Schwarzschild spacetime proper time to fall radially inward

In summary, the conversation discusses a method for solving a problem involving proper time and the use of a parameterization. The proposed method involves setting two different values for the parameter and then integrating proper time over those values. However, it is determined that the solution is simpler and only requires plugging in the start and end values of the parameter into a given equation for proper time. The reason for this is that the parameterization already represents a geodesic, and there is no need for integration.
  • #1
binbagsss
1,254
11

Homework Statement



Question attached

illbeyourmassiveparticle.png


My method was going to be:

set ##r=R## and solve for ##n(R)##
set ##r=2GM## and solve for ##n(2GM)##

I was then going to integrate proper time ##s## over these values of ##r##:
##\int\limits^{n=cos^{-1}(\frac{4GM}{R}-1)}_{n=cos^{-1}(1)=0} s(n) dn ###

whereas the solution, all you have to do is plug in these values ##n(r)## and ##n(2GM)## into ##s=s(n)##, equation (2).

Is it wrong to integrate or would I get the same answer?

Is the reason that you can plug in and don't need to integrate due to the fact that the lagrangian, is invariant under reparameterisation, or does it have nothing to do with this??:

i.e:
##s=\sqrt{L}=\sqrt{g_{uv}\frac{dx^u}{dn}\frac{dx^v}{dn}} dn##, ##n## the parameter

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution



see above[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it's simpler than that. You are given a parameterisation for ##s## in terms of ##\eta##. So, if you know the start and end values of ##\eta##, you can plug these in and get the start and end proper times.

If you were given ##ds##, then you would have to integrate that to get ##s(\eta)##, but that has already been done for you.

There's no more to it than that.

Re the metric, the fact that the parameterisation represents a geodesic is all you need to know (although even that doesn't really matter). You might want to check that it's a valid geodesic, but it looks like the question is giving you that as well.
 

1. What is Schwarzschild spacetime proper time to fall radially inward?

Schwarzschild spacetime is a mathematical model used to describe the curvature of space-time around a spherical, non-rotating mass. The proper time to fall radially inward refers to the time experienced by an object falling towards the center of the mass from a large distance away.

2. How is the proper time to fall radially inward affected by the mass of the object?

The proper time to fall radially inward is affected by the mass of the object in the sense that the more massive the object, the more it curves space-time and therefore the longer the proper time to fall will be. This can be thought of as a "slowing down" of time near the massive object.

3. What is the significance of Schwarzschild radius in relation to proper time to fall radially inward?

The Schwarzschild radius is a critical value in Schwarzschild spacetime that marks the boundary at which an object will become a black hole. As an object approaches this radius, the proper time to fall radially inward will also approach infinity, meaning that the object will never actually reach the center of the mass.

4. How does the proper time to fall radially inward differ from the coordinate time?

The proper time to fall radially inward is the time experienced by an object falling towards a massive object, while coordinate time is the time measured by an observer at a fixed distance from the massive object. The two can differ significantly near a massive object due to the effects of gravity on space-time.

5. Can the proper time to fall radially inward be measured or observed?

The proper time to fall radially inward is a theoretical concept and cannot be directly measured or observed. However, it is a fundamental aspect of the theory of general relativity and has been confirmed through various observations and experiments, such as the observation of gravitational time dilation near massive objects.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
889
Replies
13
Views
646
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
913
Back
Top