Real America: Sarah Palin's Vision of Pro-American Areas

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
In summary: First you will have to inform me as to which States are pro-American, and which States are anti-American. I asked what she meant. And yes, I do have my suspicions.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,757
We believe that the best of America is not all in Washington, D.C. We believe" -- here the audience interrupted Palin with applause and cheers -- "We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation. This is where we find the kindness and the goodness and the courage of everyday Americans. Those who are running our factories and teaching our kids and growing our food and are fighting our wars for us. Those who are protecting us in uniform. Those who are protecting the virtues of freedom."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/17/palin_clarifies_her_pro-americ.html

It seems that Palin only wishes to represent some Americans. I wonder which cities and States she considers anti-American. Could it be that by pro-American, she means white?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ivan Seeking said:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/17/palin_clarifies_her_pro-americ.html

It seems that Palin only wishes to represent some Americans. I wonder which cities and States she considers anti-American.
Gee, you're trying really hard to stir up trouble, aren't ye? :rolleyes:

Could it be that by pro-American, she means white?
Please provide links supporting your allegation. If you cannot, then you really ought to withdraw the comment.
 
  • #3
Hurkyl said:
Gee, you're trying really hard to stir up trouble, aren't ye? :rolleyes:

Then tell me, what did she mean? Are small town folk better Americans than city folk?

Please provide links supporting your allegation. If you cannot, then you really ought to withdraw the comment.

First you will have to inform me as to which States are pro-American, and which States are anti-American. I asked what she meant. And yes, I do have my suspicions.

A question is an allegation?
 
  • #4
Could it be that by pro-American, she means white?

I think it she means people who like her cling to guns and religion. :smile:
 
  • #5
She's an idiot: it's hardly worth trying to guess what she means because she probably doesn't even know herself.
 
  • #6
Cristo, although I agree in principle, I think we have a right a clear answer as to what she means. Keep in mind that almost half of this country is ready to cast a vote that would put her one heartbeat from the Presidency. Now is our only chance to learn more about this mystery woman before, potentially, she is given the nuclear launch codes.

So far we know that her husband was a seven-year member of a group whose founder stated that he hates America - a group that wants to secede from the Union. Note that we fought a civil war over secession. She has expressed the clear intent to expand the powers of the Vice President with complete disregard for the Constitution. She even referred to the Palin-McCain ticket in one rally! She apparently sees nothing wrong with Cheney and his abuse of power. She claims experience that she clearly doesn't have. She attends extremist end-time churches where people speak in tongues.. Frankly, I think we have good reason to be very concerned about this woman and her "first dude".
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Ivan Seeking said:
Now is our only chance to learn more about this mystery woman before, potentially, she is given the nuclear launch codes.
Fearmongering now? :rolleyes:
 
  • #8
Palin must have all options available to deal with Eyeran's nukular weapons that can wipe Israel off the map any moment now.
 
  • #9
Palin had a rally in Bangor, ME yesterday and drew about 6000 people. She has a solution for Maine's high rate of taxation - "The solution is to stop spending so doggone much money." What an economic powerhouse she is. We are a very rural state with lots of infrastructure to maintain, and with jobs flying out the window, tax revenues are falling. At the same time, the costs of asphalt, diesel, etc are soaring and we have had to defer badly-needed highway maintenance because we simply don't have the money.

It's appalling that she could come to the state and beg for votes with NO briefing on some of the specific challenges that we face, including paper mill closings, sawmill closings, and a practical collapse of the lobster industry, with high fuel costs, decreasing demand for lobsters, etc conspiring to drive lots of previously successful fishermen out of business. Taxes too high? Don't spend so much doggoned money! Why didn't we think of that?
 
  • #10
Ivan Seeking said:
Then tell me, what did she mean? Are small town folk better Americans than city folk?

That's not as far-fetched as it might sound. Wal-Mart wouldn't have gotten its start in small-town Arkansas if it weren't for the people there who hated the big store chains from New York, etc. The people who think it makes sense to call a 200,000 square-foot Wal-Mart a "neighbourhood market" are probably the sort of people Palin wants to represent.
 
  • #11
I kind of hope McCain and Palin win just so I can have another four years of funny news broadcasts...then I remember I want there to still be an America in four years.

Wal-Mart wouldn't have gotten its start in small-town Arkansas if it weren't for the people there who hated the big store chains from New York, etc.
How does this make them better? Makes them sound incapable of making a decision based on objective values.
 
  • #12
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4944922.ece"


Others considered Mr Obama to be a subversive, terrorist- sympathising, America-hating radical and covert Muslim. They cited his links to the former Weathermen militant Bill Ayers, and to Jeremiah Wright, his fiery former minister. Some claimed that he supported sharia in Kenya and consorted with Hugo Chávez of Venezuela.

“What turned me off was the way he wouldn't put his hand over his heart for the Pledge of Allegiance or wear a flag pin. I don't know how you can call yourself an American if you don't do that,” Heather Zimerman, 39, a substitute teacher, said.

“He's smart, articulate and beguiling but his supporters — his inner circle— are radicals who want revolution,” Billy Benton, 55, an estate agent, said. “I don't know what he was doing in Indonesia all those years — hanging around with Muslim terrorists?” Madeleine Willis, 60, a retired factory worker, asked.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
While I have heard her praise the flag many times, not once have I heard her defend or praise the Constitution.
 
  • #14
turbo-1 said:
Palin had a rally in Bangor, ME yesterday and drew about 6000 people. She has a solution for Maine's high rate of taxation - "The solution is to stop spending so doggone much money." What an economic powerhouse she is. We are a very rural state with lots of infrastructure to maintain, and with jobs flying out the window, tax revenues are falling. At the same time, the costs of asphalt, diesel, etc are soaring and we have had to defer badly-needed highway maintenance because we simply don't have the money.

It's appalling that she could come to the state and beg for votes with NO briefing on some of the specific challenges that we face, including paper mill closings, sawmill closings, and a practical collapse of the lobster industry, with high fuel costs, decreasing demand for lobsters, etc conspiring to drive lots of previously successful fishermen out of business. Taxes too high? Don't spend so much doggoned money! Why didn't we think of that?

The funny thing is the day before the Palin rally, RNC decided to pull out from Maine. It appears that for some reason Palin didn't get the memo from her own party, which is rapidly collapsing like a dysfunctional family.

So, above all else, this election proofs that community organizer is indeed an important asset.
 
  • #15
phoenixy said:
The funny thing is the day before the Palin rally, RNC decided to pull out from Maine. It appears that for some reason Palin didn't get the memo from her own party, which is rapidly collapsing like a dysfunctional family.

So, above all else, this election proofs that community organizer is indeed an important asset.
You know, if Obama showed up here for a rally, he would have drawn tens of thousands AND he would have have made specific knowledgeable comments about not only the challenges facing our state, but he also would have been able to make comparisons to current conditions in other states. The GOP is asking us to trust an old man with no dignity or integrity remaining, and an air-head evangelical whose grasp of policy, economics, etc, might charitably be said to be on a par with that of a middle-school student. (Not a smart, informed middle-school student, mind you.)
 
  • #16
I grew up in Nashville Tennessee in the 1940's and 50's. I went to segregated schools, and segregated churches and movies, and rode on segregated buses. I have met a lot of bigots in my time, and struggled hard not to be one.

I think I know what kind of America Sarah Palin represents: can you spell "intolerant"?Todays paper carried a story of the head of the Chaffee Community Republican Women's group, in San Bernardino, CA, who distributed a newsletter with a picture of Barack Obama on an $10 bill adorned with fried chicken, ribs and watermelon.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/10/obama-bucks-and.html

Diane Fedele, president of the organization said she had no racist intent. I guess she is pleading extreme imbecility.

Is this an example of the small town USA that was meant?
 
Last edited:
  • #17
I think the matter is whether we want to live in a country where knowledge and ideas are important or whether we think all that book learning is, by golly, just a bunch of elitist hogwash. In that vein, we have to ask whether we really, really value science or should we just go ahead and agree there must have been dinosaurs on Noah's ark.

It is telling that such dyed-in-the-wool conservatives as David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, Christopher Buckley, and even (in a small way) George Will have backed away from the anti-intellectualism of the Palin-McCain campaign.

How many of us knew right away what kind of "overhead projector" McCain so soundly derided? For goodness sakes, it was a star projection system (as soon as we heard $3 million, we knew) for the Adler Planetarium (long a hot-bed of cosmological radicals!).
 
  • #18
SticksandStones said:
How does this make them better? Makes them sound incapable of making a decision based on objective values.

I don't think it makes any sense either. Wal-Mart was small once but it too has become what the small-town Arkansans (?) hated when it got started.
 
  • #19
Any sort of "no true Scotsman" speech is quite disturbing. We are all Americans*, no matter what size city we live in.

* Meant to apply to US citizens, of course.
 
  • #20
  • #22
mathwonk said:
I grew up in Nashville Tennessee in the 1940's and 50's. I went to segregated schools, and segregated churches and movies, and rode on segregated buses. I have met a lot of bigots in my time, and struggled hard not to be one.

I think I know what kind of America Sarah Palin represents: can you spell "intolerant"?


Todays paper carried a story of the head of the Chaffee Community Republican Women's group, in San Bernardino, CA, who distributed a newsletter with a picture of Barack Obama on an $10 bill adorned with fried chicken, ribs and watermelon.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/10/obama-bucks-and.html

Diane Fedele, president of the organization said she had no racist intent. I guess she is pleading extreme imbecility.

Is this an example of the small town USA that was meant?
How, in the name of all that is holy, can someone do that without intending to be racist? There is NO way someone could just happen to pick up several racist stereotypes, throw them together, and have no knowledge of the racist implications of it.
 
  • #23
SticksandStones said:
How, in the name of all that is holy, can someone do that without intending to be racist? There is NO way someone could just happen to pick up several racist stereotypes, throw them together, and have no knowledge of the racist implications of it.

I saw the interviews with this woman's family - her husband and her daughter - on MSNBC or CNN can't remember which and their response was what's stereotypical about fried chicken and watermelon on food stamps? The daughter said she ate fried chicken, so ...? The husband threw in the ridiculous observation of asking if spaghetti and meatballs was stereotypical.

Palin's America is apparently dumb as dirt.
 
  • #24
...Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill had harsh words for Palin when she introduced Obama on Saturday. Referring to comments Palin made earlier this week in North Carolina about “pro-America” states, McCaskill said “We have reached a new low in America politics when a candidate dares to say that one part of America is pro-America and another part is anti-America.” [continued]
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/10/18/obama-rally-draws-100000-in-missouri/
 
  • #25
LowlyPion said:
I saw the interviews with this woman's family - her husband and her daughter - on MSNBC or CNN can't remember which and their response was what's stereotypical about fried chicken and watermelon on food stamps? The daughter said she ate fried chicken, so ...? The husband threw in the ridiculous observation of asking if spaghetti and meatballs was stereotypical.

Palin's America is apparently dumb as dirt.
They're liers. No one could pick those foods and nothing else unintentionally. The only thing they left out was to dress him like Aunt Jemima.

People that say race isn't going to be a factor against Obama in this race are only fooling themselves.

There was another racist on the news that put up a big sign that said "No BRObama" and he put barbed wire around it so no one could take it down.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
My mom lost two 'friends' when she challenged them on their comments such as 'Obama is a Muslim'. One of them derided my mom as a 'socialist'.

My mom is a very active member of the Methodist Church and engaged in such horrific acts as volunteering to help provide medical care and support to hurricane victims. My dad has helped counsel hurricane victims as well as provided support as he was able.
 
  • #27
Hurkyl said:
Fearmongering now? :rolleyes:

If you consider it fear mongering to state the fact that as President, Palin would be given the nuclear launch codes, then perhaps we agree about Palin more than I realized.

me said:
So far we know that her husband was a seven-year member of a group whose founder stated that he hates America - a group that wants to secede from the Union. Note that we fought a civil war over secession. She has expressed the clear intent to expand the powers of the Vice President with complete disregard for the Constitution. She even referred to the Palin-McCain ticket in one rally! She apparently sees nothing wrong with Cheney and his abuse of power. She claims experience that she clearly doesn't have. She attends extremist end-time churches where people speak in tongues.. Frankly, I think we have good reason to be very concerned about this woman and her "first dude".

Oh yes, I left out that she has now been convicted of ethics violations and abuse of power, as Governer. Is it any wonder that she couldn't name one objections to Cheney's abuses? When asked, the only thing she could name was his hunting accident, which btw, was not an act as Vice President.
 
  • #28
Astronuc said:
My mom lost two 'friends' when she challenged them on their comments such as 'Obama is a Muslim'. One of them derided my mom as a 'socialist'.

Although I was once a loyal Republican, and while I do believe that there are many good people in the Republican party, and while I am essentially an economic conservative at heart, [social libertarian] the fact is that, racists, religious extremists, war and hate mongers, and anti-environmentalists, have long been essential players in the Republican party. As a Republican, I saw this as more background noise than anything. I agreed with the essential philosophies of the party and saw the rest as just..., well, unfortunate. But now this has changed.

Consider that Democrats lost the South for the last 40 years because they were responsible for the Civil Rights Act. How much more clear can it be? This was all about racism! In this regard, the distinction between the two parties is and has always been clear. But now, because of the catastrophic failures of the Republican's and their policies, and because we have not only the first black Presidential nominee, but also an incredibly talented and "transformational" one, the racists and hate mongers are forced out of the shadows. The Republicans can't hide the party trash in the alley any longer. It is time for this party to concede power, dissociate themselves from the extremists, and regain respectablity as the party of proper Conservatism.

As I have said before: For the Republicans, Sarah Palin is the end of the long road to nowhere. They have hit the end of the line.
 
  • #29
I'm not counting any chickens until they hatch. If there's one group of people that can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it's the Democrats.
 
  • #30
SticksandStones said:
I'm not counting any chickens until they hatch. If there's one group of people that can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it's the Democrats.

Indeed! And we will find out shortly if Bush and Cheney were just an aberration - a form of short-term national insanity - or a foreshadowing of what's to come.
 
Last edited:
  • #32
Math Is Hard said:
This just looks like the Democrat version of the "Lipstick on a pig" response. It's the same game - twist the opponent's words and feign outrage.

The lipstick on a pig comment had been used before by Obama as well as McCain. Palin is suggesting that only some Americans are pro-America. How is that the same? And she did belabor the point that she meant "real Americans", and "the best of America".

This is not the same thing. What happened was that she let her true feelings be known.

Also, now Rush is suggesting that Powell's support of Obama is rooted in race. Suddenly Powell is too liberal for our extremists.

Politico's Jonathan Martin and Mike Allen get an email from Rush Limbaugh about Gen. Colin Powell's endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

"Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race," Limbaugh wrote. "OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. I'll let you know what I come up with. [continued]
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/limbaugh-implie.html
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Ivan Seeking said:
The lipstick on a pig comment had been used before by Obama as well as McCain. Palin is suggesting that only some Americans are pro-America. How is that the same? And she did belabor the point that she meant "real Americans", and "the best of America".

This is not the same thing. What happened was that she let her true feelings be known.

Note the word "very"..

Palin said:
..very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation

If she had said "the only patriotic" and "the only pro-America" areas it would be a different story. If that had been the case, then it would be fair to say that she considers other parts of the nation not to be "pro-American".

All she did was praise a group of people that she sees as exceptionally patriotic. I don't see the reason for any fuss over it.
 
  • #34
Actually, I have to question someone who would use the term "pro-America areas". That means, to me, she thinks some areas aren't.

I believe that she let her feelings slip out. She didn't say "the only" because she believes that there are other areas she considers "pro-America". There are apparently parts of the country that she doesn't. Like San Fransisco, perhaps. :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #35
mathwonk said:
Todays paper carried a story of the head of the Chaffee Community Republican Women's group, in San Bernardino, CA, who distributed a newsletter with a picture of Barack Obama on an $10 bill adorned with fried chicken, ribs and watermelon.

Maybe it's just because I'm Canadian, and haven't been personally exposed to that much racism against blacks, but how exactly do fried chicken, ribs, and watermelon constitute racism?
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
991
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
5K
Back
Top