B Seeing Merging Shadows in the Sunlight

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vibhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sunlight
AI Thread Summary
The observation of merging shadows in sunlight can be explained by the angle of the light source, similar to how a sundial functions, with shadows varying based on the time of day. The phenomenon may also relate to the shadow blister effect, where shadows appear to attract each other at certain distances. The discussion highlights that the merging of shadows can occur even when physical distance exists between the objects casting them. Participants express curiosity about the mechanics behind this visual effect and seek clarification on its definition. Overall, the interaction of light and shadow creates intriguing visual phenomena that warrant further exploration.
Vibhu
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Today when I was standing beside a container in sunlight I observed that the shadow of my hand merged at a certain distance with of the container even though their was enough distance between my hand and container for light to pass is there a reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there's a reason. If you consider a sundial, you'll recognize that the shadow cast by the gnomon depends on the angle of the gnomon relative to the light source, i.e. the sun, which depends on the time of day.

16b1c27e92c406007b2d9ca80b77eb5d.gif


If a small bird were to alight on the III in the illustration, none of its shadow would be merged with that of the gnomon, but if it were to alight on the IX, almost all of its shadow would be merged with that of the gnomon, and the distance from the gnomon of the III and the IX is about the same.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
sysprog said:
Yes, there's a reason. If you consider a sundial, you'll recognize that the shadow cast by the gnomon depends on the angle of the gnomon relative to the light source, i.e. the sun, which depends on the time of day.

View attachment 241378

If a small bird were to alight on the III in the illustration, none of its shadow would be merged with that of the gnomon, but if it were to alight on the IX, almost all of its shadow would be merged with that of the gnomon, and the distance from the gnomon of the III and the IX is about the same.
It looked like the Shadows were attracting each other after a certain distance each time I did it. Thank you for this explanation but I don't think it is correctly defining it.
 
DrClaude said:
Or it may be the shadow blister effect.
Also not this one, I read this one and was very knowledgeable.
 
Vibhu said:
It looked like the Shadows were attracting each other after a certain distance each time I did it. Thank you for this explanation but I don't think it is correctly defining it.
That seems more like the shadow blister effect phenomenon to which @DrClaude alluded, but given that you disclaim that, perhaps you could provide a more detailed description.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top