Separation of variables in spherical coordinates (electrostatics)

In summary, the problem was to find the c_i's for the equation ##V \left(r, \theta \right) = \sum_{\ell = 0}^{\infty} \left( A_\ell r^\ell + \frac{B_\ell}{r^{\ell + 1}}\right) P_\ell \left( \cos \theta\right)##. The person solved it by expanding the righthand side and equating coefficients.
  • #1
milkism
117
15
Homework Statement
Need help with setting up the first part of the problem.
Relevant Equations
See solution.
Problem:
fa5007c579a379e3e58e9fb1f28e4fd4.png


Solution:
When I looked at an example problem, they started writing the potential in terms of the Legendre polynomials.
The example problem:
8d13019377fe67349760b37632205e52.png

This is what I did:
$$V_0 \alpha P_2 (\cos(\theta)) \Rightarrow \frac{\alpha 3 \cos ^2 (\theta)}{2} - \frac{\alpha}{2} \Rightarrow \frac{\alpha 3}{2} - \frac{\alpha}{2}= 1 \Rightarrow \alpha = 1$$
Hence,
$$V(\theta) = V_0 P_2 (\cos(\theta)).$$
Have I done right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
milkism said:
Homework Statement: Need help with setting up the first part of the problem.
Relevant Equations: See solution.

Problem:
View attachment 325294

Solution:
When I looked at an example problem, they started writing the potential in terms of the Legendre polynomials.
The example problem:
View attachment 325295
This is what I did:
$$V_0 \alpha P_2 (\cos(\theta)) \Rightarrow \frac{\alpha 3 \cos ^2 (\theta)}{2} - \frac{\alpha}{2} \Rightarrow \frac{\alpha 3}{2} - \frac{\alpha}{2}= 1 \Rightarrow \alpha = 1$$
Hence,
$$V(\theta) = V_0 P_2 (\cos(\theta)).$$
Have I done right?
Also with radial dependance do they just mean calculate A_l and B_l?
 
  • #3
Yes you are supposed to find ##A_\ell## and ##B_\ell## and plug them into the generic formula

##V \left(r, \theta \right) = \sum_{\ell = 0}^{\infty} \left( A_\ell r^\ell + \frac{B_\ell}{r^{\ell + 1}}\right) P_\ell \left( \cos \theta\right)##

On physical grounds ##A_\ell = 0## outside and ##B_\ell = 0## inside because we cant have the potential blowing up at infinity or at the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
You may want to start with [tex]
\left.\begin{array}{r}
P_2(\cos \theta) = \frac{1}{2}(3 \cos^2 \theta - 1) \\
P_0(\cos \theta) = 1 \end{array}\right\} \quad \Rightarrow\quad
\cos^2 \theta = \frac23P_2(\cos \theta) + \frac13P_0(\cos \theta)[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes milkism, vanhees71 and PhDeezNutz
  • #5
milkism said:
Hence,
$$V(\theta) = V_0 P_2 (\cos(\theta)).$$
Have I done right?
No. Write out the righthand side as a polynomial in ##\cos\theta##, and you'll see it doesn't equal the given ##V(\theta)##.

In the example problem, you have the potential ##V = k \cos 3\theta= k(4\cos \theta^3-3\cos\theta)##, which is a third-order polynomial of ##\cos\theta##. That means it's an element of the vector space consisting of polynomials of degree 3 or fewer.

The first four Legendre polynomials are a basis for this vector space, so any element of the vector space can be expressed as a linear combination of the Legendre polynomials. In other words, you can say
$$4k\cos^3\theta - 3k\cos\theta = c_3 P_3(\cos\theta) + c_2 P_2(\cos\theta) + c_1 P_1(\cos\theta) + c_0 P_0(\cos\theta).$$ The problem is then finding the appropriate values for the ##c_i##'s.

A straightforward way to do that is to simply expand out the righthand side and then equating coefficients from the two sides of the equation. You'll get a system of four linear equations which is simple to solve. Griffiths used a useful shortcut to deduce ##c_0 = c_2 = 0##, so he ended up with a system of two equations and two unknowns.

In your problem, you have ##V=V_0 \cos^2\theta##. It's an element of the vector space consisting of polynomials of degree 2 or fewer, and the first three Legendre polynomials will span that space. So the problem is to find ##c_0##, ##c_1##, and ##c_2## so that
$$V_0 \cos^2\theta = c_2 P_2(\cos\theta) + c_1 P_1(\cos\theta) + c_0 P_0(\cos\theta).$$ Expand the righthand side and then equate coefficients to get the equations you need to solve.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism, PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
  • #6
Thanks you all, first time doing such problem and I completely understand it now!
 
  • #7
Also for finding the electrostatic dipole moment of the system can we just use the surface charge density on the surface to calculate it?
 
  • #8
milkism said:
Also for finding the electrostatic dipole moment of the system can we just use the surface charge density on the surface to calculate it?
I get zero for electrostatic dipole moment of the system, don't know if it's right.
Using this formula:
4c59089647f90ec8a9d86b847cfad38e.png

I get $$\frac{V_0 \epsilon_0}{R} \left( 5\cos ^2 (\theta) - \frac{4}{3} \right)$$.
Then for electrostatic dipole moment in spherical coordinates:
e935e3747ab3f491d60fc6d7b62c88c0.png

Computing the integral I get zero.
 
  • #9
Having solved this very problem myself, for the outside I do not get a 1/r^2 term for the potential. So I’d have to agree with you about your dipole moment.
 
  • #10
PhDeezNutz said:
Having solved this very problem myself, for the outside I do not get a 1/r^2 term for the potential. So I’d have to agree with you about your dipole moment.
Is it even possible for there to not be a dipole moment?
 
  • #11
Absolutely. The next higher up moment is the quadrupole which in the simplest illustration is two back to back opposing dipoles and therefore the dipole moments cancel out.

The Quadrupole is a 2nd rank (symmetric) tensor and is not so easy to visualize. This moment is scarcely dealt with in Griffiths however there is an exercise pertaining to it.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism
  • #12
PhDeezNutz said:
Absolutely. The next higher up moment is the quadrupole which in the simplest illustration is two back to back opposing dipoles and therefore the dipole moments cancel out.

The Quadrupole is a 2nd rank (symmetric) tensor and is not so easy to visualize. This moment is scarcely dealt with in Griffiths however there is an exercise pertaining to it.
My next problem is to calculate the mono-di and quadrapole of 4 charges haha, luckily no octopole problem.
 
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz
  • #13
PhDeezNutz said:
Absolutely. The next higher up moment is the quadrupole which in the simplest illustration is two back to back opposing dipoles and therefore the dipole moments cancel out.

The Quadrupole is a 2nd rank (symmetric) tensor and is not so easy to visualize. This moment is scarcely dealt with in Griffiths however there is an exercise pertaining to it.
I think the dipole moment is zero because the angular dependant potential is symmetric (even), just like how symmetric molecules have no dipole moment 😅😅
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and PhDeezNutz
  • #14
That makes sense to me.

When you calculate the dipole moment of the 4 charges I bet it’s going to be zero.

Edit: your instructor knows how to choose good problems. It’s nice how one leads into the other with emphasis. I’m a fan.
 
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71 and milkism

1. What is the concept of separation of variables in spherical coordinates?

The concept of separation of variables in spherical coordinates is a mathematical technique used to solve partial differential equations in three-dimensional space. It involves separating the variables in the equation into individual functions of each coordinate, which are then solved separately and combined to obtain the final solution.

2. How is separation of variables used in electrostatics?

In electrostatics, separation of variables is used to solve the Laplace's equation, which describes the electric potential in a region with no charge. By separating the variables into radial, azimuthal, and polar components, the equation can be solved to determine the electric potential at any point in space.

3. What are the advantages of using spherical coordinates in electrostatics?

Spherical coordinates are advantageous in electrostatics because they simplify the mathematical equations involved. The Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates is separable and the boundary conditions are easier to apply, making it easier to solve for the electric potential in a given system.

4. Can separation of variables be applied to other coordinate systems?

Yes, separation of variables can be applied to other coordinate systems such as cylindrical coordinates and Cartesian coordinates. However, the choice of coordinate system depends on the symmetry of the problem and the convenience in solving the equations.

5. Are there any limitations to using separation of variables in spherical coordinates?

One limitation of separation of variables in spherical coordinates is that it can only be applied to problems with spherical symmetry. This means that the electric potential must be independent of the azimuthal angle and the polar angle. If the problem does not exhibit spherical symmetry, other techniques must be used to solve the equations.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
447
Replies
6
Views
978
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
703
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
833
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
803
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
794
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
366
Back
Top