system could be simplified by haveing 2 layers of photon detectors and 2 quantum calculations then compareing the probailistic results matrix between them via a 3rd quantum calculation. Reciveing the vector of the photons enableing a true holographic simulation to be put into place around the vehicle.
Thus entirly negateing the photon detector lag, as you would only need the detectors to be able to detect the image with whatever infinitly small probalitity, NOT to actually detect anything. your new system would only be susceptiable to holographic generator lag.
Which leads me to wonder why they don't use quantum detectors in this manner to detect for the existence of superrare or superneutral particles in high energy particle physics.
All that would be nessicary is for the system to be ABLE to detect such a particle, not to actually detect it. And for such a particle to EXIST. If it could not exist(I.E. a make believe particle), and your detector was actually capable of detecting it, then you would be able to tell. If it did exist and your detector was able to detect it then it would by definition detect it due to the laws of quantum dynamics...
Could entirly take the whole high energy generator expensivness of the current experimentation out of it...
Last edited: