Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well

In summary, the given equation with the general solution for the wave function in an infinite potential well shows that the values of A1 and A2 do not have to be the same in all three regions. The solutions for each region can be found separately by solving the differential equation and applying the appropriate boundary conditions. The reason why the wave function is equal to zero when the potential is infinite is due to the assumption that a particle with finite energy cannot exist in a region with infinite potential, and the boundary condition that the wave function must be a sensible probability distribution. This is also supported by the concept of bound states and scattering states in quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Bullington
Gold Member
28
1
Given the equation ##\frac{d^2 \psi (x)}{{dt}^2}+\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))=0## the general solution is:
$$\psi (x)=A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}$$
If we have an infinite potential well: ## V(x)=\begin{cases} \infty \quad x\ge b\\ 0 \quad a < x < b \\ \infty \quad x \le a \end{cases}## then would that mean I take the limit of x to a and b and both should equal zero? So:

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left(A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}\right)=0+\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)$$ where ## \lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)## diverges. But how could that be zero? Would this mean that ##A_2## must be Zero?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The solution doesn't have to be the same (that is, the values of ##A_1## and ##A_2## don't have to be the same) in all three regions. Indeed, the potential is different in the different regions so you're looking at different differential equations in the different regions, so you'd expect the solutions to be different. Call the three solutions ##\psi_L(x)## (##x\le{a}##), ##\psi_0(x)## (##a\le{x}\le{b}##) and ##\psi_R(x)## (##x\ge{b}##) and solve for them separately within their own domains. You should be able to convince yourself that ##\psi_L(x)=\psi_R(x)=0## pretty quickly, leaving only ##\psi_0(x)## to work out.

Then apply the boundary condition ##\psi_L(a)=\psi_0(a)## and ##\psi_R(b)=\psi_0(b)##, and you'll be home. You can take ##a=0## without loss of generality and the problem becomes a bit simpler.
 
  • Like
Likes Bullington
  • #3
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
 
  • #4
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
For a particle's wavefunction to have a nonzero value at a region where the potential is infinite would suggest that there is a nonzero probability amplitude associated with finding that particle in the region. How can a particle with finite energy exist in a region of space with infinite potential?
 
  • #5
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
In my intro QM class many years ago, the professor used the method of emphatic assertion to demonstrate the truth of this proposition. :-p

You can get a somewhat more rigorous-looking argument by solving Schrodinger's equation for a finite positive potential, applying the boundary condition that ##\psi(\pm\infty)=0##, and then considering the limit as ##V## approaches infinity. That boundary condition can be justified as requiring that the wave function be a sensible probability distribution, meaning that its squared integral across all space is equal to unity.

However, as a practical matter it is reasonable to look for solutions assuming that an infinite repulsive potential in a region means zero probability of the particle being found in that region, which is equivalent to saying that ##\psi=0## in that region.
 
  • #6
Don't forget that in general there are both bound states, where ##\psi(x) \rightarrow 0## for ##x \rightarrow \pm \infty## and "scattering states", where the wave function becomes sinusoidal for ##x \rightarrow \infty## and/or ##x \rightarrow -\infty##. A very good treatment of the one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation can be found in Messiah's QM textbook (vol. 1, if I remember right).
 

Related to Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well

1. What is Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well?

Schrödinger's Equation is a mathematical equation that describes the behavior and evolution of quantum systems. The Infinite Potential Well is a common model used to explain the behavior of a particle confined to a certain region with infinite potential energy barriers on either side.

2. How does the Infinite Potential Well model work?

The Infinite Potential Well model assumes that a particle is confined to a one-dimensional region with infinite potential energy barriers on either side. This means that the particle cannot escape from the region. The particle's behavior is described by Schrödinger's Equation, which takes into account its position, momentum, and energy.

3. What is the significance of Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well?

This model is important because it helps us understand the behavior of particles in confined spaces, such as in nanotechnology or in quantum computing. It also provides a foundation for understanding more complex quantum systems.

4. How is Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well solved?

The equation is solved by using mathematical techniques, such as separation of variables and boundary conditions. The solutions are known as wavefunctions, which describe the probability of finding the particle in a certain position or energy state.

5. What are some limitations of the Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well model?

One limitation is that it only applies to one-dimensional systems. It also assumes that the potential energy is infinite, which is not always the case in real-world situations. Additionally, it does not take into account relativistic effects or interactions between particles.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
621
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
665
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
867
Replies
24
Views
627
Replies
1
Views
649
Replies
2
Views
604
Back
Top