Ratio of Potential: Calculating ##\phi_0/\phi_1##

In summary: No, I don't think you understood my post.Consider a cube A of side L, and a corner of it, P. Somewhere inside the cube is a small cubic element C of side dx << L. C is distance r from P. The element generates a potential at P. Now, replace cube A by cube B of side 2L. The corner P of cube A is now distance 2r from the element C. How has that affected the potential at corner P?The potential at corner P would be reduced by a factor of 4, since the distance is now twice as much and the potential is inversely proportional to the distance squared. So, the ratio of potential at the
  • #1
Buffu
849
146

Homework Statement


Consider a charge distribution which has the constant density ##\rho## everywhere inside a cube of edge ##b## and is zero everywhere outside. Let ##\phi## zero at infinity, ##\phi_0## at the centre of cube and ##\phi_1## at one corner of the sphere. Determine the ratio ##\phi_0/\phi_1##. Hint : Think about the potential at the center of the cube with same charge density and with twice the edge length.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand the hint. I guess the potetial at centre would remain if the edge is doubled.

I guess I now have to use superpositon principle but I am not sure how. Please help me understand the hint. :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Buffu said:

Homework Statement


Consider a charge distribution which has the constant density ##\rho## everywhere inside a cube of edge ##b## and is zero everywhere outside. Let ##\phi## zero at infinity, ##\phi_0## at the centre of cube and ##\phi_1## at one corner of the sphere cube. Determine the ratio ##\phi_0/\phi_1##. Hint : Think about the potential at the center of the cube with same charge density and with twice the edge length.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand the hint. I guess the potetial at centre would remain if the edge is doubled.

I guess I now have to use superpositon principle but I am not sure how. Please help me understand the hint. :).
From 8 cubes, you can make a cube with twice the edge length. At the center of the big cube, you have eight corners of the small cubes. The potentials add up.
 
  • #3
Buffu said:
sphere.
Oh I am an idiot.

ehild said:
From 8 cubes, you can make a cube with twice the edge length. At the center of the big cube, you have eight corners of the small cubes. The potentials add up.
Ok, so if I take some "small cube" of which, when taken 8, makes the given cube. The the 8 corners of the "small cubes" will make the given cube.

So, if potential at corner of each small cube is ##\phi## then ##\phi_0 = 8\phi## and ##\phi_0/\phi_1 = 8## ? is this correct ?
 
  • #4
Buffu said:
if potential at corner of each small cube is ϕ then ##\phi_0 = 8\phi##
If the potential at one corner of a small cube, in isolation, is φ then ##\phi_0 = 8\phi##, but how does that φ compare with φ1 ?
 
  • #5
Buffu said:
So, if potential at corner of each small cube is ##\phi## then ##\phi_0 = 8\phi## and ##\phi_0/\phi_1 = 8## ? is this correct ?

No, Φ0 and Φ1 refer of the big cube. Φ0=8φ1, where φ1 is the potential at the corner of the small cube. How does the potential at the corners depend on the size of the cube?
How would you calculate the potential at a corner of a cube?
 
  • #6
ehild said:
No, Φ0 and Φ1 refer of the big cube. Φ0=8φ1, where φ1 is the potential at the corner of the small cube. How does the potential at the corners depend on the size of the cube?
How would you calculate the potential at a corner of a cube?
haruspex said:
If the potential at one corner of a small cube, in isolation, is φ then ##\phi_0 = 8\phi##, but how does that φ compare with φ1 ?

Any corner of big cube is made up of one corner of small cube, so ##\phi_1 = \varphi## where ##\varphi## is potential of a corner of small cube and ##\phi_1## is potential of corner of large cube. No ?
 
  • #7
Buffu said:
Any corner of big cube is made up of one corner of small cube, so ##\phi_1 = \varphi## where ##\varphi## is potential of a corner of small cube and ##\phi_1## is potential of corner of large cube. No ?
No. A cube eight times the volume but the same charge density will have eight times the charge. As against that, the corner will be further from the individual charges on average. Can you figure out how doubling the side of the cube affects the potential at each corner?
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
No. A cube eight times the volume but the same charge density will have eight times the charge. As against that, the corner will be further from the individual charges on average. Can you figure out how doubling the side of the cube affects the potential at each corner?

Do I need to do a tedious integration ? I don't think there is any way of figuring that out.
 
  • #9
Buffu said:
Do I need to do a tedious integration ? I don't think there is any way of figuring that out.
No need for integration as such.
Consider a tiny cubic element of side dx at distance r from a corner of the whole cube. This generates some potential at the corner. Now double the linear dimensions, so the tiny cube is side 2dx but 2r from the corner, same charge density. What does that do to the potential it generates at the corner?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
No need for integration as such.
Consider a tiny cubic element of side dx at distance r from a corner of the whole cube. This generates some potential at the corner. Now double the linear dimensions, so the tiny cube is side 2dx but 2r from the corner, same charge density. What does that do to the potential it generates at the corner?

Ok. Let's say it generates ##\phi## at the corner. Now we double the side to 2 dx which means we are adding 8 other cubes of side dx all of which contributes ##\phi## to the corner, so the total would be ##8\phi## ?
 
  • #11
Buffu said:
Ok. Let's say it generates ##\phi## at the corner. Now we double the side to 2 dx which means we are adding 8 other cubes of side dx all of which contributes ##\phi## to the corner, so the total would be ##8\phi## ?
No, I don't think you understood my post.
Consider a cube A of side L, and a corner of it, P. Somewhere inside the cube is a small cubic element C of side dx << L. C is distance r from P. The element C has charge ρ dx3. What potential does it raise at P?
Now map this to cube A' of side 2L, corner P', and a small cubic element C', just by doubling all the distances and keeping ρ the same. What is the ratio between the charge on C over that on C'? What is the ratio of the distance from C to P over that from C' to P'? So what is the ratio between the potential C creates at P over that created by C' at P'?
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Consider a cube A of side L, and a corner of it, P. Somewhere inside the cube is a small cubic element C of side dx << L. C is distance r from P. The element C has charge ρ dx3. What potential does it raise at P?

##\dfrac{\rho dx^3} {r}## maybe ??

haruspex said:
No, I don't think you understood my post.
Now map this to cube A' of side 2L, corner P', and a small cubic element C', just by doubling all the distances and keeping ρ the same. What is the ratio between the charge on C over that on C'? What is the ratio of the distance from C to P over that from C' to P'? So what is the ratio between the potential C creates at P over that created by C' at P'?

Ratio of charge ##\displaystyle {\rho dx^3 \over \rho 8dx^3} = {1\over 8}##

Ratio of distance is ##r/2r## = ##1/2##

Ratio of potetial is ##\dfrac{\rho dx^3}{r} \over \dfrac{\rho 8dx^3}{ 2r}## = ##2\over 8## = ##1\over 4##.

Sorry for troubling you.
 
  • #13
Buffu said:
##\dfrac{\rho dx^3} {r}## maybe ??
Ratio of charge ##\displaystyle {\rho dx^3 \over \rho 8dx^3} = {1\over 8}##

Ratio of distance is ##r/2r## = ##1/2##

Ratio of potetial is ##\dfrac{\rho dx^3}{r} \over \dfrac{\rho 8dx^3}{ 2r}## = ##2\over 8## = ##1\over 4##.

Sorry for troubling you.
Right. So what does that give you as the answer to the question?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Right. So what does that give you as the answer to the question?
Potential at centre is ##\phi_0 = 8\varphi## where ##\varphi## is potential at the corner of small cube.

Also ##\displaystyle {\varphi \over\phi_1} = 1/4##, where ##\phi_1## is for corner of large cube.

So ##\varphi = \phi/4## or ##\phi_0 = 8 * \phi_1/4 = 2\phi_1## which is ##\phi_0/\phi_1 = 2## Hope this is correct.
 
  • #15
Buffu said:
Potential at centre is ##\phi_0 = 8\varphi## where ##\varphi## is potential at the corner of small cube.

Also ##\displaystyle {\varphi \over\phi_1} = 1/4##, where ##\phi_1## is for corner of large cube.

So ##\varphi = \phi/4## or ##\phi_0 = 8 * \phi_1/4 = 2\phi_1## which is ##\phi_0/\phi_1 = 2## Hope this is correct.
2 is the answer I got.
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
2 is the answer I got.

Done Thanks !
 

What is the ratio of potential?

The ratio of potential refers to the comparison between two different potentials. In this case, the ratio is between the potential ##\phi_0## and ##\phi_1##. It is often used in scientific calculations and experiments to understand the relationship between different potentials.

How do you calculate the ratio of potential?

To calculate the ratio of potential, you need to divide the value of ##\phi_0## by ##\phi_1##. The resulting number will be the ratio of potential. This calculation can be done using a calculator or manually by dividing the two values.

What is the significance of calculating the ratio of potential?

Calculating the ratio of potential helps scientists to better understand the relationship between two different potentials. It can also provide important insights into the physical or chemical properties of a substance or system. It is a crucial step in many scientific experiments and calculations.

Can the ratio of potential be negative?

Yes, the ratio of potential can be negative. This indicates that the two potentials have an inverse relationship, meaning that as one increases, the other decreases. Negative ratios of potential are common in physics, chemistry, and other scientific fields.

What units are used to express the ratio of potential?

The ratio of potential is a dimensionless quantity, meaning that it has no physical units. It is simply a numeric value that represents the relationship between two potentials. However, the individual potentials may have units, such as volts (V) for electrical potential or joules (J) for gravitational potential.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
676
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
864
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top